Puppet MastersS


Arrow Up

US outpaces all nations in violating international law

eagle
© David Foldvari
The United States has repeatedly disregarded the UN Charter since its founding, leading to the superpower's increasing isolation in global affairs.

In the Western mainstream North Korea is continually classified as a "rogue nation", a "reclusive state" or, best of all, "the nuclear state". The sense of irony has been lost entirely it seems. Such titles are more applicable to the United States and its right-hand man in the Middle East, Israel. It is conveniently forgotten that the US possesses the largest nuclear weapons arsenal of all.

North Korea is continuing to pose a real dilemma for the US, in what is one of the greatest energy producing regions on earth. Donald Trump's threat to "totally destroy North Korea", in his inaugural UN speech, reportedly drew gasps from the audience. Few pointed out, however, that the US President neglected to put the word "again" at the end of his sentence.

A little over two generations ago, the US completely destroyed North Korea (1950-53) in what was "one of the deadliest wars in modern history". Much of the destruction was inflicted upon the North, and was so severe that it even "shocked and disgusted the American military personnel who witnessed it".

General Douglas MacArthur served as the US Army's Chief of Staff during the 1930s - he was a five-star general and Medal of Honour recipient. Of the Korean War McArthur said,
"I shrink - I shrink with a horror that I cannot express in words at this continuous slaughter of men in Korea. The war in Korea has already almost destroyed that nation of 20 million people. I have never seen such devastation".
MacArthur continues,
"I have seen, I guess, as much blood and disaster as any living man, and it just curdled my stomach the last time I was there [in Korea]. After I looked at the wreckage and those thousands of women and children and everything, I vomited... If you go on indefinitely, you are perpetuating a slaughter such as I have never heard of in the history of mankind".

Comment: Millions have perished. There is no justification, by any nation, worthy of this price.


Rocket

Pentagon: It's a 'matter of a very short time' until N. Korea has capability to send nuke to US

General Dunford
© Andrew Harrer/Global Look PressGeneral Joseph Dunford
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Joseph Dunford told Congress that the US should assume that North Korea already has the capability to attack the US with a nuclear weapon, and plan accordingly. It is the US military's judgement that it is a matter of a "very short time" before North Korea is able to attack the US, Dunford told Senators of the Armed Services Committee on Tuesday.

"We should assume now that they have the capability," although there are still some technical details that the North is working on, he said, adding that Pyongyang has already demonstrated the willingness to use the weapon.

An additional 21 missile interceptors are being deployed to counter the threat from North Korea, as well as "other threats," on top of 44 already in place, Dunford told Congress.

Before carrying out a preemptive attack against North Korea, the general said he would want to have the "full-throated support" of the American people, including Congress.


Comment: Would want to? Meaning he could do it without notification.


The US has also recently increased intelligence collection from North Korea, according to the army chief.

Despite an escalation in rhetoric between the United States and North Korea, Dunford said he has not seen Pyongyang change its military posture. "While the political space is clearly very charged right now, we haven't seen a change in the posture of North Korean forces and we watch that very closely."


Comment: This situation has become a venting war. Russia and China's call for a 'double-freeze' remains the voice of sanity.


Padlock

US sanctions announced for 8 North Korean banks, 26 individuals

NKflagsanctions
© newindianexpress.com
The Trump administration has announced sanctions against eight North Korean banks and 26 individuals, who the US says act as the banks' representatives in various countries, including China, Russia, Libya and the United Arab Emirates.

"As a result of today's action, any property or interests in property of the designated persons in the possession or control of US persons or within the US must be blocked," Treasury Secretary Steven T. Mnuchin said in a statement Tuesday. "This further advances our strategy to fully isolate North Korea in order to achieve our broader objectives of a peaceful and denuclearized Korean peninsula," he added.

19 of the North Korean nationals targeted by the sanctions work in China, while three represent various North Korean banks in Russia, according to the Treasury. The sanctions follow US President Donald Trump's executive order, signed last week, targeting North Korea's access to the international banking system.

The UN Security Council had already passed a series of tough economic sanctions against Pyongyang following its repeated testing of ballistic missiles and, reportedly, also of a hydrogen bomb. The UN sanctions targeted shipments of oil and other fuel used in missile testing as well as government assets and leaders.

The most recent UN resolution also banned all textile exports from the North and prohibited any country from authorizing new work permits for North Korean workers - two key sources of hard currency for the country.

However, having approved the sanctions, two permanent members of the UNSC - Russia and China - insisted on the US scaling down its belligerent rhetoric toward the North and to pursue negotiations.

