I even sent what I had found to a local news station, along with a note stating,
Maybe you can unravel the mystery of how it is possible that Adam Lanza was the Sandy Hook shooter when SSDI records show his death date as December 13, 2012, the day before Sandy Hook occurred.As a mainstream media source, one would think they would be curious about how Adam Lanza could possibly be the shooter when he died the day before Sandy Hook occurred. However, the local news station, a CBS affiliate, wasn't interested. One has to question, as an alleged investigative agency, why they weren't. After all, isn't truth and accuracy in journalism important? Or is the agenda more important?
And one would think, if the date of Adam Lanza's death was in question, someone would have contacted the Social Security Administration (see GenealogyBank disclaimer on both pictures) long before now. And one would think, if the death date was in error, this record would have either been pulled or corrected.
Now, like so many other Americans, I have to wonder - Who was the real shooter or shooters at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Connecticut?
We know, from the SSDI records, that Nancy Lanza died on December 14, 2012.
And, of course, the fact that Adam Lanza died on December 13, not December 14, brings everything we have been told - by the mainstream media, law enforcement, and the medical examiner - regarding the shooting at Sandy Hook and the deaths of Adam and Nancy Lanza, into question.
How did Adam Lanza really die? Was he murdered? If so, by whom?
How did Nancy Lanza really die? Was she murdered? If so, by whom?
First, we were told that the shooter carried out his mission with two pistols; that the Bushmaster .223 was later found in the car supposedly belonging to Nancy Lanza; then the medical examiner claimed all the deaths were caused by the "long rifle", the Bushmaster .223. That was when law enforcement changed their story to the Bushmaster .223 being used in the killings and a shotgun being the gun found in the trunk of the car.
How could have experienced law enforcement personnel possibly mistaken a shotgun for a Bushmaster .223?
How could law enforcement have possibly mistaken a "long rifle" for a pistol?
Who was the man, wearing camouflage, chased in the woods behind the school, arrested, and taken away?
Who did the guns really belong to? Were they stolen from the Lanza house? Were they really registered to Nancy Lanza?
Who did the car, found parked close to the school, really belong to? Was it stolen from the Lanza residence by the individual who killed Nancy Lanza or was the car not even registered to Nancy Lanza but to someone else?
Is there any connection between the deaths of Adam and Nancy Lanza and the deaths at Sandy Hook? Or were these two incidents actually not connected at all?
Who did Principal Dawn Hochsprung really come face to face with at Sandy Hook Elementary? Who really killed her, five other adults, and 20 children at Sandy Hook Elementary on December 14, 2012? How many shooters were actually involved? How many guns were really used? Remember that the children described the shooter as dressed completely in black including a black head covering. Would children, given the panic going on, be able to identify more than one shooter if they did not see them together and all shooters were dressed the same?
And, of course, looking at this very crucial piece of evidence, concerning when Adam Lanza died, I have to ask, Why are we being lied to?
Looking at all of this, I would even go so far as to entertain the probability that Sandy Hook was a U.S. Government false flag operation. How could I conclude that?
Beginning in late 2011, the scandal concerning Operation Fast and Furious was heating up. Operation Fast and Furious led right into the U.S. Department of Justice and implicated Barack Hussein Obama. Operation Fast and Furious was exposed as a government-led operation walking guns across the border into Mexico. At the same time, Obama and company (including "What difference does it make" Clinton) were alleging those same guns were being supplied, illegally, by Americans. It has been alleged that Obama intended to use Operation Fast and Furious as justification for passing a law banning assault-type weapons. His and Clinton's claims that guns were being supplied, illegally, by Americans certainly makes the case that such was Obama's intent.
Did Sandy Hook happen because Operation Fast and Furious was exposed as a government-led operation, thereby terminating its usefulness to Obama and company in pushing for an assault-type weapons ban?
When Obama made the allegation that the guns ultimately connected to Operation Fast and Furious were being supplied, illegally, by Americans, his allegations did not gain sufficient traction and were being vigorously denied by Second Amendment activists, who, it turned out, were right. Any despot, worth his salt, knows that common sense and fact cannot be overcome unless emotion can be engaged to overcome both.
And, golly, geez whiz, just look at what has occurred in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook incident - mass hysteria has been whipped up, augmented, at every turn, by the mainstream media. Pictures of the Sandy Hook children who died posted everywhere, blow-by-blow coverage of the funerals, impassioned news conferences by Robbie Parker who had to get into the role before beginning to speak, Obama and his fake tears, pictures of Obama and the families of victims, relentless coverage of every little detail all carefully wrapped in sadness and horror with the requisite outrage aimed at guns. It has been a three-ring circus intended, specifically to appeal to people's emotions, right down to the children surrounding Obama as he signed his presidential actions in response to Sandy Hook, and Vice President Biden's dog and pony show on guns. It was not three hours after the blow-by-blow news coverage of the Sandy Hook incident commenced that Bob Schieffer of CBS news was calling for gun control. Coincidence, or is it closer to the truth that Bob Schieffer was just playing his role? That Bob Schieffer has since been inducted into the TV Hall of Fame certainly should leave people wondering - after all, doesn't one good turn deserve another?
