Puppet MastersS


Rocket

UN warning: EU to be most affected by possible INF treaty collapse

rocket launch USS Barry
© Flickr/US Department of DefenseThe guided missile destroyer USS Barry (DDG52) launches a Tomahawk cruise missile.
Europe would be most vulnerable to any negative consequences of the potential collapse of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF Treaty), UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said on Monday at the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, stressing the inadmissibility of a new arms race.
"The demise of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, should it be allowed to happen, would make the world a more insecure and unstable place. That insecurity and instability will be keenly felt here in Europe. We simply cannot afford to return to the unrestrained nuclear competition of the darkest days of the Cold War."
The UN chief also called on Russia and the United States to use the time remaining before the agreement's official termination to engage in a sincere dialogue on issues relating to the deal.

"It is very important that this treaty is preserved," Guterres stressed.

Comment: See also:


Arrow Down

To be peace at last? US Democrats introduce bill to provide formal end to the Korean War

Korean War banner
© Reuters/Kim Hong-Ji
US House Democrats have introduced a bill calling for a formal end to the Korean War - which never really ended even when both sides stopped shooting - on the eve of President Trump's summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un.

Acknowledging that "the persistence of a state of war represents a constant risk and threat to the national security of the United States and its allies," the bill calls on Trump to declare an end to the "state of war with North Korea" and recommends "serious, urgent diplomatic engagement" in pursuit of a binding peace agreement between all three countries. It does not, however, call for the withdrawal of the 28,000 American troops stationed in South Korea, or make any recommendations regarding the repeal of sanctions on the North.

Comment: See also:


X

As voice after voice is purged from social media, still think there's no censorship?

Free speech sign
© Global Look Press/Creative Touch Imaging Ltd
For a civilization that considers freedom of speech one of its fundamental principles and universal human rights, the West sure does a lot of censorship - and no, farming it out to 'private companies' does not change what it is.

It happened again on Tuesday: British activist Tommy Robinson was erased from Facebook and Instagram. The social media behemoth said it has to act "when ideas and opinions cross the line and amount to hate speech that may create an environment of intimidation and exclusion for certain groups in society."

As online polemicists are fond of saying, "citation needed!" Yet Facebook offers none: no evidence of specific violations, not even a definition of "hate speech," just an arbitrary standard - and a threat of further bans for people who "support... hate figures." Whatever that means.

Binoculars

Taliban spokesman says close to reaching withdrawal agreement with US

taliban delegation
© Qatari Foreign Ministry / AFPQatari officials (center) take part in a meeting between U.S. special envoy Zalmay Khalilzad (second from left) and the U.S. delegation, and Sher Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai (sixth from the right) and the Taliban delegation, in Doha on February 26.
A spokesman for the Afghan Taliban has said the group is close to reaching an agreement with the United States on the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan.

Spokesman Suhail Shaheen made the comment in Doha, Qatar, following the second day of negotiations with U.S. special envoy Zalmay Khalilzad on February 26.

"If we do not reach a solution in this round of talks, then we will in the next round of talks," he told AP.

Khalilzad's past rounds of talks with the Taliban focused on U.S. troop withdrawal in exchange for guarantees of no attacks against the United States, but it was unclear how close he was on a deal on those issues.

He said that in exchange for a U.S. withdrawal, the Taliban would offer guarantees that Afghanistan would not be used as a staging area for anti-American attacks.

Star of David

Batya Ungar-Sargon, delusions of Liberal Zionism

Baruch Marzel
© UnknownJewish Power party member Baruch Marzel
This weekend, mainstream Israel lobby organizations condemned the far-right Jewish Power party, which Prime Minister Netanyahu helped secure a place in a future coalition. This included AIPAC, who affirmed that "AIPAC has a longstanding policy not to meet with members of this racist and reprehensible party".

For Forward editor Batya Ungar-Sargon, this meant a revitalizing of her "Liberal Zionist dream", and she spoke on behalf of the "American Jewish imagination":
In the American Jewish imagination, Zionism is the promise that Jewish safety can coexist with Jewish values like justice, welcoming the stranger, and equality. And if the State of Israel hasn't been able to completely live up to that perhaps dialectical standard, for American Jews, this was not because of something inherent in its character, as the anti-Zionists would have it, but rather due to tragic circumstances, circumstances that surely will end soon enough. That is the liberal Zionist dream. And in betraying it so severely and so explicitly, Netanyahu just revitalized it. By destroying the illusion that his Israel could be their Israel, Netanyahu reminded American Jews of what their Israel is supposed to be - and what it's not and never will be under his leadership.
Notice how Ungar-Sargon finds it centrally important to mention anti-Zionism? She sees this moment as discrediting anti-Zionists because pro-Israeli lobbies criticized Israel, which shows that Zionists are complex and not a monolith.

