Puppet MastersS

Gold Coins

Venezuela's oil-backed cryptocurrency will be convertible to yuan, rubles, liras and euros

Euro
© Pavel Lisitsyn / Sputnik
The so-called 'petro' digital currency, which was successfully launched by Venezuela last month, will be traded for several global currencies, including the Russian ruble.

"Starting March 23, all legal and physical entities will be able to purchase the petro directly... within the next 15 days for convertible currencies: yuan, rubles, Turkish liras and euro," said Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro.

He described these are the most important currencies for "the economic future of the planet."

Maduro said state companies that are exporting goods, such as the country's energy giant PDVSA, can already trade for petro. "PDVSA and those enterprises that trade for foreign currency are authorized from now on to receive 'el petro' for their export deliveries," he said, adding that they will be able to supply products for the Venezuelan cryptocurrency "to all countries and enterprises in the world."

Radar

China slams US decision to sail warship through disputed South China Sea

USS Mustin
© U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Pat MorrisseyUSS Mustin (November 15, 2017, off the coast of Japan)
Beijing condemned a US Navy freedom of navigation operation on Friday that sent a Arleigh-Burke class guided missile destroyer near disputed islets in the South China Sea.

China's Defense Ministry stated March 23 that the United States harmed China's sovereignty and jeopardized its security by conducting the operation earlier that day. The ministry accused the US of having conducted a "serious military provocation."

Specifically, the USS Mustin, whose motto is "Always Be Bold," cruised within 12 nautical miles of Mischief Reef in the Spratly archipelago, US officials told Reuters. The atoll was once a fisherman's shelter yet has evolved into a full on military base with the help of China's artificial island construction activities.

Comment: Beijing insists that the repeated dispatch of US warships to the South China Sea is "undermining regional peace and stability" and hurting bilateral relations.
China has lodged a protest with the United States after an American destroyer USS Mustin sailed near disputed islands in the South China Sea.

Beijing demands an end to US "provocations actions which violate the sovereignty of the People's Republic and pose a serious threat to its security, a Foreign Ministry spokeswoman said in Beijing.

Briefing reporters on Friday, ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying called on Washington to respect regional countries' efforts aimed at securing peace and stability in the South China Sea.
See also: US-China trade war: Trump imposes $60bn in tariffs, China vows to fight to the end, US says 'buy more American gas' to avoid more


Eye 2

SOTT Focus: Why Boris Johnson is Lying in Skripal Case

boris johnson
Evidence submitted by the British government in court today proves, beyond any doubt, that Boris Johnson has been point blank lying about the degree of certainty Porton Down scientists have about the Skripals being poisoned with a Russian "novichok" agent.

Yesterday in an interview with Deutsche Welle Boris Johnson claimed directly Porton Down had told him they positively identified the nerve agent as Russian:
You argue that the source of this nerve agent, Novichok, is Russia. How did you manage to find it out so quickly? Does Britain possess samples of it?

Let me be clear with you ... When I look at the evidence, I mean the people from Porton Down, the laboratory ...

So they have the samples ...

They do. And they were absolutely categorical and I asked the guy myself, I said, "Are you sure?" And he said there's no doubt.
I knew and had published from my own whistleblowers that this is a lie. Until now I could not prove it. But today I can absolutely prove it, due to the judgement at the High Court case which gave permission for new blood samples to be taken from the Skripals for use by the OPCW.

Eye 2

Pulling one veil back on the Deep State

Cambridge Analytical
© Bryan Bedder/Getty ImagesAlexander Nix, chief executive of Cambridge Analytica, at the Concordia Summit for public-private business partnerships in New York in September. The firm claimed to have developed psychographic profiles that could predict the political leanings of every American adult.
I confess I found it difficult to get worked up about the Cambridge Analytica affair. My reactions was "What awful people. But surely everybody realises that is what Facebook does?". It seemed to me hardly news, on top of which the most likely outcome is that it will be used as yet another excuse to introduce government controls on the internet and clamp down on dissenting views like those on this website, where 85% of all traffic comes through Facebook or Twitter.

