Why isn't our government investigating the connection between mind-altering drugs and violent shootings?
Recently, famed constitutional attorney Jonathan Emord
called on the Trump administration to investigate the possible links between psychiatric drugs and violent gun attacks in the United States.
The FDA is aware that these drugs can cause violent behavior, yet continues to allow powerful, mind-altering drugs to be given to millions of Americans, including children.
We've written previously about
this very topic. We researched dozens of high-profile cases of violent crime over the last few decades, and found that in at least half of the cases, we know that the perpetrator was taking, or had recently stopped taking, some form of antidepressant or antipsychotic medication. It could well be 100% if all the information is made publicly available.
The most recent examples support this thesis. In the Las Vegas shooting, where Stephen Paddock killed 58 people and wounded hundreds of others, the
autopsy showed he was using an anti-anxiety drug. Adam Lanza, the killer involved in the 2013 Sandy Hook school shooting, was suspected to have been on, or recently stopped taking, antipsychotic drugs; but as Emord details, the coroner would not release the deceased Lanza's medical records. The killer in Parkland, Florida, Nikolas Cruz, is also
suspected to have been on some kind of medication for "emotional difficulties," according to a family member, but the specific drug has not yet been specified.
Comment: Russia has shown patience beyond reason with Ukraine's idiot government, out of compassion for its citizens. The blatantly political decision by the Stockholm court is the last straw. Will the EU countries be willing to make up the short-fall from the cancelled Russian deliveries?