This is very similar in feeling to New York Times columnist Bari Weiss, who was also over the moon about this, tweeting:
This is Jewish leadership. And it exposes the strawman erected by anti-Zionists: That legitimate criticism of Israel is smeared as anti-Semitic. This is criticism of Israel. No one mistakes it for something else.

Light Sabers

India-Pakistan crisis rundown: 'Neither can afford a miscalculation' - PM Khan

india pakistan
© REUTERS / Danish IsmailIndian soldiers stand next to the wreckage of Indian Air Force's helicopter after it crashed in Budgam district in Kashmir February 27, 2019.
New Delhi and Islamabad cannot afford a new war with the weapons they now have, Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan said, adding that he and Indian PM Narendra Modi have to find a way out of the ongoing security crisis.

In a short televised address on Wednesday, Khan said neither he nor his Indian counterpart, Narendra Modi, would be in control of the situation, if the ongoing hostilities escalate further.

"History tells us that wars are full of miscalculation. My question is that given the weapons we have, can we afford miscalculation? We should sit down and talk."

Comment: RT provides more details on the recent confrontations between the two countries:
India v Pakistan: What you need to know about Kashmir flare-up that may push nuclear rivals to war

Tension is escalating rapidly between nuclear-armed neighbors India and Pakistan after air combat between the rivals ended with the reported loss of aircraft by both nations.

The ongoing flare-up started on February 14 with the suicide bombing of Indian police troops in Kashmir, a divided region in the north that has been contested by Islamabad and New Delhi since 1947.

Some 40 people were reportedly killed in the attack. The militant group Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), that wants all of Kashmir to become part of Pakistan, claimed credit for the attack, which was the deadliest in decades.

Indian air raid

Early on Tuesday morning, the Indian military aircraft crossed into Pakistani airspace for a raid against what India called a JeM training camp. Indian Foreign Secretary Vijay Gokhale said "a very large number" of JeM fighters were killed in the raid, which targeted an area near the town of Balakot in the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan.
Kashmir map
"The existence of such training facilities, capable of training hundreds of jihadis, could not have functioned without the knowledge of the Pakistani authorities," Gokhale said. Indian media claimed as many as 300 militants had been killed.

The town is located some 50km (32 miles) from the UN-mandated Line of Control (LoC) in Kashmir, which serves as the de facto border in the disputed region. India hasn't launched incursions that deep into Pakistani territory since the war of 1971, the bloodiest conflict fought by the two nations.

Pakistan pledges retaliation

Pakistan, which denies harboring jihadists, rejected India's justification for the attack, which was that Islamabad refused to deal with JeM insurgency on its own.

Pakistani military denied Indian claims of mass casualties on the ground, saying Indian jets dropped their munitions in a desolated area while being chased away by Pakistani warplanes. Neither side's version of events could be corroborated independently.

Islamabad condemned the incursion into its airspace and said it reserved the right to retaliate against India at a time and place of its choosing.

On Tuesday evening, there were reports by Indian officials of heavy artillery shelling coming from the Pakistani side injuring several Indian troops in Kashmir.

Islamabad strikes back

The promised retaliation materialized on Wednesday and has brought with it as much confusion over what exactly happened as events on Tuesday. Pakistan stated that its aircraft attacked targets across the LoC, but stayed in Pakistani airspace.

Pakistan has "taken strikes at non military target, avoiding human loss and collateral damage," the country's Foreign Ministry said in a statement. "Sole purpose being to demonstrate our right, will and capability for self defense."

Then, according to the Pakistani side, the Indian Air Force launched its aircraft into Pakistan's airspace. In the ensuing fight, two Indian aircraft were shot down, and two pilots captured.


India says both nations lost aircraft on Wednesday

The Indian government took a pause before commenting on the developments on Wednesday. An Indian official based in Kashmir told Reuters that at least three Pakistani aircraft violated the border and were confronted by Indian fighter jets deployed to intercept them.

There were also claims in the Indian media that a Pakistani F-16 fighter jet was shot down and crashed in the Rajouri district of Kashmir - presumably by the Indian Air Force responding to an incursion.