But two nights ago my interest was piqued when, at the height of Cambridge Analytica's domination of the news cycle, the BBC gave it considerably less airtime than the alcohol abuse problems of someone named Ant. The evening before, the BBC had on Newsnight given the CEO of Cambridge Analytica the most softball interview imaginable. If the BBC is obviously downplaying something, it is usually defending a deep British Establishment interest.

It took me a minute to find out that Cambridge Analytica is owned by a British company, SCL Ltd, which in effect does exactly the same activities in the UK that Cambridge Analytica was undertaking in the US. I then looked up SCL on Bloomberg.

Black Cat

Theresa May roasted on Twitter for 'delusional' claim that Tories saved 1 million from poverty

london poverty britain
© Gail Orenstein / Global Look Press
Theresa May faces accusations of twisting reality as she tweeted that 1 million people have been lifted out of "absolute poverty" since the Tories gained power. The PM was branded "deluded" over the state of Britain, on Twitter.

The Tory leader's tweet on Friday was met with an angry response by people claiming she was being misleading. Some on Twitter suggested the PM is living in a parallel universe, while others accused her of shirking responsibility to her citizens.

Comment: From Wikipedia:
A zero-hour contract is a type of contract between an employer and a worker, where the employer is not obliged to provide any minimum working hours, while the worker is not obliged to accept any work offered. The employee may sign an agreement to be available for work as and when required, so that no particular number of hours or times of work are specified

[...]

Workers subject to zero-hour contracts are vulnerable to exploitation as they may be denied work at any time for any reason, including declining to respond to a demand to work. A refusal to work in any one instance for any reason can result in a prolonged period of lack of work. In 2014, millions of workers were still trapped in low-paid, highly insecure jobs, where mistreatment is the norm and where there is limited prospect of escape, said the Trade Union Congress. Due to the uncertainty of the workers' schedules zero-hour contracts present problems for workers with children due to the difficulty of arranging child care.
The gilded age of robber barons has returned.


Vader

Trump signs $1.3 TRILLION spending bill - No longer resembles man who was elected president

trump
© Jonathan Ernst / Reuters
A US government shutdown has been avoided as President Donald Trump signed the $1.3 trillion omnibus spending bill. Trump had earlier threatened to veto the legislation over immigration issues.

Trump tweeted Friday morning that he was considering blocking the bill because of a lack of funding for the Mexican border wall and because 800,000 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) immigrants aren't even mentioned in the legislation.

"DACA was abandoned by the Democrats. Very unfair to them! Would have been tied to desperately needed Wall," the president added. He eventually signed the bill in a White House press conference at 1pm local time on Friday.

Speaking at the press conference, Trump said recent budget cuts have put America at risk and it was a matter of national security to sign the bill. Describing the rushed manner in which the legislation was passed as "ridiculous," he said he will "never" sign a bill like this again.

Comment: Deeper into the hole the US goes.


Bullseye

Kremlin spokesman Peskov: Western media have abused their monopoly and manipulate audiences

uk newspapers
© Simon Belcher / Global Look Press
Media outlets based in the US and Britain have long enjoyed dominance in the global news market and have abused their position to manipulate audiences, a Kremlin spokesman told RT in an exclusive interview.

Russia is currently being targeted by an unprecedented campaign in the West, aimed at undermining its resurgence, Dmitry Peskov told RT's Sophie Shevardnadze. The media are playing a major part in it, as they are selling an anti-Russian narrative to the people of Western nations. But what those outlets do is a disservice to their audiences, he argued.

"People are naked against these media wars. They are victims of these media wars," he said. "They are being... driven into a certain way of emotions without even understanding that."

