Puppet MastersS


Cruise Missle

Close the US military bases in Asia!

US Military Bases (Japan and South Korea)


(2 May 2025) President Donald Trump is again loudly complaining that the US military bases in Asia are too costly for the US to bear. As part of the new round of tariff negotiations with Japan and Korea,1 Trump is calling on Japan and Korea to pay for stationing the US troops. Here's a much better idea: close the bases and return the US servicemen to the US.


Donald Trump implies that the US is providing a great service to Japan and Korea by stationing 50,000 troops in Japan and nearly 30,000 in Korea. Yet these countries do not need the US to defend themselves. They are wealthy and can certainly provide their own defense. Far more importantly, diplomacy can ensure the peace in northeast Asia far more effectively and far less expensively than US troops.

The US acts as if Japan needs to be defended against China. Let's have a look. During the past 1,000 years, during which time China was the region's dominant power for all but the last 150 years, how many times did China attempt to invade Japan? If you answered zero, you are correct. China did not attempt to invade Japan on a single occasion.

You might quibble. What about the two attempts in 1274 and 1281, roughly 750 years ago? It's true that when the Mongols temporarily ruled China between 1271 and 1368, the Mongols twice sent expeditionary fleets to invade Japan, and both times were defeated by a combination of typhoons (known in Japanese lore as the Kamikaze winds) and by Japanese coastal defenses.

Japan, on the other hand, made several attempts to attack or conquer China. In 1592, the arrogant and erratic Japanese military leader Toyotomi Hideyoshi launched an invasion of Korea with the goal of conquering Ming China. He did not get far, dying in 1598 without even having subdued Korea. In 1894-1895, Japan invaded and defeated China in the Sino-Japanese war, taking Taiwan as a Japanese colony. In 1931, Japan invaded northeast China (Manchuria) and created the Japanese colony of Manchukuo. In 1937, Japan invaded China, starting World War II in the Pacific region.

Nobody thinks that Japan is going to invade China today, and there is no rhyme, reason, or historical precedent to believe that China is going to invade Japan. Japan has no need for the US military bases to protect itself from China.

Yoda

The stakes of Donald Trump's negotiations with Ukraine

DOnald Zel
© unknownDonald Trump receives the confession of Volodymyr Zelensky • April 26, 2025 • St. Peter's Basilica • Rome
President Donald Trump has failed to bring peace to Ukraine as he believed he could. He has discovered a situation far more complex than he expected. Refusing to take sides, he has found himself plunged into a century-old conflict between two sworn enemies; a conflict that his predecessors, Barack Obama and Joe Biden, fueled and instrumentalized. He must therefore enlighten his fellow citizens before he can resolve the situation.

After examining President Donald Trump's negotiations with Iran [1], we now examine his negotiations with Ukraine. Unfortunately, we do not have the documents of the Ukrainian "integral nationalists" like we do of the Israeli "revisionist Zionists." This is because today's Ukraine is truly a military dictatorship, while in Israel, the army is still the guarantor of what remains of democracy in the face of Benjamin Netanyahu's "revisionist Zionists."

The Ukrainian issue is very different from the Iranian issue in that the United States does not share the same myths with that country as it does with Israel. In the Middle East, President Donald Trump is attempting to negotiate a just and lasting peace while preserving Israel's interests (and not those of the "revisionist Zionists" who favor a Greater Israel).

In Ukraine, he refuses to take sides and maintains a position of strict neutrality, while his predecessors, Barack Obama and Joe Biden, had concluded a secret agreement with the "integral nationalists" against Russia. Here too, he must uncover the truth, but this time, he must make his own administration aware of it before he can conclude anything.

Comment: Unpredictable Trump has method to his madness. Predictable Zelensky just the madness.


Bandaid

US gave Ukraine just 'enough arms to bleed' - ex-CIA chief

tank smoke
© Anadolu/Getty ImagesUkrainian tank in Russia's Donetsk Region • April 28, 2025
Ralph Goff says Washington feared nuclear retaliation and deliberately prolonged the conflict.