Hours later, the Indian Foreign Ministry confirmed that the air force lost one of its MiG-21s during an engagement with Pakistani forces. Its pilot is listed as missing in action, Raveesh Kumar, the spokesman for the ministry, said.

He added that one Pakistani fighter jet was shot down by the Indian side, falling on the Pakistani side of the border. He stressed that the Pakistani aircraft were targeting Indian military installations on the ground.

At least one other Indian aircraft crashed on Wednesday in Budgam, a district in the India-controlled part of Kashmir. However it was not a fighter jet but rather a Mi-17 helicopter, which reportedly went down due to a malfunction while returning to base. The Pakistani military said it did not engage that aircraft. The helicopter was earlier misidentified as a MiG-21 fighter jet in some media reports.

Security concerns

Amid the flare-up, air traffic was shut down on both sides of the LoC. Airports in the cities of Amritsar, Pathankot, Jammu, Leh and Chandigarh have been shut down and all flights canceled on the Indian side. Pakistan closed its entire airspace to flights amid the tension.


The move is a clear indicator that both countries fear further escalation of hostilities after two days of exchanges of fire. Both governments publicly stated they want to defuse the tensions though.

Several nations, including the US, China and Russia, as well as the European Union issued calls for restraint addressed to Islamabad and New Delhi.
Analysts question India's motivation in retaliating in the way they have:
Domestic posturing or true escalation? Analyst fears new Kashmir incident prelude to global conflict
Indian soldiers
© REUTERS/Danish IsmaiIndian soldiers stand next to the wreckage of Indian Air Force's helicopter after it crashed in Budgam district in Kashmir February 27, 2019.
India's raid into Pakistan was a calculated provocation, and if New Delhi isn't just playing to its home electorate, major world powers will be dragged into a war, a political analyst tells RT.

"What would they expect to happen? They are quite aware of Pakistan's right to defend its territory. What is India hoping to gain?" Darius Shahtahmasebi, a New Zealand-based political analyst, says.

"Either India is making a statement, posturing for its domestic population that it is doing something about Kashmir. Or they are actually trying to escalate the issue further, because they know that eventually Pakistan will respond"

While Islamabad preached "restraint" on Wednesday, if it does strike back, India could unleash a full-scale war. And Shahtahmasebi believes that even if the two countries decide to leave their nuclear arsenals off the table and engage in conventional localized warfare, the impact will be global.

He notes that Pakistan is the nexus of Saudi geopolitical ambitions in the area, and India is a rising superpower, able to rely on support from Western allies. For China, the region is the main artery for its ambitious One Belt-One Road project.

"It's not a minor conflict the rest of the world can close its eyes to. It would bring in China, it would bring in Saudi Arabia, it would bring in the United States, though as a former or current ally of both adversaries, it is now unclear quite where it stands during the Trump administration," Shahtahmasebi told RT.
Local celebrities weigh in on the dispute:
'Mess with the best, die like the rest': Pakistan & Indian celebs split on Twitter as tensions rise

Fahad Mustafa; (R) Mahira Khan
© Wikimedia Commons(L) Fahad Mustafa; (R) Mahira Khan
As tensions escalate between India and Pakistan, celebrities in both countries have hit Twitter to show support for their armies, although many famous faces are also calling urgently for peace.

Pakistani actress Mahira Khan said there was "nothing uglier," and "nothing more ignorant" than cheering for war. Meanwhile, Mawra Hocane tweeted a Christopher Holliday quote saying there can be "NO winners in war," and called on the media to "stop being provocative."

Fahad Mustafa, a Pakistani actor, echoed their push for peace, saying "war does not determine who is right...only who is left."




Not everyone was calling for peace, however. Pakistani actor Hamza Ali Abbasi tweeted: "Well done India. Much improvement from the fake 'Surgical Strike' claim," before calling on Pakistan's forces to retaliate.



Indian actor and director Ajay Devgn showed his support for the Indian army, with a strongly-worded tweet, saying: "Mess with the best, die like the rest. Salute #IndianAirForce."


Responding to a tweet by MP Rahul Gandhi saluting pilots of the Indian Air Force, actor and former chairman of the Film and Television Institute of India Anupam Kher said: "Today will be a good day to start saluting Prime Minister Narendra Modi too."



Celebrities like actor Mohanlal Viswanathan and ordinary Indians alike are tweeting a play on a popular phrase from a recent Bollywood movie, Uri: The Surgical Strike, "How's the josh?" Instead of 'josh' they are asking, "How's the Jaish?" referring to India's strikes on Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM). They then answer their own question with the quip: "Dead sir."