Chess

Syria claims it is prepared to discuss post-war autonomy with Kurds, a geo-strategic blow to US, Israel

Walid Muallem
© syrianfreepress.wordpress.comSyrian Deputy PM and FM Walid Muallem
Syria's Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Walid Muallem has stated that once the conflict against terrorist groups is finished in Syria, Damascus will be willing to politically negotiate internal autonomy for Syrian Kurds.

Reuters quotes Muallem, who delivered Syria's address to the United Nations, as stating,
"This topic (Kurdish autonomy) is open to negotiation and discussion and when we are done eliminating Daesh (aka ISIS), we can sit with our Kurdish sons and reach an understanding on a formula for the future".
There are several geo-political implications to this statement.

1. Seizing the initiative from the US occupiers

First and foremost, Muallem's proposals take the wind out of the sails of the United States. As I wrote previously in The Duran, with Syria and Russia quickly securing control over areas east of the River Euphrates, the US is being squeezed out of Syria.

Comment: USA: Time to put the boots in the duffle and go home.


Alarm Clock

Poroshenko signs controversial language bill into law: All schools must now teach only Ukrainian - UPDATE

ukrainian students
© UNIANThe wording of the Ukrainian legislation states that the language of instruction in the first four grades may be in a minority language. By grade five, however, only two or more subjects can be taught in any of the languages of the EU.
Ukraine's president has signed into law a controversial bill that makes Ukrainian the required language of study in state schools from the fifth grade on.

Petro Poroshenko signed the measure on September 25 after days of criticism, particularly from Ukraine's ethnic minorities.

The bill does not outlaw instruction in other languages; students can still learn their native languages as a separate subject.

But that hasn't assuaged the fears of groups such as Poles, Romanians, and Hungarians, all of which have sizable ethnic communities in Ukraine.

Russia has been particularly vociferous in its criticism, with the Foreign Ministry asserted this month that the law was designed to "forcefully establish a mono-ethnic language regime in a multinational state."

Comment: Even CIA-friendly RFE/RL is reporting on the law with some degree of criticism, which is rare for them. (Russia = bad, Ukraine = good.) From another report 2 days ago:
Leshko is not a fan of the bill, which would roll back the option for lessons to be taught in other languages.

"I don't like it. Why? Because, for example, I am a Hungarian. I was studying in a Hungarian school and I want my children also to speak Hungarian," she explained. "Maybe they will move to Hungary or maybe they will go there to earn money. In that case, the Hungarian language will be more useful than Ukrainian, I think."

Leshko is not alone in her animosity toward the legislation. Officials from Poland, Romania, Hungary, and Russia -- all countries with significant ethnic communities in Ukraine -- have all heaped vitriol on it.

...Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto said that Ukraine "stabbed Hungary in the back" with the law.
We understand that this law is primarily directed against the Russian language, because it dominates the capital, the eastern regions. But in Transcarpathia, it hits the national minorities."-- Yaroslav Halas, spokesman for Zakarpattia Oblast governor
...
There are more than 15,000 schools across Ukraine. Of these, according to data from the Ukrainian Education Ministry, Russian is used as the primary language in 581; Romanian in 75; Hungarian in 71; and Polish in five. Some 400,000 students are enrolled at these minority-language schools.

Ethnic Russians make up 17 percent of Ukraine's population of 45 million, according to the World Population Review. Other minorities, including Hungarians, Poles, and Romanians, each make up less than 1 percent of the population.
...
Hennadiy Moskal, the governor of Zakarpattia Oblast, an area in western Ukraine with a sizable Hungarian community, has been one of the more vocal critics of the legislation, claiming it contravenes the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages.
If private individuals in Ukraine, or [Zakarpattia] Governor [Hennadiy] Moskal, want, they can establish a private Hungarian school and fund it."-- Former Justice Minister Serhiy Holovatyy
Yaroslav Halas, a spokesman for Moskal, expressed what some critics suspect may be the target of the bill.

"We understand that this law is primarily directed against the Russian language, because it dominates the capital, the eastern regions. But in Transcarpathia, it hits the national minorities," he told RFE/RL's Ukrainian Service.

