Puppet MastersS


Treasure Chest

More blood and conquest: US approves $1.15 billion sale for tanks, heavy gear to Saudi Arabia

US M1 Abrams tank
© AP Photo/ The U.S. Army
The US Department of State has approved a $1.15 billion sale to Saudi Arabia for 153 Abrams main battle tanks and an array of other combat equipment, the Defense Security Cooperation Agency said in a news release on Tuesday.

General Dynamics Land Systems, located in the US state of Michigan, will perform the work, according to the release.

"The State Department has made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for M1A2S Saudi Abrams main battle tanks and M88Al/A2 Heavy Equipment Recovery Combat Utility Lift Evacuation System (HERCULES), Armored Recovery Vehicles (ARV), equipment, training and support," the release stated. "[T]he estimated cost is $1.15 billion."

Bad Guys

Killary's Praetorian Guard: CIA and Pentagon break tradition, publicly endorse their preferred war criminal for president

hillary strangelove
Former director of the Central Intelligence Agency Michael J Morell is the latest in a phalanx of senior US military-intelligence figures who are shedding any pretense of political neutrality and giving their full-throated endorsement to Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

In a New York Times opinion piece, Morell starkly backed Clinton as the most «highly qualified to be commander-in-chief... keeping our nation safe».

The ex-CIA chief's op-ed piece also served as a blunt hatchet job on Republican presidential rival Donald J Trump. Morell said the New York billionaire-turned politician is «not only unqualified for the job, but he may well pose a threat to our national security».

The hoary, old scare-theme of «national security» is being rehabilitated as the criterion for electing Clinton. It also has the disturbing connotation of an increasingly militarized totalitarian regime that the United States is becoming.

Black Magic

White House finally releases "playbook" for killing and (occasionally) capturing terror suspects

drone Obama
© Getty ImagesPredator drones
The Obama administration has released its internal guidelines for how it decides to kill or capture alleged terrorists around the globe, three years after they came into effect. They provide a look at the drone war bureaucracy behind hundreds of strikes in Yemen, Pakistan, Somalia and elsewhere, a system President Obama will hand off to his successor.

The guidelines show the process is concentrated at the White House, specifically in the National Security Council. They also describe the process for approving so-called signature strikes, where the target of the strike is not a known "high value terrorist," but rather some other "terrorist target," which could be a group of people exhibiting suspect behavior, or a vehicle, building or other infrastructure.

Amid all these procedural details, however, the presidential policy guidance, or "playbook," as it has been called, does not provide new insight into when, where, and under what authorities someone can be killed, or what kind of intelligence is necessary to make that decision.

Much of the document, which is dated May 22, 2013, echoes public statements by administration officials over the past several years and previously-released material. The general standards for killing terrorist targets away from active battlefields were made public that May, when the president gave a speech and issued an abbreviated version of the guidance, promising that the United States would only undertake lethal action against a terrorist if they posed a continuing, imminent threat to U.S. persons, and if capture was not feasible.

It took a lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union to get the full 18-page version of the guidance declassified, with some redactions.

Snakes in Suits

State sponsored terrorism: Has CIA's plot to 'covertly' kill Russians in Syria come to pass?

Michael Morell
Former acting director of the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Michael Morell during a televised interview with American talk show host Charlie Rose, openly conspired to commit a raft of war crimes in Syria, suggesting that the US should take measures to "covertly" kill Russians and Iranians through armed proxies on the ground.

He also suggested targeting Syria's senior leadership through a series of terrorist attacks in and around Damascus, according to CBS News.

Info

Crises over? Putin says his talks with Erdogan were constructive and important

Erdogan and Putin
© Alexei Nikolskiy/Russian Presidential press service/TASS
Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Tuesday his talks with his visiting Turkish counterpart, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, were constructive.

He said the meeting was of major significance for further relations between Russia and Turkey. "We had a substantial and, I would like to stress, constructive conversation on the entire spectrum of bilateral ties, and on the international agenda," Putin told a news conference after the talks.

Bad Guys

Think-tanks and bombs: Evil corporations use nonprofits to dodge lobbying rules, receive lucrative favors

jpmorgan
© Eric Thayer / Reuters
It's all supposed to be for the public good, but new reporting based on internal documents and emails reveals deal-making between "think tank" research institutes and giant corporations is driven by more mundane interests.