The United States deliberately restricted military aid to Kiev in order to let the country "bleed" rather than "win," a former senior CIA official has claimed, describing the strategy pursued by then-US President Joe Biden during the early stages of the conflict.

Ukraine has repeatedly requested advanced American weapons systems that were initially withheld or delayed by Washington.

In an interview with The Times published on Friday, Ralph Goff - former head of the CIA's operations in Europe and Eurasia - said Biden was reluctant to send the necessary equipment due to fears that Russia "will go nuclear." He argued that the decision to hold back key weapons turned the conflict into a prolonged and devastating war.
"Had we equipped the Ukrainians at that time with proper weaponry, they might have been able to drive the Russians all the way out of the country. It didn't happen. It set the stage for this longer, protracted, drawn out, meat grinder war that we are witnessing today."

Comment: Seems to be a lot of second-guessing regarding Russia - one of the more straight forward/plain talking and consistently sane countries on the planet.


Attention

Collapsing Empire: AnsarAllah defeats US again

USS Harry S. Truman
© Global DelinquentsAn F-18 prepares for launch on the USS Harry S. Truman, April 1st 2025.
On May 6th, Donald Trump made the shock announcement that the US was abandoning all hostilities against Yemen. A vast, multi-billion naval and air campaign officials in Washington had pledged would last "indefinitely" has abruptly ended, in return for AnsarAllah pledging not to attack American shipping in the Red Sea. While the President has bragged the Resistance group "capitulated" to his administration's renewed, much-intensified belligerence and "don't want to fight any more", the reality is that God's Partisans have once again defeated the Empire.

As reported by the New York Times, it remains unclear whether the ceasefire will apply to other foreign shipping, "after a costly seven-week bombing campaign." Meanwhile, AnsarAllah has "stopped short of declaring a full cease-fire, saying that they would continue to fight Israel," while [portraying] the deal as a major victory for the militia and a failure for Mr. Trump, spreading a social media hashtag that read 'Yemen defeats America'." In other words, the Resistance campaign against the Zionist entity will endure, and could intensify.

Reinforcing the Empire's trouncing, such was Washington's desperation to extricate herself from the self-initiated conflict, Israeli officials apparently weren't apprised of the deal, only learning the US was withdrawing from the Red Sea from TV news reports. Yet, the mainstream media has over recent weeks clearly been laying the foundations of the Empire's surrender to AnsarAllah, for the second time in less than a year. A number of prominent Western news reports have been uncharacteristically critical of US performance in battling God's Partisans anew.

Eye 2

'Prince Andrew Was F*ing Underage Girls' Says Royal Insider In Undercover Footage

prince andrew
An American businessman close to the royal family (not for long) was caught on undercover footage with damning claims about Prince Andrew's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

John Bryan, a trusted advisor to the Duke of York, claims that Prince Andrew lied to him about his involvement with minors, according to the footage, obtained by O'Keefe Media Group (OMG).

"I knew he [Prince Andrew] saw him [Jeffrey Epstein]," said Bryan, "But he lied to me that he was such a close friend," revealed Bryan, referring to Prince Andrew's personal relationship with Epstein.

Brain

Sen. John Fetterman fumes over New York magazine's 'one-source hit piece' making claims about his 'erratic' behavior

Sen. John Fetterman mental health reports erratic
© ReutersSen. John Fetterman ripped the exposé on him as a “hit piece” from a “very left publication.”
Democratic Sen. John Fetterman ripped a New York magazine report that quoted current and former staffers questioning his mental health as a "one-source hit piece" by a "very left publication."

"A one-source hit piece, some anonymous sources. So there's nothing new," Fetterman (D-Pa.) told reporters Tuesday about the exposé, which rocked the beltway late last week with its description of aides calling the senator "erratic" — as well as the rocky relationship with his wife, Gisele.

When asked about the idea that those who spoke to the magazine were worried about his health, Fetterman shot back: "They are actually not concerned, it's a hit piece."

Comment: Newsweek provides more details:
A tense meeting last week between Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman and a delegation from a teachers' union ended with one of his staffers in tears according to The Associated Press news agency, escalating growing concerns over the Democratic lawmaker's mental health and behavior just three years after suffering a life-threatening stroke.

