Suddenly perfectly ordinary foods are set to give you cancer, why? And who stands to gain?
© Off-Guardian
We've been covering the emerging food crisis for months now. Detailing how the economy was
deliberately sabotaged to drive up the cost of living, especially food, via lockdowns and sanctions.But propaganda wars are like regular wars: They have theatres, fronts and overt for covert campaigns.
Yes, the big noise on food is that we need to change to "save the planet", but there's more going on in smaller spheres. A constant drip-feed of stories, articles and studies designed to undermine public faith in the food we eat.
Here are four examples, all from just the last ten days.
1. BEEF CAUSES CANCEROn June 3rd
MedicalXpress reported on a new study which - allegedly - (we'll be using that word a lot) found red meat increased cancer risk in certain people.
The "study", carried out at the Boston University School of Medicine and originally published in the Journal of Nutrition, claims to have found that "unprocessed" red meat increased the risk of colorectal cancer {CRC} - in black women:
Unprocessed red meat intake was associated with an increased CRC risk in the present study, the first positive evidence that red meat plays a role in the etiology of CRC in Black women.
2. SO DOES FISHThen, on June 9th, Sky News reported another study which found
eating fish on a regular basis also increases your risk - this time of skin cancer.
This "study", done out of Brown University and published in the
journal Cancers Causes and Control, alleges those who eat over 40g of fish per day had a 22% increased risk of skin cancer:
We found that higher total fish intake, tuna intake, and non-fried fish intake were positively associated with risk of both malignant melanoma and melanoma in situ. Future studies are needed to investigate the potential biological mechanisms underlying these associations.
Comment: Delusions never amount to their promise - especially in a war against a superior 'enemy'.