Most analysts don't believe this will escalate much further:
Nuclear Armageddon v new-found equilibrium: How far can current Indo-Pakistani confrontation go?

There remains the risk that the tensions between two bitter rivals will result in the worst-case scenario, Sultan Mehmood Hali, a retired group commander of the Pakistan Air Force, told RT.


"If pushed against the wall... Pakistan will be forced to retaliate with nuclear weapons, which could, of course, lead to very serious destruction in the region," he said.

"Unfortunately, once you have this kind of weapons on both sides and if there is a desperate situation, then a desperate situation will lead to desperate measures."

"We don't want this to escalate to mutually assured destruction," Hali said, while admitting that his nation would be at a disadvantage in an all-out fight.

"India is the superior power. Its armed forces are three times the size of Pakistan's. Its economy is much broader. It can sustain a lot of hits," the Air Force veteran said.

"Pakistan, being the weaker country, will be on the receiving end."

Agreeing with the last point, the former foreign secretary of India, Kanwal Sibal, noted that Pakistan is in "no position to have an all-out war unless it wants self-destruction." The Muslim-majority country is in the midst of "a terrible financial crisis," seeking assistance from the World Bank, the ex-diplomat said.

He added that the US and Pakistan's longtime ally in the region, China, called on the parties to maintain restraint, but the nation "disregarded that." Speaking to RT, Harsh V. Pant, professor of international relations at King's College London, noted that the politicians in New Delhi and Islamabad are not "so suicidal" to push a conflict "to a nuclear level."

"I don't think it is in the interest of both sides to take it beyond a certain point, given that both are nuclear-weapon states. After the initial bout of instability... we will find equilibrium."


Professor Pant said that India "was cognizant of the risks" when conducting Tuesday's air raid over its neighbor's territory. Pakistani-based jihadist group Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) has stepped up attacks across the border in recent years, including a convoy bombing two week ago, which killed 44 Indian police officers.

"The feeling in India after being struck every single year and month with terrorism is 'enough is enough,'" he said.

"India has now put the ball squarely in Pakistan's court."

The government in New Delhi justified the airstrikes on Pakistan's territory by claiming that Islamabad doesn't do anything to combat terrorists.

Addressing India's concern, Sultan Mehmood Hali said New Delhi should share "actionable intelligence" on the terrorist groups with Pakistan. "Our prime minister [Imran Khan] has assured: we will take definite action," he told RT.
While a major consumer of Bollywood movies, Pakistan will attempt to introduce an official ban on them:
'No Indian movie will be released': Pakistan bans Bollywood films & ads after air raid

Pakistani Information and Broadcasting Minister Fawad Chaudhry has ordered an embargo on all Indian-made films and advertisements, following India's air strike in its territory on Tuesday.

Chaudhry announced the boycott on Twitter.


The ban is the latest setback in the always-fragile cultural relations between the two neighbors.
Finally:
India to 'isolate' Pakistan after suicide car bomb attack on police convoy kills 44

"We believe art and films are universal languages that transcend borders and bring people closer. We hope we can all play a positive role in reducing tensions, and supporting policies that bring peace and prosperity to the people of the entire region," said All Pakistan Exhibitors Association Chairman Zoraiz Lashari in a statement.
Indian soldiers
© REUTERS / Younis KhaliqIndian soldiers examine the debris after an explosion in Lethpora in south Kashmir's Pulwama district February 14, 2019.



indian soldiers
© REUTERS / Younis Khaliq
For more on the behind the scenes maneuvering, see: Pakistan-India showdown: What you're not being told


Laptop

Russian national security chief: Russia willing to work with US on cybersecurity, but they're still stalling

internet data web
© Global Look Press
The Russian government is willing to cooperate with the US on cybersecurity issues, but so far it sees no reciprocation of this intention on the other side, said the head of Russia's National Security Committee.

"On our part, we are prepared to dialogue with our Western partners, once there is responsiveness and a real interest in solving the issues we have accumulated," Nikolai Patrushev said in an interview.

He added that at the moment there is virtually no progress in this regard. "The US suggested discussing the problems in 2018, but then they derailed a planned Russian-American interagency consultation by failing to send a delegation to Geneva."

Comment: There's a simple reason the U.S. won't cooperate with the Russians on cybersecurity: they're the biggest cyber-criminals on the planet, and any treaty on the subject would automatically put them in violation of whatever the terms would be. Just like with the INF, the Americans accuse the Russians of violations when they themselves are the ones acting in bad faith.