Newsweek has reached out to John Fetterman's office for comment via email on Thursday outside of regular office hours.

Why It Matters

This episode comes amid broader scrutiny of the Pennsylvania Democrat's mental and emotional health, including recent public allegations from his former chief of staff Adam Jentleson, who described the senator's conduct in a 2024 letter to a Walter Reed neuropsychiatrist as "on a bad trajectory."
[...]
Last week's meeting took place in Fetterman's Washington, D.C., office during what was supposed to be a routine discussion with education representatives according to the AP. Instead, the news agency reported Fetterman's demeanor quickly unraveled, citing individuals briefed on the meeting.

The senator reportedly began shouting, repeating himself, and slammed his hands on a desk while asking: "Why does everyone hate me, what did I ever do?"

One staff member ultimately cut the meeting short and escorted the union visitors out, then broke down crying in the hallway. The union representatives reportedly comforted the staffer.

When asked about the meeting, Fetterman issued a statement through his office to the AP, describing it as "a spirited conversation about our collective frustration with the Trump administration's cuts to our education system."

He added: "I will always support our teachers, and I will always reject anyone's attempt to turn Pennsylvania's public schools into a voucher program."

The events described by the AP came just one day before New York Magazine's Intelligencer published a detailed account of staff concerns about Fetterman's mental health. In the story, Jentleson warned in a letter that the senator had stopped attending medical appointments, pushed away those responsible for helping manage his health, and might have discontinued prescribed medications. He also alleged reckless behavior, including texting and video-calling while driving at high speeds.

"He has picked fights with each person involved in that system and used those fights as excuses to push them out and cut them off from any knowledge about his health situation," Jentleson wrote, according to the letter.

New York Magazine also reported that Fetterman's wife, Gisele, had refused to speak with him until he underwent required blood work, which he eventually did, but only after missing earlier appointments. Other aides described episodes of seclusion, mood swings, and erratic social media behavior, despite staff efforts to manage his online presence.
as does the Daily Mail:
One year after Fetterman's release from the traumatic-brain-injury and neuropsychiatry unit at Walter Reed Hospital, Jentleson wrote a letter the division's director who treated Fetterman there.

'I think John is on a bad trajectory and I'm really worried about him,' Jentleson wrote in the 1,600-word email with the subject line: 'Concerns.'

He added that the senator 'won't be with us for much longer' if he doesn't change his behavior, with Jentleson claiming these are 'the things you said to flag, so I am flagging.'

One of the things he was told to flag: that Fetterman purchased a gun, though Jentleson admits the senator 'takes all the necessary precautions, and living where he does I understand the desire for personal protection.'

Jentleson is referring to the hard-scrabble small town of Braddock where Fetterman served as mayor and still lives.

Fetterman is accused of everything from the physical - 'not taking his meds' to eating fast food multiple times a day - to the mental - lying, 'self-centered monologues,' 'conspiratorial thinking; megalomania' - among his issues.

The senator is also allegedly obsessed with social media despite admitting it was an 'accelerant' of his depression and driving 'recklessly' to the point that staffers refused to ride with him and a police officer said it was 'a miracle no one died' after one accident last June.

Jentleson also argued that 'every person who was supposed to help him stay on his recovery plan has been pushed out.'

The former chief of staff later said in an interview a year after writing the letter that he's telling his side of the story because he believes Fetterman's trajectory has taken him out of consideration to lead the Democrats going forward.

'Part of the tragedy here is that this is a man who could be leading Democrats out of the wilderness but I also think he's struggling in a way that shouldn't be hidden from the public.'

Quite the opposite, as The Intercept recently reported that Fetterman's campaign is bleeding money and losing small-dollar donors ever since his meeting with Trump.

The author, Ben Terris, spoke to Fetterman ahead of publication and got a text message from him asking: 'Why is this a story?

He added that the number of staffers leaving is typical for Washington and he is the 'best version' of himself right now.

