The pursuit and arrest of former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte on an International Criminal Court (ICC) warrant proves that the Hague-based court is 'evidence of selective justice' and a 'weapon of Western influence'.

Duane Dizon, a geopolitical and regional economy expert, has told RT:

"The ICC's actions were more about asserting clout than accountability. The ICC has consistently shown a pattern of targeting leaders from developing nations while giving powerful Western countries a free pass to control 'weaker' nations. This could drive a deeper wedge between Southeast Asia and the West."

On Sunday, Duterte told his supporters:

"If that's my fate, that's fine I will accept it. We can't do anything if I'm arrested or imprisoned."

According to Dizon, the former president's arrest proves that the court exists to "undermine independent leadership," prompting other nations to seek stronger ties with non-Western powers like China and Russia.

Established to prosecute grave crimes, the ICC has faced persistent criticism for its disproportionate focus on developing nations, particularly, on Africa, with many accusing it of neo-colonialism and selective justice, serving Western interests rather than impartial law.

The ICC's authority is also compromised by the absence of major powers such as the US, Russia, China and Israel from its jurisdiction.

The International Criminal Court (ICC) took advantage of a feud between two of the most powerful families in the Philippines to arrest the country's former President Rodrigo Duterte, Daniel Hugo Santos of the ASEAN Youth Organization has told RT.

The ICC opened an inquiry into anti-drug operations by the Philippine police in 2021 and issued an arrest warrant against Duterte in January, three years after his term in office expired.

According to Hugo Santos, the former president's rift with the current leader Bongbong Marcos "has caused the ICC to speed up the process."

The feud between Duterte and Marcos, representing the two most powerful political dynasties, was triggered by personal accusations and policy disagreements. Duterte accused Marcos of consolidating power and drug use, while Marcos dismissed these claims, referencing Duterte's use of the painkiller fentanyl. Duterte's daughter, Vice President Sara Duterte, publicly threatened President Marcos and his family, leading to the start of impeachment proceedings last month.

The ICC picks the "easiest targets" such as "developing countries in the Global South," exposing its own "double standards," Hugo Santos said.

• The EU's leaders are now a global threat
• Pepe Escobar: Europe suffering from acute dementia - declares war on Russia all over again
• Eastern European politicians discussing preemptive attack on Russia
• The agony of the "political West"
• EU 'rearmament' plan has no funding - Euractiv

How did they do it? I get much of my real news from Telegram channels. This is how one explained the plan:

1) The gas pressure pumps were stopped and the gas was sucked out

2) Oxygen was pumped into the pipeline

3) Diggers dug out rooms for assembly and toilets were installed

4) Water, food and ammunition was brought in to these assembly rooms

5) 800 soldiers went through the pipe to the assembly rooms

6) The soldiers waited 4 days in the assembly rooms and in the pipe close to the exit

7) When the signal was given, they ran out and went into the industry zone of Sudzha

8) The Ukrainian army was surprised to see such a huge force in their rear, they began to panic and became disorganized

9) Russians liberated many settlements in Kursk region, due to this

© Kalibrated maps on X.blue=Ukrainian control
orange=recaptured by Russia

yellow=current fighting
red=Russian incursions into Ukraine)

Geopolitical commenters Alexander Mercouris and Alex Chistoforou have much more details describing how it unfolded here.

My question to the diehard pro-war deadenders, is this: how exactly do you plan to prevail over a country whose soldiers would do THIS?

The White House dismissed concerns that the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) is instructing employees to destroy classified documents amid efforts by the Trump administration to shutter the agency.

USAID's acting Executive Secretary Erica Carr instructed employees to begin shredding and burning documents, according to a motion that government labor unions filed in a federal court Tuesday.

But the documents remain available on computer systems - and the order comes as U.S. Customs and Border Protection is poised to move into the USAID building, according to White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly.

"This was sent to roughly three dozen employees," Kelly said in a Tuesday night X post regarding Carr's order.

"The documents involved were old, mostly courtesy content (content from other agencies), and the originals still exist on classified computer systems. More fake news hysteria!"

Everyone involved in the process of eliminating the documents had a secret security clearance or higher, and were not among those placed on administrative leave, an administration official told Fox News Digital Wednesday.

As a result, those involved were familiar with the content they were handling and were specifically appointed by the agency to review and conduct the purge, the official said.