Puppet MastersS


Dollars

What Clinton scandal? Professional whore 'Stormy Daniels' sues Trump

stormy daniels
Adult-film star Stormy Daniels has filed a civil suit against President Trump in an effort to void a nondisclosure agreement between the two.

Daniels, whose legal name is Stephanie Clifford, claims in her suit filed Tuesday that the nondisclosure agreement is not valid because Trump never signed the deal, according to documents revealed publicly by her attorney, Michael Avenatti.


Comment: See also:

Trump lawyer Michael Cohen, who allegedly paid off adult film actress Stormy Daniels, demanded refund from Trump for payoff


Briefcase

Rogue states: US govt is suing California over 'sanctuary' laws for illegal immigrants

sacremento protest immigration
© Laura A. Oda/Bay Area News GroupGroups from across the Bay Area gather outside the Kimpton Sawyer Hotel to protest the appearance of U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions at a conference in Sacramento, Calif., on Wednesday, March 7, 2018.
Amid escalating tensions with Washington over immigration raids, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions is traveling to Sacramento to drop a bombshell: The federal government is suing California over its new immigration laws.

The United States is seeking to block three state laws - including its so-called "sanctuary state" policy relating to local law enforcement - that, the lawsuit says, "reflect a deliberate effort by California to obstruct the United States' enforcement of federal immigration law."

When news of the federal lawsuit broke late Tuesday, Gov, Jerry Brown quickly issued a statement decrying the move, as well as Sessions' trip to California.

Comment: See also:


Info

Trump to Swedish Prime Minister: I was right about your "immigration problem"

trump and swedish prime minister
At a joint press conference Tuesday with the Swedish Prime Minister, a Swedish journalist asked President Trump about comments he has made about the influx of Syrian refugees into Sweden and immigration politics.

"You look at what's happening last night in Sweden. Sweden, who would believe this. Sweden. They took in large numbers. They're having problems like they never thought possible. You look at what's happening in Brussels. You look at what's happening all over the world. Take a look at Nice. Take a look at Paris. We've allowed thousands and thousands of people into our country and there was no way to vet those people. There was no documentation. There was no nothing. So we're going to keep our country safe," President Trump said at a campaign-style rally in February 2017, promoting a ban on refugees from Syria.

Trump praised Sweden's "wonderful" prime minister but remarked: "Certainly you have a problem with the immigration, it has caused problems in Sweden."

Comment: See also:


Jet4

The implications of Russia's new weapon systems are still sinking in

Sukhoi T-50 Russia jet
© Alex BeltyukovSukhoi T-50
During the August 2008 Russo-Georgian War, the operations of Russia's 58th Army were termed as "coercion into peace". It is an appropriate term once one recalls what truly was at stake then. Russians did win that war and, indeed, coerced Georgia into a much more peaceful mood. In Clausewitzian terms the Russians achieved the main object of the war by compelling the enemy to do Russia's will. Russians, as the events of the last 19 years showed, have no illusions anymore about the possibility of any kind of reasonable civilized conduct from the combined West, least of all from the United States which still continues to reside in her bubble which insulates her from any outside voices of reason and peace. The American global track record of the last few decades does not require any special elaborations-it is a record of military and humanitarian disasters.

Vladimir Putin's March 1st, 2018 address to Russia's Federal Assembly was not about Russia's upcoming presidential elections, as many in the election-obsessed West suggest. Putin's speech was about coercing America's elites into, if not peace, at least into some form of sanity, given that they are currently completely detached from the geopolitical, military and economic realities of a newly emerging world. As it was the case with Georgia in 2008, the coercion was based on military power. The Pre-Shoigu Russian Army, for all its real and perceived shortcomings, disposed of the US-trained and partially equipped Georgian force in a matter of five days -- the Russian Army's technology, personnel and operational art was simply better. Obviously such a scenario is not possible between Russia and the United States; that is unless the American myth of technological superiority is blown out of the water.

Eye 1

Google working with Pentagon on using AI for combat drone improvement

MQ-9 Reaper Drone
© Gene Blevis/Global Look Press (file photo)
Ubiquitous IT giant Google has silently inked a partnership with the Department of Defense to militarize artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies, reinvigorating fears of a Terminator-style apocalyptic scenario.

Google has been secretly working with the Pentagon in order to help its 1,100-strong fleet of drones to detect images, faces, and behavioral patterns, and plans to scour through massive amounts of video footage in order to improve bombing accuracy for autonomous drones. The endgame is to improve combat performance by automating the decision-making process in locating and targeting combatants, The Intercept reported on Tuesday.

Project Maven was launched in April 2017 to establish an "Algorithmic Warfare Cross-Functional Team," which advocates using sophisticated algorithm-based technologies to combat rising "competitors and adversaries".

Comment: See also: Slaughterbots: AI scientists say ban on killer robots urgently needed


USA

Preventing 'the tyranny of the majority' in America

statue US capitol building
© Joshua Roberts / ReutersCapitol building, Washington, U.S.
People often refer to the United States as a democracy, but technically speaking, that's not true. It's a republic.

Big deal, you say? If you care about your rights, it is. The Founding Fathers knew their history well, so they knew better than to establish the U.S. as a democracy.

In a democracy, of course, the majority rules. That's all well and good for the majority, but what about the minority? Don't they have rights that deserve respect?

