
© ReutersA nurse performs a PCR test at the Hospital de la Tour during the COVID-19 outbreak in Meyrin near Geneva, Switzerland
A publisher admitted it is urgently re-investigating research, following revelations that the PCR test it extols is defective, giving too many false-positives. The news comes as a new group plans a legal challenge over the checks.
Last week
I reported on an astonishing
review conducted by a group of senior scientists on a paper on which most Covid testing is based. It comprehensively debunked the science behind the Corman-Drosten paper, which described a protocol for using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique to detect Covid, finding 10 fatal flaws, including
major failings in the operating procedure and potential conflicts of interest among its authors.
The team behind the review demanded that
Eurosurveillance, the journal that published the
original research, retract it at once, as in their view it clearly failed to meet proper standards. This is of vital importance because the Corman-Drosten paper
laid the path for mass PCR testing as the main source of data on the coronavirus. Almost all case numbers, infection rates and even deaths attributed to Covid are based on PCR tests (and all the attendant lockdowns and restrictions on people), and a huge amount of them use the method set out in the Corman-Drosten paper.
But now, the organisation Retraction Watch have
reported that
Eurosurveillance is considering retracting the paper. In a
statement,
Eurosurveillance said that they were "seeking further expert advice and discussing the current correspondence in detail. We will, according to our existing procedures, evaluate the claims and make a decision as soon as we have investigated in full.'' So no retraction yet, but it would not be surprising if one came soon.
Comment: Why are so many asteroids having close calls with Earth in 2020?