Puppet MastersS


Attention

Sixteen countries ban Israelis from entrance: Where is the liberal left outrage?

protesters trump muslim ban immigration
© Aaron P. Bernstein / ReutersActivists gather outside the White House to protest President Donald Trump's executive actions on immigration
Where is the outrage over the fact that Israeli passport holders cannot enter these 16 Muslim nations?

For all the uproar going on in the liberal left camp about Trump's "muslim ban", which has been thoroughly debunked as no ban at all, there is one nation which does have its citizens banned from entering 16 countries.

No protests, no outrage, over the fact that 16 Muslim countries forbid Israeli passport holders from entering their country.

Why are the Soros paid snowflake protestors not "exercising their first amendment rights" in front of the embassies in Washington DC of the countries listed below?

countries banning israelis

Stock Up

Russian officials may not be in a rush to have sanctions lifted

russian ruble
© lexandr Demyanchuk / Reuters
Russian President Vladimir Putin may wait for a while before touching the question of sanctions with US President Donald Trump.

The penalties imposed in 2014 have been pulling Russia's economy back, and have kept the ruble from strengthening. But a weaker ruble makes it easier for the Russian government to balance the budget.

Should the US ease restrictions the value of the ruble may go up by ten percent, according to a majority of experts surveyed by Bloomberg. Forty-one percent of experts expect the Russian currency to gain up to five percent.

Arrow Up

End of tax-free living in Saudi Arabia as oil revenues dry up, the Saudi people get squeezed

A falcon flies from the glove of its Saudi trainer
© Mohamed Alhwaity / ReutersA falcon flies from the glove of its Saudi trainer during a hunting trip in the desert near Tabuk, 1,500 km (932 miles) from Riyadh.
Saudi Arabia has introduced a value-added tax (VAT) with the approval of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), indicating the end of life without VAT across the Gulf.

The decision was taken on Monday and implies a five percent levy on some goods across the six-member Gulf Cooperation Council, which unites Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.

Other Gulf countries are also expected to follow and introduce the VAT system by the beginning of 2018.

The move has IMF backing, which recommended the Gulf States impose revenue raising measures. The countries have already introduced taxes on tobacco and fizzy drinks.

"A Royal Decree has been prepared," the official Saudi Press Agency said.

Comment: The Saudi people get squeezed but the Saudi royals can afford to fly "astonishing pets"!


Magnify

Trump's immigration executive order: Separating fact from the media's fake news fiction

Facts
© Shutterstock
"Any alien coming to this country must or ought to know, that this being an independent nation, it has all the rights concerning the removal of aliens which belong by the law of nations to any other; that while he remains in the country in the character of an alien, he can claim no other privilege than such as an alien is entitled to, and consequently, whatever risque he may incur in that capacity is incurred voluntarily, with the hope that in due time by his unexceptionable conduct, he may become a citizen of the United States." ~Justice James Iredell, 1799
There is a lot of confusion swirling around the events that transpired this weekend as a result of Trump's executive order on immigration. Make no mistake: every word of Trump's executive order is in accordance with statute.

It's important not to conflate political arguments with legal arguments, as many liberals and far too many "conservatives" on social media are doing. While the timing and coordination of implementing this order might have been poorly planned, we shouldn't allow that to undermine the broader need to defend our sovereignty. For courts to violate years' worth of precedent and steal our sovereignty should concern everyone.

Comment: Further reading:


Take 2

Spare us the theatrics! 'Trump's Fortress America' is rooted in Obama years

Obama and Trump
© Reuters/Getty Images
The Trump administration has the media and its political opponents (or do I repeat myself?) in a lather as the White House continues to fire executive orders in quick succession, demolishing the old order and enraging both liberals and their newfound neoconservative allies. Amid all the virtue-signaling hysterics, the most significant aspects of what is occurring are being overlooked - and it's my job to point them out.

While the blue-state crowd is protesting President Trump's order banning travel to the US by citizens of Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Libya, Yemen, and Somalia, what gets lost in all the shouting is that the legal and political basis of his order was laid down by President Barack Obama. These people don't care to recall that, in 2013, Obama banned all refugees from Iraq for six months, and his action was hardly noticed: Trump is only proposing a ninety-day pause. What prompted Obama's action, as ABC News reported at the time, was "the discovery in 2009 of two al Qaeda-Iraq terrorists living as refugees in Bowling Green, Kentucky — who later admitted in court that they'd attacked U.S. soldiers in Iraq."

Two years later, Congress passed a law, the Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act, that restricted travel visas for citizens of "states of concern," i.e. Syria, Sudan, Iraq, Iran and "any other country or area of concern." Obama promptly signed it. In early 2016, the Department of Homeland Security unilaterally extended these restrictions to Yemen, Libya, and Somalia. What this meant was that the visa waiver program did not apply to citizens of these countries: travelers had to apply for a visa at US embassies, a highly problematic matter (Syria, for one, has no such facility) and were very unlikely to be successful in their efforts. I don't recall any protests at the time.

Play

Did the United States Create ISIS?


Did the United States and her allies help create the rise of ISIS? Foreign leaders and U.S Generals believe so.

Comment:


Attention

Acting AG instructs DOJ lawyers not to defend Trump travel ban order (UPDATE)

Sally Yates
© Kevin Lamarque / Reuters U.S. Deputy Attorney General Sally Quillian Yates
Acting Attorney General Sally Yates instructed Justice Department attorneys to not legally defend President Donald Trump's executive order on refugees and immigration.

