
© RTInterview with James Woolsey, Larry Johnson and Annie Machon
Former CIA chief James Woolsey, former CIA analyst Larry Johnson, and former MI5 officer Annie Machon spoke to RT about what the
ODNI report on alleged Russian hacking
reveals about the nature of their claims and the current state of the US intelligence. In live debates hosted by RT on Monday night, Woolsey, Johnson, and Machon took turns providing their expert opinions on the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) reported entitled
Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections, which was released on January 6.
Missing evidence?The unclassified ODNI report was expected to shed light on the scope of Russian involvement in the DNC leaks and provide evidence supporting the claims made by the US intelligence community. Instead, the report has proven to be quite a disappointment, with WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange slamming it as having
"zero evidentiary weight."Former CIA agent Larry Johnson told RT that what had struck him about the report the most is that it contained
"not one shred of evidence" to back up the sprawling accusations against the Russian government.
"At some point in that process,
we should have seen either an electronic or human source that said Vladimir Putin or someone in his government had directed the cyber command in Russia to start a program or a plan... There is
not one source of information in that report," he said, arguing that such negligence
in failing to provide a single source indicates that the so-called "hacks" were instead the result of internal leaks."The fact that WikiLeaks puts out emails, I think there is a
plausible case to be made that they were in fact leaked to WikiLeaks," Johnson pointed out, adding that
"what we found out was not disinformation but actual truthful information."
Comment: For images of the 'evidence' surrounding these allegations: Trump Intelligence Allegations by zerohedge on Scribd
More details: The Russians respond: Trump tweets:
And WikiLeaks:
Russia Insider's Dean Parker blasts the Atlantic for essentially saying that all the networks who knew about the allegations, but who kept them private because they knew they were lies, but who decided to report on the secret allegations as if they were real news, did a very bad thing: The Daily Beast gave the soapbox to the man 4chan claims they trolled, and of course he denied their account: Real stuff? That right there says everything about Wilson you need to know.
Meanwhile ZeroHedge has published the chain of events that allegedly leads from 4chan's message boards all the way to McCain, CNN, and Buzzfeed. One priceless image includes: