The case of Claas Relotius, an award winning
Spiegel writer, who was caught writing fiction and selling it as true stories, seemed to be a game changer in the world of journalism. Yet it soon became just yesterday's news. And, as Thomas Beschorner of the University of St. Gallen in Switzerland,
wrote, it was surprising in the first place that people found the lying in the media so surprising. "Scientists manipulate results of research, managers lie.
We know all that happens. Everywhere, but not in journalism?"
Somewhat paradoxically, given his suggestion that lying was routine and common, the same Prof. Beschorner continued: "Whether this is an isolated case, or the problem is systemic and therefore widespread, we don't know yet."
Then a similar case was discovered. An award winning contributor to
Sueddeutsche Zeitung Magazine, Dirk Gieselmann, had invented a main protagonist in a story he wrote. The
SZ stated the forgery had taken place, but revealed few details, while suggesting the case was not as severe as that of Relotius.
One way or another,
do two known recent cases of fictitious journalism in Germany make the problem systemic? But what about the infamous
fake news? And
alternative facts? Those have been around for a while. Is that something totally different from making up plots and characters as in the above mentioned cases?
Even though it was Donald Trump who was credited with creating the fake-news brand, it was largely applied to his own statements, as well as various stories, posts and tweets coming out of Russia, on its behalf, in favour of its perceived friends, and against its perceived enemies.
Comment: See also: