During the Democrat primary debate in Houston, struggling 2020 candidate Beto O'Rourke vowed to seize every Americans' AR-15 guns.
Beto O'Rourke vowed to confiscate legally owned rifles during the third Democratic primary debate on Thursday evening.The store is called Alpha Dog Firearms, and you can visit their website here. These are the "Beto Specials" they're offering on AR-15's.
the recent mass shootings in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio, the former Democratic congressman said the federal government must seize certain semi-automatic rifles to prevent further tragedy.
"The high-impact, high velocity round, when it hits your body shreds everything insider your body because it was designed to do that, so that you would bleed to death on the battlefield," O'Rourke said to raucous applause.
"When we see that being used against children, and in Odessa, I met the mother of a 15-year-old girl who was shot by an AR-15 and that mother watched her bleed to death over the course of an hour because so many other people were shot by that AR-15 in Odessa, there weren't enough ambulances to get to them in time," he added. "Hell, yes, we're going to take your AR-15, your AK-47. We're not going to allow it to be used against a fellow American anymore." [National Review]
The demand for the "Beto specials" are so popular, that they're selling out, according to a post on the companies Facebook page.
The American Tactical Import Omni Hybrid Maxx Semi-automatic rifle for $349.99 was wildly popular and sold out quickly.
Alpha Dog's post about the "Beto Special" has gone viral on Facebook.
Thanks to Beto, more Americans are purchasing AR-15's. That's capitalism and patriotism at it's very best!
Reader Comments
I thought about it. That's a damn cheap price.
R.C.
Good job!
R.C.
Since cars (a tool) kill more people than guns (in America - AND if you do not count Cops' guns); then we out to outlaw cars.
Likewise, we should reduce speed limits down to 15 no, make it 10 mph. The rate of car crash casualties will go through the floor. However, at some point the bad economy suicides would supersede the car deaths.
Let's not make the 'tool' responsible;; but you know that.
R.C.
If you believe guns have no place in society, does that include the guns of the police, military, and all the other branches of state sponsored violence?
Either way, This is America jack! I’m glad you feel your country is 100% safe, but your virtue signaling falls on deaf ears when it comes to people who are really about this life of freedom and liberty.
In case you didn't know, fully automatic firearms were legal back then, and likewise were around. Think of Thompson Submachine Guns or the venerable BAR, both were used in WWI! In a close quarters slaughterhous, I would expect the Thomspon to kill more folks because closer than point blank, most Rifle Rounds go through without tumbling because they're still moving too fast.
Here, by far and away, most killings with guns (forgetting about suicides as it's easy enough to jump off a high bridge, etc.) are by cops, but the government hides the statistics by not giving subtotals of gun deaths by suicide, vs. shooter legitimate defense vs. assault/violent crime and what % of which category involves cops.* (Thus some private groups have had to start monitoring such.)
Or, how about the BART shooting. The black kid was handcuffed and face down on the floor of the subway/train coach, probably said some sh*t, and one cop pulled out his gun and shot him in the back, killing him. He got 3 months? I forget.*
In America, because folks are armed here - especially since concealed carry laws - countless crimes are prevented by CCW holders (but the press doesn't report it. Why? Because they care about the people? Give me a break. The states that have run with CCW laws have witnessed a HUGE reduction in violent crime, robberies & B&E's of occupied dwellings.
Ever since England - after some scumbag went on a killing spree, (who knows if that's the truth, given the lies applied to almost every 'mass shooting' these days - and certainly in the past (Operation Gladio, for example), where one or two person's act(s) disarmed the nation and gun crimes and violent crimes went through the roof - especially armed burglaries of occupied dwellings. Then followed Australia (a clearly false flag event, that) and now NZ. I'm sure Australia's crime rates will follow England's (it's probably already provable); and NZ will quickly follow,.
Read some books by John Lott.
R.C.
*How often do you hear about Cops killing their wives and kids and then selves? They certainly do it at very disproportionately high rates. Why? Mostly because they're going through a divorce and the angry wife threatens to speak of all the illegal things the hubby has confessed to her during marriage.
And YOU want us to give up guns so THEY can protect us?
RC
The 2nd amendment had nothing to do with indians it was directed at a tyrannical government. Not about hunting, not about sports, not about targets and not about Indians. Have a cup of coffee before you answer back
I prefer to disagree. Shooting Indians was at least part of it. "The only good Indian is a dead Indian". Regardless, I sure wish people would get excited about amendments that matter, like the ones about free speech and illegal search and seizure. The only amendment left is the one that encourages self-destruction, mayhem and runaway anger. Do you need an AK-47 to bring down a couple of ducks? The idea of repelling a government takeover is ludicrous. They have lots of bigger, better weapons, like tanks and sonic debilitators. If you have a gun in your hand when the troops come swooping through, you are the first target. We can't stop violence with more violence. They don't seem to need truckloads of guns for everyone in other countries. How do they get by? I would never condone taking away all the guns, but I sure wish people could spend more time talking to each other and discussing differences instead of eliminating the other side.
Unless you happened to accidentally hit one in the head, the hydraulic shock would ruin the duck meat anyway.
R.C.
I first fired a rifle at age 5. We set up a little range behind our home in the flat hardpan Mojave desert. (There were only two other houses in view from ours.)
Target shooting outdoors is flat out fun. And the law in America still (theoretically) is, it's legal to do anything, provided it's not been validly made illegal. That's called a state of freedom.
Meanwhile, where we're headed is this: All things no prohibited, ... are mandatory. THAT IS DESPOTISM.
R.C.
R.C.
How can people be uneducated, so gullible, so naive? All you have to do is look to history to find out what happens when people give up their personal rights for the false security promised by well meaning but ignorant and shallow fools. I mean the guy is talking high treason and there's still idiots voting for him, and why? Because of the accomplice mass media whom are selling high treason as a solution when, in reality is virtually assured they are all complicit in a criminal plot.
Didn't people learn anything from Adolf and his buddies, or Stalin and his mass murdering minions, or Mao, or Pol Pot, Idi Amin Dada and the hit just keep on coming. Stupid is as stupid does. The guy is a traitor, he's stoking the fires for a civil war, he and his kind are going get millions killed and does he give a shit or that what he vow's he will do can only result in civil war, mass murder, and the complete destruction of his own nation. What a Fool...
Get em while they is hot because with retards like this running the political system it is virtually assured that someday soon you're going to need one.
[Link]
Molon Labe bitches!