Bad Guys

Snowden describes deep state's influence on US presidents Obama, Trump

DeepState
© Stone Cold Truth
Famed whistleblower Edward Snowden was recently interviewed by Italian publication La Repubblic. The publication noted the 5-year mark of Snowden's historic act of blowing the whistle on the NSA's expansive surveillance programs and that "many thought he would end up very badly, but when he connects via videolink for this interview with La Repubblica, he seems to be doing very well: the frank smile and peaceful face of someone who is easy in his mind."

In an excerpt from the exclusive interview, Snowden explained how the presidencies of both Obama and Trump are shaped by the Deep State following an illuminating question by journalist Stefania Maurizi.

Stefania Maurizi: We saw that President Obama, who was an outsider to the US military-intelligence complex, initially wanted to reign in the abuses of agencies like the CIA and the NSA, but in the end he did very little. Now we see a confrontation between president Trump and so-called Deep State, which includes the CIA and the NSA. Can a US president govern in opposition to such powerful entities?

Edward Snowden: Obama is certainly an instructive case. This is a president who campaigned on a platform of ending warrantless wiretapping in the United States, he said "that's not who we are, that's not what we do," and once he became the president, he expanded the program. He said he was going to close Guantanamo but he kept it open, he said he was going to limit extrajudicial killings and drone strikes that has been so routine in the Bush years. But Obama went on to authorize vastly more drone strikes than Bush. It became an industry.

Comment: No guarantees bucking the system would let a president live another day. Looks like Trump is following the pack, caving to 'the power'. He needs a shadow government of his own.


Vader

Trump was anti-Iraq war, but Bolton may be just the start of a U-turn

Trumpback
© Telegraph.co.uk
Despite being elected on an anti-interventionist program, Donald Trump has now surrounded himself with foreign policy hawks and Iraq war apologists. The new National Security Adviser, John Bolton, is just one of the wild bunch.

Back in his pre-election days Trump was a vocal critic of American military adventurism. Notably in 2013, he outright said on Twitter "All former Bush administration officials should have zero standing on Syria. Iraq was a waste of blood & treasure."

Fast forward to 2018, and Trump is picking the likes of John Bolton - an Iraq war apologist and an advocate for starting more wars of the kind - to his team of advisers. While Bolton is known as extremely hawkish even by neocon standards, he is not the sole example in the cabinet. Both Trump's security and foreign policy teams are now full of people who backed the Iraq disaster and are now in favor of military action against Iran and North Korea.

Comment: And...we are going down the rabbit hole, executive-head first.


Star of David

Israeli DM Lieberman regrets declassifying details of 2007 strike on Syrian nuclear facility

Israeli plane&men
© IDF/ReutersPhoto from 2007 Israeli air strike on Syrian nuclear reactor site near Deir al-Zor.
Israel's Defense Minister expressed regret for approving the release of details on the 2007 airstrike on a Syrian "nuclear reactor", calling the media fallout and officials' rush to claim credit for the operation an embarrassment.

After a decade of censorship, on Wednesday morning Avigdor Lieberman finally decided to lift the veil of secrecy, allowing the Israeli Air Force (IAF) to release the details of the aerial mission which destroyed an alleged nuclear reactor under construction in Syria's Deir ez-Zor back in September 2007. The decision to conduct a strike on foreign soil, according to the IAF, was based on surveillance gathered by the Military Intelligence Directorate who had been monitoring the activity at the Syrian site for two years.

After Tel Aviv finally officially admitted to "destroying a nuclear facility in its last stages of construction," the race to claim credit for the success of the operation by senior members of the Israeli defense establishment made Defense Minister Lieberman regret his decision to declassify the details of the airstrike.



Comment: National security interests or an act of war...which, hmmm, could it be? Neither. It is 'an embarrassment'! And Israeli generals are fighting over who can claim fame and proud of it. Despicable.

See also: Israeli military admits it carried out 2007 raid on Syrian nuclear reactor