And in the six weeks since Sandy Hook, there have been innumerable instances in which law-abiding citizens have successfully defended themselves, their wives, their children, their homes - with legally-owned guns - against the illegal acts of criminals. We have heard nothing of these incidents in the national media, only hearing about them from people who ferreted them out on the internet or heard of them locally and broadcast the news via e-mail or the internet.
At the same time, every incident in which guns have been used illegally to kill multiple people has made the news nation-wide right down to the local affiliates. This is what the mainstream media calls unbiased or balanced reporting.
On January 24, 2013, Dianne Feinstein, the Democrat (and Marxist to the core) Senator from California, introduced her bill, Assault Weapons Ban of 2013. As of this writing, the bill has been given a number - S.150 - but has not yet been entered at the Government Printing Office (GPO); at this time, the only copy of it exists on the website.
In her press release, regarding the same, Feinstein stated:
"The bill introduced today is the product of more than a year of work, with input from across the country," Feinstein said. "Getting this bill signed into law will be an uphill battle, and I recognize that - but it's a battle worth waging. We must balance the desire of a few to own military-style assaults weapons with the growing threat to lives across America. If 20 dead children in Newtown wasn't a wakeup call that these weapons of war don't belong on our streets, I don't know what is." (Underlining added for emphasis)You did catch that, didn't you - "The bill introduced today is the product of more than a year of work, with input from across the country ... If 20 dead children in Newtown wasn't a wakeup call that these weapons of war don't belong on our streets, I don't know what is."
What an interesting coincidence that this bill has been a whole year in the works, and Sandy Hook just happened to occur eleven days before Christmas; and one month after Christmas, Feinstein drops her bill. The old adage that nothing in politics is a coincidence definitely comes into play, supported by the fact that Adam Lanza died one day before Sandy Hook occurred.
And in light of all this, one has to ask - Why the Biden dog and pony show, being as how Feinstein had already spent a year working on S.150, a fact that Democrat colleague Biden undoubtedly knew? By all appearances, that dog and pony show was not for the purpose stated.
In her press release, Feinstein went on to say,
The legislation also protects the rights of law-abiding citizens who use guns for hunting, household defense or legitimate recreational purposes.There is only one problem; and it's a very big problem - The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, contained in the Bill of Rights, is not limited to hunting, household defense or recreation; the Second Amendment states:
"Right to keep and bear arms. A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." (Underlining added for emphasis)In even proposing this legislation, Senator Dianne Feinstein has violated her oath of office to protect and defend the United States Constitution, as has every Senator who has signed on as a co-sponsor.
War has been declared on the law-abiding citizens of the United States of America. That war has been declared by the Marxist occupying the White House, socialist/communist Senators and Representatives in the House and Senate, and the mainstream media who is pushing the cause of these anti-American, anti-freedom loving traitors to the max, all the while ignoring two indisputable facts:
1) laws are for the law-abiding; criminals aren't law-abiding;These two facts alone make the agenda of these gun-grabbing traitors apparent.
2) this law, if passed, will not stop one criminal from obtaining a gun and killing people; this law will have no effect beyond curbing the rights of the law-abiding.
What can you do?
On January 25, 2013, I wrote and sent a letter to Senator Dianne Feinstein, at her Washington, DC office. In that letter I outlined her violation of her oath of office and demanded her immediate resignation. A copy of that letter was sent to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, my State Senators (Murray and Cantwell), my State Representative (Cathy McMorris Rodgers) and Speaker of the House John Boehner, accompanied by a letter requesting Feinstein's benefits and privileges as a Senator be terminated. These two letters can be viewed here and here.
I would encourage every American, concerned about this war that has been declared on their Second Amendment rights, do the same. Additionally, if your Senator is a co-sponsor of S.150, demand their immediate resignation and termination of their rights and privileges as a Senator, as well.
If you believe, as some law-abiding gun owners do, that the Assault Weapons Ban of 2013 is not about your ability to protect and defend your freedom, you need to go watch this film: Obama to Top Brass: Will you fire on American Citizens?
The House and Senate have refused to deal with the fact that Barack Hussein Obama is not a natural born citizen; that he is not eligible, under Article I, Section II, Clause 5, United States Constitution, to the office he holds; that the United States of America has not had a lawful president or commander-in-chief for the past four years, and will not have a lawful president or commander-in-chief for at least another four years unless Congress acts, which does not seem likely. Our rights have been violated and denied.
The House and Senate have refused to deal with the fact that HB 3590, P.L 111-148, otherwise known as Obamacare, is unconstitutional and was signed into law by an individual not lawfully holding the office of president. Our rights have been violated and denied.
The House and Senate have refused to deal with the corruption emanating from the Oval Office as occupied by Obama, including the walking of guns across the border into Mexico under Operation Fast and Furious. Our rights have been violated and denied.
All of this happened while our duly elected, who took an oath to protect and defend the United States Constitution, have stood by and done nothing to stop it. The stench of the corruption emanating from Washington DC is worse than that of a pig sty on a hot day!
The one right that protects all others is the Second Amendment. We should not be surprised that it is now under attack. If we stand back and do nothing to stop the agenda of these gun-grabbing traitors, tyranny will soon follow.