© pamela_d_mcadams – stock.adobe.comA depiction of the Ark of the Covenant that differs from what is described by the CIA’s remote viewer #32.
The CIA claimed to have confirmed the existence of the Ark of the Covenant by way of remote viewing — aka extra sensory perception or ESP — alleging the mysterious and sacred object is guarded by "entities" with an "unknown" power, a recently resurfaced declassified document claims.
In a remote viewing session on Dec. 5, 1988, remote viewer #32 was tasked with identifying a target that, unbeknownst to them, ended up being the storied Ark of the Covenant, according to document, which was declassified on Aug. 8, 2000, and has been circulating on social media.
Logistically, when a remote viewer is tasked with searching for a target, the desired object is written down on a piece of paper and put into an envelope. The remote viewer does not know what is written and is guided through the process by another person, retired US Army Chief Warrant Joe McMoneagle explained.
"Information collected under this protocol is the only information that can be identified as remote viewing," McMoneagle said.
McMoneagle, aka remote viewer #1, was the first to do the psychic phenomena experiments for the CIA — and he is not convinced by the exercise memorialized in the declassified document.
Remote viewer #32's vision described a secret Middle Eastern location of the object — which they don't know is the Ark — but they say is "protected by entities," the document reveals.
"Target is a container. This container has another container inside of it. The target is fashioned of wood, gold and silver... similar in shape to a coffin and is decorated with seraphim," they relayed, per the file.
© CIAThe first page of the declassified CIA document.
"The target is hidden — underground, dark and wet were all aspects of the location of the target," they continued.
"The purpose of the target is to bring a people together. It has something to do with ceremony, memory, homage, the resurrection. There is an aspect of spirituality, information, lessons and the historical knowledge far beyond what we now know."
Remote viewer #32 then expounded on the more mysterious aspects of what they saw.
"The target is protected by entities and can only be opened by those who are authorized to do so — this container will not/cannot be opened until the time is deemed correct. Once it is time to open the container — the mechanics of the lock system will be found to be fairly simple," they said before adding a warning to potential plunderers.
"Individuals opening the container by prying or striking are destroyed by the container's protectors through the use of a power unknown to us."
The channeler also described what they took to be a devotional aspect of the object.
"The purpose of the target is to bring people together. It has something to do with ceremony, memory, homage, the resurrection. There is an aspect of spirituality, information, lessons and historical knowledge far beyond what we now know," they said.
The declassified document also included several pages of drawings that depict one of the four seraphim that stand out on the corners of the Ark, as well as a drawing of mummies lined up on a wall.
© CIARemote viewer #32’s description of what they saw while targeting the anonymous object.
"Using remote viewing against any target for which ground truth does not exist or is impossible to obtain, such as UFOs, UAPs, the surface of Mars, or the locations of historical relics, is a waste of time and resources," McGoneagle told The Post.
"If someone claims that remote viewing proves the existence of something, such as the Ark of the Covenant, they must produce the Ark to substantiate their claim."
The world's foremost expert on the matter gave further context for the exercise recorded by the CIA in 1988.
"In this case, it is a training target done on a whim," he said, adding, "I would challenge the entire practice session as bogus. No one attempted to ascertain the ground truth of the material, and everything said was accepted on its unknown and unverified merit."
McMoneagle famously received the Legion of Merit for using remote viewing to identify a secret Russian warship that was being developed in a landlocked building during the Cold War.
"Currently, the Ark of the Covenant is a legendary tale. If they can produce the actual Ark based on the information, it will be a surprise to me, as well as to many others," McMongeale stated to The Post.
The Ark of the Covenant is said to have held the Ten Commandments brought down by Moses from Mount Sinai.
Reader Comments
If you watch the Legacy series on GaiaTV with Uri Geller, the spoon bender, was one of the original remote viewers the CIA studied. In more recent years Uri is paid millions to find oil under the ground. What does it mean? Reality, physics, time, consciousness are not what we think.
The Indiana Jones franchise began in 1981 with Indiana Jones and the Ark of the Covenant. It portrays the NAZIs as seeking the power of such artefacts, which is actually something the NAZIs did pursue. The ending of the movie is the Ark being opened and the "entities" released killed the NAZIs. Did the CIA do other remote viewing before this 1988 document?
It's like learning a different language. If you visit Europe many people can speak multiple languages. That ability comes from the European languages being Indo-European languages and have a lot of Greek and Latin roots. However, if you go to Asia (Chinese, Vietnamese) the languages are tonal and don't have the same roots. Thus, learning such languages are rather more difficult.
Learning the language of the subconscious is even more difficult as it is expressed in images that fleet across your mind.
End of the movie showed the 'ark' being rolled into a Smithsonian archive where it will presumably be lost for another thousand years.
We are flooded with news of things like this, and UFO's and all manner of strange, irrelevant crap, all the while relevant medical, environmental and political science is buried or vilified.
Humanity needs a Great Reset of our priorities.
After doing the RV, the initial tasker revels the target. In my case I get to see the pictures that I was RVing.
In one case there were two pictures, the first was the eruption of a volcano on an island and the second was the island after the eruption and the vegetation regrowth. My first attempt at that target I was getting a red/brown image, my imagination turned it into a darkened study with a fireplace. I knew/suspected that wasn't right and stopped the RV session. I started up fresh two days later and I got an outdoor scene, a treeline (not pine) after a meadow with water in it. I sensed that something significant had happened in that area. - I was sensing each photo separately.
Like I said, it is a learning process and I have a long way to go.
Here is a link to the FFG site. You may be able to check out some videos and the like. [Link]
Perhaps the guys at Future Forecasters Group may have already done a RV of the Arc or something similar. Check out their webpage and see what they have. If one of their sessions interests you, you can pay a small fee to view the entire session.
And second, how should I understand "confirmed" ? How can the remote viewers e.g. distinguish the "real thing" from a fake ? Those fakes are much more prevalent than science and archeology casually admit. After all, they still present Schliemann as archeology role model, a man who got caught red-handed in the act ...
And what if the fake 'ark' was made centuries ago in a way to match the description in a heavily forged book - and 99.9% of believers believe it's the real thing ? Would that still be "confirmation of the Ark's location" ?
So many questions ...
If this so called ancient artifact exists, where is it other than some mythic ideology, presented in biblical texts that it has to be, for the sake of humanity, sequestered with so much knowledge that it is so dangerous to mankind to even touch it, will result in instant death...
Now that is freaky, and this myth has lasted for generations,
[Link]
[Link]
Thanks for your link.
I think we still do that, but in a more sanitized, and maybe sinister way. We tie them to a vice and let them burn themselves up.
Best location and description I ever came across for the ark.
Pay not attention to the beats ...