Of course they do. Which is why a democracy won't cut it. As the saying goes, a democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.

The Founders were determined to forestall the inherent dangers of what James Madison called "the tyranny of the majority." So they constructed something more lasting: a republic. Something with checks and balances. A system of government carefully balanced to safeguard the rights of both the majority and the minority.

Comment: Interesting point - but let's not go to the extremes that some in the far-left pursue nowadays of granting undue privileges to minorities over the majority with the excuse of historical grievances.


Bell

Ben Garrison: Social media freeway

Social Media Freeway
© Ben Garrison
Last week I made brief appearance on a TV news show out of New York.

The subject was censorship on Twitter. GrrrGraphics lost 2,000 in the sudden and silly 'Russian bot purge,' but we gained most of them back (and more) by the next day. We knew people who were banned for no particular reason other than their connections to conservative leaders on social media. Tweeting pro-Trump messages is intrinsic proof of Russian bots, right? Hillary thinks it is. Such anti-Russia hysteria also diverts attention away from her crimes.

We are one of the few to obtain the coveted blue check mark on Twitter. There was a young man on the news show presumably there for ideological balance. He casually stated that the blue check marks were nothing but status symbols-bragging rights that have little meaning. I was taken aback by his statement, but was unable to summon up the proper reply. After all, public speaking is not my forté. I'd rather draw cartoons.

Attention

Social media censorship is way more dangerous than the censored material

freespeech mouths
© The New York Times
US oligarchs: Russia hacked our election.
Public: Uh oh! What should we do about it?
US oligarchs: Greatly inflate the military budget, sanction US rivals, and censor dissenting opinions.
Public: Umm... aren't those things you've always wanted to do anyway?
US oligarchs: Hush.
I know objecting to internet censorship makes me a right-wing Nazi-kissing literal Hitler in the eyes of many in this bizarre funhouse mirror world of online political discourse, but I insist that censorship by powerful corporations is one of the greatest obstacles we face in our fight to survive and thrive as a species in a world that is increasingly imperiled and dominated.

Comment: Puppet strings. Nothing in government happens by accident. No matter how the clash between the Democrats and Republicans resolves, who goes to jail, who is impeached - the result will be the curbing or negating of the freedom of speech, as defined in this article, as well as ramifications to other freedoms of which we may be yet unaware. The players and the scenarios are incidental to the bigger picture and the insidious agenda for humanity. Curb speech, curb thinking.


Arrow Up

Xi's elevation, Putin's managed democracy

XiPutin
© UnknownPresident Xi and President Putin
China has done away with presidential term limits, suggesting that Xi Jin Ping could rule the country until he dies, provoking a backlash among the country's opposition and taunting in the 'democratic' world. But if you think about it dispassionately, it's amazing that otherwise rational people can believe it's better to have a leader who cannot fulfill his promises than one who can prevent special interests from sabotaging the greater good - as long as he is elected! I understand the lure of 'democracy' ('rule by the people' - in reality in ancient Greece, rule by free, home owning males...). But do most Chinese contest Xi's agenda of making their country an equal player on the world stage while lifting their great numbers out of poverty to become the decade's most ubiquitous tourists?

The label 'authoritarian' is relatively recent and refers to strong leaders who are elected by universal suffrage but whose 'authority' allows them to pursue goals that are in the interests of the majority. In Russia, after some house-cleaning following a disastrous decade under Boris Yeltsin, who literally gave away the store, Vladimir Putin made it clear to those who benefited, known as oligarchs, that they were free to continue business as usual, as long as they didn't get in the way of his plans to bring his country up to Western living standards while resisting its social agenda.

Comment: Russia and China, in the context of 'managed democracy,' may offer the oligarchy and the working class a framework where both benefit and remain relevant. Unlike the US where democracy - in its purported and idealistic form - grows increasingly imbalanced as foundational rights of the people ebb and vanish, as lies and illusions to control the message prevail. Managed democracy - a better version? We shall see. Time and vigilance shall tell.


Star of David

Isn't it time for AIPAC to register as a foreign agent?

AIPAC
© WJLA/KJN
This weekend, 18,000 Americans from all over the country are coming to Washington to participate in the annual American Israel Public Affairs Committee Policy Conference.

AIPAC is one of the leading forces behind the Israel lobby, joined in recent years by the ascending Christians United for Israel. Other Jewish "pro-Israel" organizations are niche affairs, representing particular constituencies on the left or right. But it's AIPAC that is the registered lobby on Capitol Hill, and it is AIPAC whose clout on matters relating to Israel exceeds the clout of the National Rifle Association on matters related to guns; while the NRA's sway is almost entirely over Republicans, AIPAC has historically drawn its support from both parties. Is there any place but AIPAC that not only gets Mike Pence, Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi in the same room, but also gets to hear them in near total agreement?

But there's something strange, too, about AIPAC. Consider Vice President Mike Pence's remarks at last year's conference:
"Every freedom-loving American stands with Israel - because her cause is our cause, her values are our values and her fight is our fight."
How can America's representatives declare that any other country's fight - even one as close to us as Israel is - is our fight, its cause our cause, its values our values?

Comment: The wolf has long been in the hen house and stolen all the eggs. Have the mesmerized chickens noticed they only feed the master?