Yates, an Obama appointee, is expected to be replaced by Trump's pick, Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Alabama), in the near future. Meanwhile, courts in California, Massachusetts, New York, Virginia and Washington state have already been presented with cases challenging the order.

"I am responsible for ensuring that the positions we take in court remain consistent with this institution's solemn obligation to always seek justice and stand for what is right," Yates wrote in a letter, according to the New York Times. "At present, I am not convinced that the defense of the executive order is consistent with these responsibilities nor am I convinced that the executive order is lawful."

Trump responded to Yates' move on Twitter, calling it an example of Democrats' obstruction "for purely political reasons."

Comment: UPDATE:

RT:
Trump fires acting attorney general for refusal to enforce 'extreme vetting' order

President Donald Trump has fired acting Attorney General Sally Yates, making Dana Boente, the US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia the new acting attorney general.

Yates was relieved of her post Monday, just hours after news broke that she was instructing Department of Justice lawyers not to defend the executive order.

Yates "betrayed the Department of Justice by refusing to enforce a legal order designed to protect the citizens of the United States," a press release from the Office of the Press Secretary read.

"I am honored to serve President Trump in this role until Senator Sessions is confirmed. I will defend and enforce the laws of our country to ensure that our people and our nation are protected," Boente said as Acting Attorney General in the press release.



Arrow Down

Paul Craig Roberts - The left is self-destructing

Muslim not Terrorist
© Juan Medina/Reuters
The mindlessness is unbearable. Amnesty International tells us that we must "fight the Muslim ban" because Trump's bigotry is wrecking lives. Anthony Dimaggio at CounterPunch says Trump should be impeached because his Islamophobia is a threat to the Constitution. This is not to single out these two as the mindlessness is everywhere among those whose worldview is defined by Identity Politics.

One might think that Amnesty International should be fighting against the Bush/Cheney/Obama regime wars that have produced the refugees by killing and displacing millions of Muslims. For example, the ongoing war that Obama inflicted on Yemen results in the death of one Yemeni child every 10 minutes, according to UNICEF. Where is Amnesty International?

Clearly America's wars on Muslims wreck far more lives than Trump's ban on immigrants. Why the focus on an immigration ban and not on wars that produce refugees? Is it because Obama is responsible for war and Trump for the ban? Is the liberal/progressive/left projecting Obama's monstrous crimes onto Trump? Is it that we must hate Trump and not Obama?

Immigration is not a right protected by the US Constitution. Where was Dimaggio when in the name of "the war on terror" the Bush/Obama regime destroyed the civil liberties guaranteed by the US Constitution? If Dimaggio is an American citizen, he should try immigrating to the UK, Germany, or France and see how far he gets.

Airplane Paper

Sweden will 'take measures' if port city agrees to Russia's Nord Stream-2 construction

Pipe manufacturing for Nord Stream
© Sergey Guneev/SputnikPipe manufacturing for Nord Stream.
Sweden's defense ministry has refuted reports that it has softened its stance on the use of Karlshamn as the base for the construction of Russia's Nord Stream-2.

Previously, officials claimed that the pipeline - which would transport natural gas into the EU - was "detrimental to Sweden's political and security interests."

"The government's assessment remains unchanged. We will meet representatives of Karlshamn community tonight to receive information from them. If they decide to rent out the port, we will need to take measures," Marinette Nyh Radebo, press secretary of Defense Minister Peter Hultqvist, said ahead of an official decision set to be announced on Tuesday.

Nyh Radebo said that any approval of the project would be accompanied by a strengthening of the coast guard, armed forces, customs, and tighter surveillance over the strategic Baltic port, which is located 50 km away from the key Karlskrona naval base.

The official was responding to a report disseminated by state-owned Swedish Radio, which claimed that the government had its concerns assuaged, noting there is already a significant volume of Russian maritime traffic at the port.

Calendar

Turkish military withdrawing troops in Syrian al-Bab within a month

Turkish Military
© Reuters/Khalil Ashawi
The ongoing Turkish military operation in the vicinity of the Syrian city of al-Bab may be concluded within a month due to a number of factors.

After returning from his African tour last week, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan mentioned that there's no need "to prolong and expand" the ongoing Turkish military operation in al-Bab.

Ismail Hakki Pekin, former chief of the Turkish General Staff Intelligence Department, told Sputnik Turkiye that this decision was made due to a number of factors: namely, the unwillingness of the Turkish military to clash with the Syrian armed forces advancing on al-Bab from the south, the peace talks in Astana, and US President Trump's call to establish safe zones on Syrian territory.

According to Pekin, the liberation of al-Bab and the subsequent withdrawal of the Turkish armed forces from the area may be accomplished within a month. He pointed out however that Turkey will likely maintain a small military presence in al-Bab region to ensure the safety of civilian personnel that Ankara will send there.

"When the al-Bab operation is brought to a close, some Turkish military units will have to remain there because otherwise all gains made during the offensive may be lost. Meanwhile, Syrian army forces are advancing towards al-Bab from the south, and Turkey obviously wants to avoid clashes with Syria. In theory, this situation may prompt Syria and Turkey to engage in direct talks, though a lot depends on whether these two forces will be able to coordinate their actions in al-Bab. At the very least, the Turkish military definitely does not want a direct conflict Syria," Pekin said.