"This law is aimed at protecting the Ukrainian language, but mostly against Russian. It is not aimed at protecting the 150,000 Hungarians or several tens of thousands of Romanians who also live in the Chernivtsi region, or the Odesa region, where Moldovans and Gagauzians live," Halas said.
Hungary's FM released a statement in response:
"Hungary will block all steps within the European Union that would represent a step forward in Ukraine's European integration process in the spirit of the Eastern Partnership program," Hungarian Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade Péter Szijjártó said in a statement on Tuesday.
...
Ukraine's Foreign Minister Pavlo Klimkin responded to Hungary's concerns by calling the whole issue a mere "misunderstanding" and offered assurances that Ukraine does care about its citizens of Hungarian origin.

"The meaningful dialog is the way to clear up misunderstandings," Klimkin tweeted, adding that "Ukraine does everything to make our citizens of Hungarian origin feel as comfortable as possible both in the EU and in Ukraine."
Good luck back-peddling on this one, Klimkin!

Update (Sept. 27): The Russian State Duma issued a statement in response:
"The Ukrainian law on education introduces a de-facto ban on getting an education in any language except Ukrainian. It is not a coincidence that the new law has no mention of Russian or other languages used by the peoples of Ukraine. Apart from the official language - Ukrainian - the law only has some regulations concerning teaching in English," according to the text of the statement published on the parliament's website.

The new law constitutes an act of forced Ukrainization that bluntly violates the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages, which was ratified by Ukraine, the State Duma lawmakers wrote.
...
"The so called education reform in Ukraine is targeting primarily the destruction of the remains of Russian-language education with the full assimilation of Russian speakers being the main objectives," the statement reads.

"As they maintain the previous line in the language issue, the Ukrainian authorities again provoke the same situation and recreate the same reasons that had become a starting point for the development of the conflict and the civil war in southeastern Ukraine."



Airplane

U.S. set to curb Open Skies treaty with Russia, Russians say stick to the deal - UPDATE

Russian Tu-214 ON
© Maksim Blinov / SputnikA Russian Tu-214 ON (Open Skies) reconnaissance aircraft designed
The US may scrap a transparency deal with Russia, believing that Moscow is not in compliance with its terms, General Dunford said. Moscow suggested that the Open Skies treaty must be strictly observed by all members.

On Tuesday, the US could announce that it will curb Russian observation flights over American territory under the treaty, the Wall Street Journal reported earlier. The announcement is expected during the meeting of the Open Skies consultative commission in Vienna, the newspaper said. Russian officials said they were aware of the imminent restrictions.

According to the WSJ, the US military see a diminishing value of the treaty, which was negotiated in the early 1990s and came into force in 2002, due to advances of satellite imaging technology.

The treaty allows member states to schedule observation flights over each other's territory to monitor military deployments and is part of a crumbling framework for building trust between Russia and NATO members.

Comment: The Americans have proven themselves time and time again incapable of keeping their promises or abiding by their agreements. They are unreliable and unprofessional. No wonder their empire is crumbling and most of the world despises them.

Update (Sept. 27): Russia's response:
Washington's reported intention to restrict observation flights over the US is yet another example of its tactics to pressure other nations rather than seeking compromise, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov said on Wednesday.

"Obviously, that is not a partnership move. We don't see this treaty as giving any unilateral advantage to any party. The treaty benefits all parties. It's a necessary valuable document, which should be preserved, but the United States is again demonstrating that it prefers the path of pressure," he said.
...
Ryabkov also stated that any restrictive measures taken by the US against Russia would lead to retaliation.

"Before delivering any statements on the issue we will have to analyze the situation together with our military and decide on what form our response to the Americans will take," he said. "But there will be a response, I have no doubt about it."

Earlier on Tuesday, Mikhail Ulyanov, head of the Russian Foreign Ministry's non-proliferation and arms controls department, suggested that the WSJ publication was likely the result of a deliberate leak from the US government.

"This is strange that even before such moves are formalized, the information gets into the press. This is the signature style of the US diplomacy, which sees no distinction between 'megaphone diplomacy' and real politics," he said.



No Entry

Facebook censorship now being spearheaded by the New York Times and the Democrats

facebook censorship
Facebook, the technology giant that controls the world's largest social network, has announced that it will voluntarily turn over information on political advertisements allegedly tied to fake accounts operating out of Russia to the congressional committee investigating Russian "meddling" in the 2016 election.

Those user accounts, according to the New York Times, "promoted inflammatory messages on divisive issues" during the 2016 election. These "inflammatory" messages included, according to the Times, links to articles critical of US foreign policy.

The move by Facebook is a response to a narrative concocted by US intelligence agencies, New York Times "investigations," and officials such as Mark Warner, the top-ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, that the Russian government sought to influence the outcome of the 2016 election by buying about $100,000 in political advertisements.

