Mostly, they miss the vitally important point.
The same was true when Neil Ferguson - main author of the Imperial Model, and consequently the lockdown - was found to be breaking lockdown with his married girlfriend.
The press divided between the lockdown enthusiasts defending him, or the anti-lockdowners eagerly calling him a hypocrite.
Both, again, were missing the point.
Yes, it's satisfying to cast people down for being hypocrites. Yes, it's easy to conduct witchhunts based on shallow issues against people whose politics we disagree with. But to take part in the free-for-all is to endorse a distraction that actually reinforces the narrative, and misses the fundamentally more important issue at the root of it.
We're all meant to be "sheltering in place" and "protecting the NHS" and "saving lives" because there is a "deadly virus". We're being told this is for our own safety. Because the virus is allegedly dangerous.
When the people giving us these orders do not follow them themselves, they are not showing themselves to be "hypocrites". They are showing themselves to be liars. They are admitting they don't really believe what they're saying.
The best example is actually from the other side of the pond - Chris Cuomo, CNN anchor, brother of one New York governor and son of another.
When Cuomo was meant to be "self-isolating", after allegedly getting infected, he was spotted by a cyclist socialising on the site where his new house is being built. (Days later, Cuomo made a big deal out of emerging from his basement as if he hadn't seen his family in two weeks).
You don't invite your married girlfriend round to your house, then send her back to her husband and children, if you really believe there's a dangerous virus.
You don't drive to Durham in the middle of a "national emergency" if you really believe we could all get infected and die.
You don't break your self-isolation early to have a barbecue with your neighbours if you truly think you have a terrible disease that could make your family sick.
If I tell you you shouldn't eat chocolate, because it will make your head explode, then I take your chocolate off you and eat it - you wouldn't think "You hypocrite! You fool! That could make your head explode!", would you?
You'd be far more likely to think "Hey, he lied to me so he could steal my chocolate."
(To fully complete the metaphor there needs to be a third person there, saying "but chocolate never made our heads explode before", and being roundly insulted by the other two as a "Chocolate Denier", who "just wants people's heads to explode!")
Whether it's Neil Ferguson or Dom Cummings or Chris Cuomo the message is the same. They are telling us they do not really believe there is any danger.
More than that, the press covering it obviously don't really believe it either.
Look at the crush of reporters and cameramen swarm over Dom Cummings outside his home this morning:
Remember: Cummings alleged crime is "breaking social distancing rules".
Are any of those people social distancing? Are they all wearing masks? Are they acting - in any way whatsoever - as if there is a genuinely "deadly virus" out there?
No, they're not. Because they don't really believe it.
The same is true of the police, who will happily man-handle someone for not wearing a mask, despite not wearing masks themselves:
Or, without any sense of irony, mob protesters for not "social distancing":
Whether this is true Orwellian double-think or just old-fashioned dishonesty is not for us to judge (that's between them, their consciences and maybe their therapists). The internal complexities are as unknowable as they are irrelevant.
The point is: The police, the press, the scientists, the politicians - everyone spouting the need to follow the lockdown rules is perfectly happy to break them.
Because they know what they're really for, and it's not to protect us from a virus.
Reader Comments
What they really mean is once they have produced 100 million shots, they are not going to let it go to waste whether it works or not
95% of people wouldn't know the difference between an working vaccine or a placebo as they are asymptomatic anyway
"Two households will be able to meet up in the garden under new Government plans."
Read: Johnson is not able to sh*t or get off the pot.
One or the other way ...
The sad thing is, nothing will be done about any of it. People will just move on to the next crisis. The climate change agenda is already resurfacing as Covid dies off.
It's almost as if they like living in fear, when 99 percent of the things you fear never actually happen. Humans are such a weird species!
Whether it is Israel thinking it can annexe it's neighbours lands, or Julian Assange protests bringing London to a stop, whether Mr T gets reelected or Modi gets to have his war, the real folly is in thinking that people in general would aquiese to being locked down while their representatives abuse their goodwill and trust of the electorate.
Any move to war, long term lockdown, any further restrictions should be resisted , that is if you believe in accountable government and the democracy , that is claimed so dear in which ever Nation it is ,to which you belong.
It's not about power it's about Trust.
I hope that it's a cop actively 'leaking' (bleeding) there - and I guess it's one of the cops. You can see the blood drops hitting the floor. ~ 1.20.
Comment: There seems to be a divide in the way the UK MSM is reporting this saga, some are branding this a partisan issue and a witch hunt, while others are calling out the elitism and hypocrisy.
However, they all ignore fundamental questions: Why are the PTB repeatedly breaking their own rules? Is it because there is no killer virus out there? Furthermore, if the lockdowns are not to protect us or the NHS, what are they for? Is it to gain more control and further their own agendas?
If more people would dare to ask these difficult questions, the public may be able to lead us out of the lockdown!