
© politicalinsider.com
The fortuitous discovery of
perhaps thousands of emails exchanged with Hillary Clinton's private email server, recovered from the computer belonging to sexual cluster bomb Anthony Weiner and his estranged missus - Clinton Chief of Staff and vice-chair of her election campaign Huma Abedin - has once again interrupted the manufactured momentum of Clinton inevitability. First and foremost, it reemphasizes the transient nature of Clinton's understanding of 'truth'; she clearly did not turn over to the FBI all emails on the server which were not of a personal nature. Or perhaps it is the concept of 'personal' with which she has an imperfect understanding, so that it includes 'things which might get me in trouble'.
Several sites have attempted to make sense of this election campaign, which is noteworthy as it pits perhaps the two most despised people in America against one another for the increasingly tawdry prize of President of the United States. Let me say that again -
the only thing unusual in these times of negative campaigning and character assassination is that a popular candidate has not emerged - it remains to be determined only who is less hated. Anyway, of those sites, the best I have seen can be found at the Archdruid Report (thanks, Cortes); poignantly entitled,
"The Last Gasp of the American Dream", it is at pains to explain - among other things - that the claim this is the most important election in American history is simply a flailing attempt to lend some dignity and appearance of deliberation to a process that has become nine parts entertainment mixed with one part immature graduation kegger.
There's an old military parable which is a cruder analogy of "You can't put lipstick on a pig", and it's, "You can't buff a turd". It is, frankly, impossible to invest the ongoing election process in America with anything like dignity, and it is instead increasingly apparent to uncomfortable Americans and gobsmacked internationals that it is
a desperate contest by a serial liar to prevent an interloper from outside the insular American political class from occupying the highest office. The Clinton campaign's subtext that repudiating Clinton is spitting in the face of women everywhere is a cheap trick - no further demonstrations are necessary to prove women can do anything men can do which does not require superior upper-body strength, and there are a few women who can do even that. Speaking in the broadest and most general terms, there are some fields in which women are a little better than men, and some in which they generally do not perform as well. But there are virtually none women just can't do, and it should be clear that gender has nothing to do with a natural ability to assume the office of president.
Comment: Wakey Wakey! Deep State USA and the US Presidential Election Farce