Fetterman also denied claims that towards the beginning of his first term, he had to be spoken with for 'an hour' with staffers 'trying to trying to convince him, to talk him out of some crazy fantasy' that he wouldn't be allowed in the Senate.

He also said there is no truth to accusations that he began to 'sour' on his own party after bipartisan efforts to prevent him from wearing his trademark hoodie and shorts to the Senate floor.

Things became somewhat more complicated when asked about arguments over Gaza and meeting with Donald Trump with his wife Gisele, herself having come to the U.S. as an illegal migrant.

Fetterman called their disagreements 'very common in political marriage' and said Gisele 'has her own voice.

Gisele, for her part, told New York Magazine that Jentleson is trying to harm her husband and lied to her about his health.

'I would talk to John's doctors about what Adam was telling me and they would be confused. Those doctors would tell me that their concerns were not with John, but with Adam,' she said.

Things got more tense when Terris asked whether Fetterman wanted to comment on what was supposedly coming out of his camp.

The politician - who beat out Republican Mehmet Oz back in 2022 - responded with a resounding 'no.' He went on to eye two of his staffers, Terris said - recalling how Fetterman then adjourned for an abrupt break.

First, though, he offered the reporter some stern words.

He claimed that no one in his staff would know about his personal health situation and that anyone claiming otherwise was merely misinformed.

'There's not really anything to respond when that's just not accurate,' he said, shortly after fielding a question about Trump's mental faculties.

Terris, however, pressed on - saying that these former staffers told him 'they've witnessed ups and downs that could be associated with kind of a relapse.

'They also worry that the medication that you're on is not just for depression, but more serious drugs that if you're not on them would be a problem,' Terris added.

'Is there truth to that?'

At this point, Fetterman - who suffered a stroke whilst running against Oz - declared he had nothing to comment, before bringing the conversation off the record for the next few minutes.

Jentleson adds that the shocking stroke Fetterman suffered doesn't mean the senator has to be this way permanently.

'He's not locked into a downward trajectory; he could get back in treatment at any time, and for a long time I held out hope that he would. But it's just been too long now, and things keep getting worse.'

Terris was reportedly left out in a hallway with a few of Fetterman's aides after initially questioning him but was eventually let back in.

Fetterman sat in the same chair but was now 'slumped into himself,' he noticed - comparing the senator who checked himself into Walter Reed in 2023 to receive treatment for depression to 'a deflated parade float.'

'He avoided looking at me,' Terris further claimed, before breaking the silence.

'Anything to say about that?' he asked, referring to his earlier inquiry.

'There's not anyone that you're referencing who would be privy to my medical history,' Fetterman insisted again, before being asked whether he cared to comment on whether the unnamed staffers were right or wrong.

Fetterman - whose politics were once more aligned with those of Bernie Sanders before an apparent shift right in recent months - framed the insight as rumors from 'disgruntled' former staffers.

When asked why these employees may have been disgruntled, Fetterman shot back, 'For whatever reason.'

'There's a lot of people who just hide behind unnamed sources in articles,' he added.

The exchange ended there, with the interview ending minutes later.

'I feel like there's been kind of a tone shift here,' Terris told Fetterman as the interview waned, attempting to catch the senator's eye.

'Can you tell me what you're feeling? What you're thinking?'

The question spurred the senator to finally look at him, Terris recalled - before remembering Fetterman's response.

'No, everything's great,' he said, reportedly with little emotion. 'Everything's great. I don't know what you're referencing.'

DailyMail.com has reached out to Fetterman for comment.



Skull

The death of Old Europe: The living corpses in Brussels have forgotten how to fight for their world

european union eu torn flag
© Getty Images/mikie11
Between uncontrolled migration, propagandistic ideology and self-suffocating green agenda, the EU has only itself to blame for its decline

The European Union, that grand and failing dream of technocrats, is dying. Its decline is not sudden or dramatic but a slow unraveling, a bureaucratic collapse in which every policy designed to sustain it only hastens its demise.

