
© Twitter/GulfToday/Getty Images/KJNIsraeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu • US President Donald Trump • Emirati President Sheikh Mohamed Bin Zayed Al Nahyan
What is interesting about Trump's Middle East visit is that it doesn't include an Israel stop. The
FT opinion piece gives us a clue as to why.
The recent opinion piece from the Financial Times which, in a nutshell, argues
that the West should be ashamed by its silence on Gaza is poignant in many ways. Not least for the fact that its author is a British Lebanese editor-in-chief, nor for that matter that
it chooses not to point the finger directly at Brussels (there is no greater English language media outlet which is a bigger supporter of the project)
but more for its timing. Certainly, the pathetic platitudes like this have come very late and now offer no real substance to helping the Palestinians with their immediate needs - to eat and to stop Israeli wiping them out. But they could arguably be seen as
a signal to the western world at precisely the moment Trump arrives in the Middle East to do his dancing with the Saudis and their swords. It took an 'Arab' of sorts to see the moment.
Trump will meet Saudi Arabia's polemic Crown Prince 'MbS' in mid-May and then fly onto Qatar to meet the Emir of Qatar Sheikh Tamim al-Thani. On May 15, he'll visit Abu Dhabi and meet Emirati President Mohammed Bin Zayed (MBZ).In other words, he starts with those who believe they are running the Middle East, then goes to those who have the cash to do it, but aren't sure about how to go about it and ends with the leading Arab figure who most analysts agree
really is in charge of the whole shooting match.
Comment: In this article, Ex-Pentagon analyst: Zelensky will reject Putin's peace proposal in order to stay alive, there was: The level of radicalness among some of the leaders of Western Europe and their backers is in several respects comparable to what has previously been noted among transnational Salafi jihadists (think ISIS).
"Almost 250 years" raises the question whether the periods of peace inbetween were any more than interludes before more war?
Although it has happened before in the history of the world, including the more recent history of Ukraine, that more peace negotiations preceded more upheaval, peace should still be given a chance. Efforts made to achieve it are not wasted, but how this squares with the consideration that many peace efforts in Europe were like interludes raises the question of the human condition on this planet and the forces that influence it. Since these for the most part remain poorly understood, what kind of peace can we really expect?