Blackbox

Did Iran's FM resign after contention between Rouhani and IRGC?

Javad Zarif
© Reuters/David MdzinarishviliIranian FM Javad Zarif
Amid Iranian media reports of the country's lawmakers signing a letter asking President Hassan Rouhani not to accept Foreign Minister Javad Zarif's resignation, the ministry's spokesperson revealed that the request has not been accepted so far.

Sputnik discussed the possible reasons Iran's top diplomat resigned, and how this could impact Tehran's internal and foreign policy, with Dr. Ali Bakeer, an Ankara-based political analyst specialising in Turkey's foreign policy, Iran and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries.

Sputnik: What's your impression of Zarif's sudden resignation announcement?

Ali Bakeer: Many observers anticipated that Zarif might have to resign at a certain point but no one expected that his resignation would be announced on Instagram during the official visit of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to Iran.

The direct reason for Zarif's resignation is widely attributed to not informing his ministry of the visit and not allowing him personally to attend any of the official meetings, during which Assad met with Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and President Hassan Rouhani.

However, I think the resignation came after a long period of frustration and as a result of the contention between the political/diplomatic approach of Rouhani's government towards regional issues on the one hand, and the security/IRGC approach which is usually endorsed by the Supreme Leader on the other.

Bad Guys

Cohen leaks to NYT: Will call Trump "racist", "con man" and "cheat" in Wednesday testimony - not a peep about 'Russian collusion'

michael cohen
"Not looking good, Mr. Cohen."
Former Trump attorney Michael Cohen - who will soon head to prison after pleading guilty to eight criminal charges - will testify to Congress on Wednesday that President Trump is a "con man" and a cheat," according to a copy of his opening statement given to the New York Times.

Cohen will say that while Trump was "intoxicating" to be around, and "When you were in his presence, you felt like you were involved in something greater than yourself -- that you were somehow changing the world," that the president is actually a 'racist, conman and a cheat.'

Comment: As Cohen is trying desperately to cover his posterior, RT notes some glaring blanks in his testimony so far:
US President Donald Trump's former lawyer Michael Cohen, giving testimony on Capitol Hill, has not been able to provide any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials during the 2016 election.

Cohen has been giving testimony described as "explosive" by mainstream media to the House Oversight Committee about his "suspicions" that Trump could have worked with Russia during the campaign - but when probed, was not able to provide any evidence to back up those suggestions.

CBS reporter Bo Erickson tweeted during the hearing that Cohen "cannot cite any real examples of Russian collusion" with the Trump campaign "even though he was one of [Trump's] closest allies."

"If [Cohen] doesn't know about any collusion, who does?" Erickson tweeted.


Republicans on the committee have castigated Democrats for inviting a "convicted perjurer," who they say cannot be trusted, to give testimony. Cohen pleaded guilty last November to making false statements to Congress about a potential deal to build a Trump Tower hotel in Moscow, later admitting that he lied to "protect" Trump.

During the hearing, Rep. Jim Jordan accused Cohen of being aggrieved with Trump because he didn't get a job at the White House - a claim which Cohen denied.


While Republicans immediately took an adversarial tone with Cohen, Democrats on the committee have been pushing him to produce information implicating Trump in a conspiracy to steal the election with help from Russia.

Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings said Democrats will continue to call Trump's associates before Congress to testify in their "search for the truth" for the foreseeable future, taking advantage of the fact that the party now holds majority powers in the House of Representatives.

Tweeting before the hearing, Trump himself accused Cohen of "lying in order to reduce his prison time."




Light Sabers

Ivanka Trump challenges Ocasio-Cortez platform - Americans want to earn their living, not be given a gov't handout

Ivanka Trump
© Yuri Gripas | Reuters
Ivanka Trump, President Trump's daughter and a White House senior adviser, lauded her father's economy and said the majority of Americans ideologically believe differently than Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., in an interview with Fox News host Steve Hilton.

"You've got people who will see that offer from the Democrats, from the progressive Democrats, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: 'Here's the Green New Deal, here's the guarantee of a job,' and think, 'yeah, that's what I want, it's that simple.' What do you say to those people?" Hilton asked Ivanka Trump in the interview set to air in full on Sunday.

"I don't think most Americans, in their heart, want to be given something. I've spent a lot of time traveling around this country over the last 4 years. People want to work for what they get," Trump told Hilton. "So, I think that this idea of a guaranteed minimum is not something most people want. They want the ability to be able to secure a job. They want the ability to live in a country where's there's the potential for upward mobility."