It starves itself on the thin gruel of ideology - open borders dissolving nations into contested spaces, green mandates suffocating industry under the weight of unattainable standards, and a moralizing anti-Russian fervor that has left it isolated and energy-dependent. Once, Europe was the center of empires, the birthplace of civilizations that shaped the world. Now, it is a patient refusing medicine, convinced that its sickness is a form of enlightenment, that its weakness is a new kind of strength. The architects of this experiment still speak in the language of unity, but the cracks in the foundation are too deep to ignore.

Russian Flag

Russia must crush resurgent Nazism in West - security chief

The Secretary of the Russian Security Council Sergey Shoigu
© Getty Images / Kristina KormilitsynaThe Secretary of the Russian Security Council Sergey Shoigu
The EU and NATO are promoting Russophobia in the style of Goebbels' propaganda, Sergey Shoigu has said.

Moscow must crush Nazism, which has resurfaced in the West in recent years, Russian Security Council Secretary Sergey Shoigu has said.

On Tuesday, ahead of the 80th anniversary of victory in the Great Patriotic War - Russia's term for the 1941-1945 Soviet war against Nazi Germany - Shoigu emphasized the "enormous price" paid by the USSR in defeating Nazi Germany.

"The multinational people of Russia have learned well the lessons of the Great Patriotic War against fascism," Shoigu wrote in Rossiyskaya Gazeta. The secretary served as defense minister from 2012 to 2024. He mentioned nearly 27 million combat deaths and 6.5 million additional deaths from starvation and disease during the war against the Nazis.

Arrow Up

Romania's revolt against liberal globalism

Orthodoxy and sovereignty strike back.

George Simion
© Arktos Journal
Alexander Dugin sees George Simion's first-round win in Romania's presidential election as another spark in Europe's conservative surge and a sign of the nation's Orthodox revival.

The victory of the sovereigntist candidate George Simion in the first round of Romania's presidential election is a momentous event. It confirms the Romanian people's will to end the dominance of the liberal Euro-elites and the globalist dictatorship. It is also essential to remember that the Romanian people are an Orthodox people. When George Simion and the previously disqualified candidate Călin Georgescu speak of a return to traditional values, they mean a return to Orthodoxy. This is of great significance.

A wave of conservative revolution is now rising across Europe. Supporters of traditional values are challenging the globalists. We saw an earlier act of this drama in America, in the struggle of the Trumpists against the globalists, which resulted in the victory of traditional values in the last U.S. election. Of course, American traditional values differ from both ours and Europe's, but they remain traditional values nonetheless.

This conservative revolution has now spread to Europe, where it meets fierce resistance from radical liberals who have effectively established dictatorships in most European countries. Just recently, they designated the conservative sovereigntist party Alternative for Germany (AfD) as an "extremist organization" — without any legitimate basis. In doing so, they openly defied the new U.S. administration, as both Trump and Elon Musk have expressed support for the AfD.

Question

Was the Kashmir attack an Israeli false flag?

Netanyahu Modi israel india
© Avi Ohayon/GPOPrime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (left) and his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi at a joint press conference in the president's house in New Delhi, India, on January 15, 2018. (
Are India and Israel concocting the perfect war?

There are rumors of war between Pakistan and India. The casus belli is the terrorist attack in Pahalgam on April 22, 2025.

The attack was on tourists near Pahalgam in the Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir region. Five armed militants attacked visitors in the Baisaran Valley, killing 26 civilians (mostly Hindu men) and injuring 20 others. The attackers used AK-47s and M4 carbines and reportedly singled out victims based on religion, asking some to recite the Islamic creed, and shot them when they could not do so. Among the victims was a local Muslim pony operator who tried to intervene and was killed. All the attackers escaped, and have not been caught.

A vague and little-known group, the Resistance Front (TRF), which some say is an offshoot of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), initially claimed responsibility but later retracted the claim. Indian authorities identified three of the attackers: two Pakistani nationals and one local from Kashmir, all linked to LeT. Investigations revealed that one Pakistani militant had previously served in Pakistan's paramilitary forces before joining LeT. The Indian government offered a bounty for information leading to the capture or killing of the suspects.

Comment: A compelling analysis. Over the years, India has been very aggressive with respect to Jammu and Kashmir.