© DOD photo by U.S. Air Force Staff Sgt. Jette CarrPresident Donald J. Trump departs from the Pentagon alongside Secretary of Defense James Mattis
"It's one thing to write a policy," a senior Pentagon civilian privy to the NPR fight told
The American Conservative, "and it's another thing to have it implemented. What the NPR is recommending will break the bank, and a lot of people around here are worried that making nuclear weapons more usable isn't what we should be doing.
The conventional military guys have dug in their heels, they're dead-set against it. This battle isn't over."
In effect, the congressionally mandated review calls for the U.S. to deploy two new types of lower yield nuclear warheads, generally defined as nuclear bombs below a five kiloton range (the one dropped on Hiroshima was 20 kilotons), that could be fitted onto a submarine-launched ballistic missile, and one, yet to be developed, that would be fitted onto a submarine-launched cruise missile.
Additionally, the NPR calls for "recapitalizing" the complex of nuclear laboratories and plants, which, taken together with the proposed modernization program of the U.S. nuclear arsenal (the "triad"),
will almost certainly cost in excess of the estimated price tag of $1.2 trillion over the next 30 years.The drafting of the NPR began in April of 2017, when Defense Secretary James Mattis directed that the work be overseen by the deputy secretary of defense and AF General Paul Selva, the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. But the actual writing of the document was organized by Dr. Robert Soofer, the deputy assistant secretary of defense for nuclear and missile defense policy and a former powerhouse staffer on the Senate Armed Services Committee. Soofer, in turn, depended on a group of nuclear thinkers led by Dr. Keith Payne, the high-profile president of the National Institute for Public Policy (NIPP). Payne was aided by Franklin Miller, an influential defense thinker who, as he confirmed to
The American Conservative by email, provided "advice to DoD" on the project. (Payne did not respond to repeated requests for comment on this article, while Miller emailed that he would not comment until after the NPR was released.)
Comment: Not surprising. Communities need religion (or a cheap substitute) to bind them together. When that group identity is challenged and undermined, it's only natural that people will reassert their group identity by reinvigorating their religion. EU policies directly led to this very scenario. And it's not necessarily a bad thing that it's happening. See Jonathan Haidt's Righteous Mind for the low-down.