Comment: See also:


Biohazard

Russia destroys last chemical weapons ahead of schedule - but US is long overdue to destroy its own

chemical weapons
© Reuters
Russia on Wednesday will destroy the last batch of its chemical weapons stockpile, fulfilling its obligation under the convention on prohibition of chemical weapons, the Kremlin announced.

The landmark disposal operation will be conducted at a plant near the village of Kizner in Udmurtia in the Urals, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told journalists.

"We are fulfilling our obligation under the Chemical Weapons Convention to fully destroy our chemical weapons arsenal, and we do it ahead of schedule," he said.

Russia signed the CWC in 1993 and launched a program to dispose of its arsenal in 1996, which allowed it to join the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons (OPCW), the watchdog of the convention, a year later.

At the time Russia declared some 40,000 tons of CW agents in its possession, which it pledged to dispose of by 2020.

Comment: Unfortunately however - and despite the US's demonizing any other country for keeping stockpiles of chemical weapons - the US is hypocritically keeping hold to some of their own supply:
Unlike Russia, the US is not observing its own pledge to dispose of its chemical weapons arsenal, the President Vladimir Putin said ahead of the destruction of the last batch of Russian chemical weapons on Wednesday.

"Russia strictly complies with its international obligations, including those related to non-proliferation and reductions of weapons of mass destruction," Putin said.

"Historically Russia was one of the largest holders of chemical weapons and the US remains one. Unfortunately the US is not observing the deadline for disposing of its chemical weapons. They have pushed the date back three times, citing a lack of funding. This, frankly, sounds strange," he added.

Putin's criticism of the US came as the Russian chemical weapons disposal plant near the village of Kizner, Udmurtia, in the Urals destroyed the last remains of the Russian arsenal.

Footage of the landmark process showed an artillery shell with a note in Russian saying "Farewell to chemical arms" being emptied and decontaminated at an automated production line.

The president said Russia's example in delivering on its promise to destroy its arsenal, which was fully met on Wednesday long before the initial deadline, should encourage other nations to follow suit.

Russia began destroying its chemical weapons arsenal in 1996, shortly before ratifying its accession to the Organization for Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, the watchdog of the convention.

At the time Russia's stockpile of chemical weapons was declared as 40,000 tons, with the US possessing a similar amount.

When the US ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention Treaty in 1997, it agreed to destroy all of its chemical weapons by April 29, 2012. It managed to dispose of about 90 percent of its stockpile by that deadline.

At the moment there are two sites in America still storing chemical weapons. The Pueblo Chemical Depot is expected to complete the destruction by 2019, while the Blue Grass Army Depot is scheduled to start its stockpile's destruction in 2020.



Stock Up

First the critics laughed, then he was dangerous, now Jeremy Corbyn is 'favorite for PM'

Jeremy Corbyn
© Hugo Michiels / Global Look Press
Jeremy Corbyn has a spring in his step at this year's Labour Party Conference. He's gone from fighting for his political survival to preparing to walk into Downing Street. At least that's what his former critics are saying.

In six months the Labour leader has gone from being outrageous outsider to prime minister-in-waiting.

Corbyn will address party delegates in Brighton this week to launch his battle for Downing Street, as tottering Tory Theresa May fends off leadership challenges from within her own cabinet.

And while Brexit goes badly, Labour has every opportunity to seize power.

"Six months ago the opposition was in a battle for survival. Now it is preparing for government," the latest edition of the Economist crows.

Airplane

Washington's crushing 220% tariff on Canadian jets could be start of nasty trade war

Bombardier CS300 Aircraft
© Christinne Muschi / Reuters
Washington has imposed preliminary anti-subsidy duties of 220 percent on Bombardier's C-Series jets. The tariffs were imposed after American rival Boeing accused Canada of unfairly subsidizing Bombardier.

The US government sided with Boeing after the American company filed a complaint that the 110-to-130 seat Bombardier aircraft were dumped below cost in the US market.

According to Boeing, Bombardier sold 75 C-Series jets to Delta below cost, similarly to the tactic used by rival Airbus in the 1990s to grab market share in the United States.

"The US Department of Commerce today affirmed that Bombardier has taken massive illegal subsidies in violation of existing trade law," Boeing said in a statement. "Subsidies enabled Bombardier to dump its product into the US market, harming aerospace workers in the United States and throughout Boeing's global supply chain."

Bombardier called the ruling "absurd and divorced from reality" and accused Boeing of manipulating US trade laws to stifle competition.