Think tanks are non-profit policy research establishments with tax-exempt status, as they are assumed to be doing work to advance the public good, not cater to private interests. Traditional lobbying of the federal government is likewise regulated to promote transparency. When the rules become too onerous, or the public image of a corporation is stained by its overt solicitations for policy change, think tanks become a useful corporate device, the New York Times has found, in a Sunday report jointly researched with the New England Center for Investigative Reporting (NECIR).

In one instance, drone manufacturer and military contractor General Atomics sought the services of the think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). With the Afghanistan and Iraq wars in a slump in 2013, fewer drones were being sold to the US military. The California-based maker of Predator drones needed to find customers abroad, but weapons trade restrictions at the time prohibited their export.

Comment: It gets worse than that. The Kagans' Institute for the Study of War directed U.S. military strategy in Afghanistan while their major donors were arms manufacturers. (For details, see our interview with filmmaker Robbie Martin: The Truth Perspective: A Very Heavy Agenda: The rise, fall and resurrection of the neocons.) If there's a rule, you can be sure the war whores will find a way to break it.


Snakes in Suits

Court rules for Chevron against Ecuadorians in $9 billion rainforest damage case

Ecuador rainforest damage
© Julien Gomba / Wikipedia
A New York federal appeals court has ruled that Ecuadorean plaintiffs cannot collect a $9 billion judgment in the US against Chevron for rainforest damage. The case has been labelled the "biggest environmental case in the world."

The decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on Monday upheld a lower court's finding, which found the Ecuadorean court judgment was obtained by corrupt means, according to the Associated Press.

The appeals court said Judge Lewis Kaplan had the authority to rule as he did. It noted, however, that Kaplan's decision after trial doesn't invalidate the Ecuadorian judgment and does not stop the enforcement of the judgment anywhere outside the US.

Comment: Related news on Chevron:


Treasure Chest

World's largest development banks raise $81 billion to tackle climate change impact

World in water graphic
© Pixabay
Six of the world's largest multilateral development banks (MDBs) rounded up $81 billion last year to finance climate change action, their joint report released Tuesday showed.

"In 2015, the MDBs collectively committed more than USD 25 billion in climate finance," the report worked out by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) together with African, European, Inter-American banks and the World Bank Group revealed.

Further $56 billion were contributed to MDBs' projects by other investors, the Manila-based lender said. The banks have cumulatively financed over $131 billion in climate action since 2011.

Comment: Will this drop in the bucket financing even make any difference? Is the science settled on climate change? Not even close!


Map

Tear gas fills Kosovo parliament again as MP protests Montenegro border deal

Kosovo parliment filled with tear gas
© Kallxo.com / YouTube
An opposition lawmaker in Kosovo has used tear gas to disrupt a parliamentary commission on a controversial border agreement with neighboring Montenegro. The MP was reportedly detained by police following the incident.

Driton Caushi, an MP from the opposition Vetevendosje party, set off tear gas during a Tuesday session on a border demarcation agreement that critics say would cause Kosovo to lose over 8,000 hectares (20,000 acres) to Montenegro.

Footage of the incident showed lawmakers coughing and rubbing their eyes as they exited the room where the session was being held.

Question

China's UK ambassador warns relationship at 'crucial historical juncture' over Hinkley nuclear deal

Hinkley Point C nuclear power station site near Bridgwater in Britain
© Darren Staples / ReutersHinkley Point C nuclear power station site near Bridgwater in Britain.
China warns that its relations with the UK have been put at risk by doubts over the future of the controversial Hinkley Point C nuclear power station.

British Prime Minister Theresa May caused shock last month when she ordered a last-minute halt to finalizing the UK's first new nuclear power station in decades, which is being partly funded by China.

Writing in the Financial Times, Liu Xiaoming, China's Ambassador to the UK, says the delay in approving the plant could put the two countries' "mutual trust" at risk.

"If Britain's openness is a condition for bilateral co-operation, then mutual trust is the very foundation on which this is built.

"Right now, the China-UK relationship is at a crucial historical juncture. Mutual trust should be treasured even more.

"I hope the UK will keep its door open to China and that the British government will continue to support Hinkley Point - and come to a decision as soon as possible so that the project can proceed smoothly."