© Eibner-Pressefoto / www.globallookpress.comManchester Arena Bombing - Floral Tributes
Hill, the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation, said that the word 'terrorism' should not be attached "to any of the world religions."
His comments mean that Prime Minister Theresa May and Home Secretary Amber Rudd, who have both spoken about the threat posed by "Islamist terrorists," would need to rethink their language. Head of MI5 Andrew Parker has also used the term, previously warning of an "intense UK threat from Islamist extremists."
Labour MP Karen Buck said that Hill's recent report on the operation of terrorism legislation had acknowledged that "Daesh and Daesh-inspired terrorism is the greatest threat," also using the Arabic pejorative term for Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS).
In Parliament's Joint Committee on Human Rights, Buck asked the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation whether, in light of dangers from far-right terrorism, "there is any downside that the current debate does tend to focus largely on Islamic terrorism."
Hill told the MP that the legal definition of terrorism "mentions religion but mentions no particular religion nor sect within a religion."
"You are accurate in using the phrase 'Daesh-inspired terrorism' where many other commentators use the words 'Islamist terrorism',"he said.
"It is fundamentally wrong to attach the word terrorism to any of the world religions. Put that another way round: those who adhere to any of the great religions or none can be terrorists within the definition."
Hill has previously prosecuted in cases involving members of the IRA, Al-Qaeda, IS, and the July 2005 bomb plot.
The recommendation has already attracted criticism online, with Hill being labelled a too politically correct.
Hill's comments will reinforce his reputation for making controversial interventions. Last year, he recommended that jihadists returning from Syria and Iraq should not be prosecuted as they were simply "naïve."
Expression "terror" appears during the French Revolution, not in the emergence of Islam.
Immunity is one thing, allergies are the other thing: an exaggerated, harmful reaction of immunity to the non-toxic substance. People become so sensitive to Islam to become mentally ill. Something like brain inflammation.
What kind of immunity that can not distinguish healthy from sick cells? Therefore, it is necessary to use more precise expressions. Society becomes sick.
If someone criticizes Israel's policy, they call him anti-Semitic and censor him.
But people think that because of a few terrorists they can condemn every Muslim as a terrorist?
Iraq, Syria and Iran are fighting ISIS, does this mean that Syrians and Iranians, the Chechens who help the Syrian government, are not Muslims? So ISIS thinks.