
© ShutterstockIs the universe a spinner?
If you look around space, you'll notice a lot of things —
the planets, stars, moons, even the galaxy itself — have one thing in common: they're spinning. So, is the universe spinning, too?This mystery is one that cosmologists have been acutely studying, because it's one that can tell us about the fundamental nature of the universe.
"It's a very abstract question, as is most of cosmology, but those of us who study cosmology think it's a way to study fundamental physics," said Tess Jaffe, an astrophysicist at the University of Maryland and an assistant research scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center. "There are certain things we cannot test in a laboratory on Earth, so we use the universe and the geometry of the universe, which could tell us something about fundamental physics."
Scientists, in thinking about the universe's fundamental nature, started out by assuming that the universe is not rotating and is isotropic, meaning it looks the same in all directions. This assumption is consistent with
Einstein's equations, but isn't required by them. From this thinking, scientists built a standard of cosmological model that describes the universe.
"This [assumption] is really encoded in the way we carry out our calculations, the way we analyze our data, in the way we do a lot of things," Daniela Saadeh, a research fellow in the School of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom, told Live Science. "But you have to test it. You can't just hope for the best."
To see if these assumptions about the universe and its fundamental physics were right, scientists gathered observations to test their models. In particular, they used the light from the
cosmic microwave background, or CMB for short. This light is the oldest that we can observe — emitted just 380,000 years after the
Big Bang — and is a treasure trove of information for cosmologists studying the universe.
The CMB looks nearly identical in every direction, but there are tiny variations in its temperature, just a thousandth of a degree, that have been affected by the history, content and geometry of the universe. By studying these differences, scientists can see whether the universe has been warped in any way, which would suggest rotation or expansion that is increased in one direction more than another. Measurements of the light's polarization — essentially its orientation — can similarly provide information on the universe's geometry.
Scientists found that the CMB light shows no evidence that the universe is rotating. Additionally, the likelihood that the universe is isotropic is 120,000 to 1, meaning that it looks the same no matter which direction you look, according to a 2016 study in the journal
Physical Review Letters lead by Saadeh and Stephen Feeney, an astrophysicist at Imperial College London. Another
study found a 95% chance that the universe is homogeneous — meaning it is the same everywhere on large scales.
All of these studies suggest that the universe is largely uniform and not spinning. This conclusion is one that's not likely to change. Future measurements of the polarization of the CMB may improve in the next few decades, but the new data is unlikely to challenge the
previous findings.
"We've characterized the [temperature] signal that is there, down to basically where it doesn't have any further information for us," Jaffe told Live Science. "I don't think that [new polarization data] would have a big impact on the question of the rotation, precisely because the rotation is the signal we'd expect to see at very large scales and that has been more or less ruled out by the data we already have."
While the result that the universe is not rotating is certainly a relief for the cosmologists who had based their models on this assumption, it also gives us an interesting perspective on our place in the universe.
"We really started as humans from this idea that we were the
center of the universe," Saadeh said. "I think it's really fascinating how tiny and insignificant we are."
Reader Comments
The best i can reason is we are inside an electrical field and the edge of the universe is simply the outer reach of the electrical field with which we reside.
In some other layer of reality our entire universe could be on a wild ride to power another entity's blender or toaster, and the variable resistance against our universe's electrical energy waveform is what we perceive as the expansion and retraction of our universe itself.
It is a possibility that from our inception at a power plant "big bang" to the end of our travels in a blender motor we only lasted ten seconds of reality to that dimension, but to us was perceived as billions of years.
Kinda like the bacteria in your toilet when you flush it. They must think that shit's a boomin' having had time to fruitfully multiply and inhabit their entire environment then get flushed away. Its a long time for them, but only a couple hours to us.
I know, I am a strange fuck.
The scale of a proton / atom is much the same as the scale for the sun / solar system
T he size of a neutron is 10^-15m and the size of a atom is 10^-10m
The size of the sun is 10^8m and the size of our solar system is 2 x 10^13m
(I just looked these up so hopefully I have the correct figures in metres)
What if our universe is no more than part of a atom within another universe.
To declare that our universe doesn't spin, is to support a claim that we know it's limitations and can see beyond its boundaries.
Just like the medical industry, the money is in the research that never really solves the greater issues.
Keep the masses confused, compromise the political system & own the central banks.
Okay, if the (this, our) universe is defined as 'all that exists that we know about, can know about, or might reasonably hypothesize', then arguably there is nothing else outside of it that permits a shape, an edge, or whatever. But I'm not totally comfortable with absolute concepts like infinity, forever, always, and such - I believe these terms merely serve as ideas, place(less)-markers, or poetic exaggerations.
Perhaps the furthest that telescopes and such have penetrated is the same distance in all directions? If so, that would indicate that the 'universe' is spherical, or rather, was round some X billion years ago.
Of course, if it's spinning, it's probably round. Isn't this fun?
As you correctly queried, from any observation point, any sufficiently large object will appear as spherical
For that to happen the Earth would have to be in the center of the universe.
[Link]
I reckon a Mc Donald's, they seem to have them everywhere now and days.
Why do I not see the stars in relative motion to the earth?
They all sit there blinking at me throughout the night.
Would someone be kind enough to explain that.
When you think you have done that, i have another question about the air pressure on earth.
Shalom
As far as earth pressure, ask HVAC.
Conversely, if (you) are standing at the equator (you) spinning faster. At the equator, the earth spins at the same speed as at the poles. If not …. Do not confuse yourself with the higher linear velocity at the equator. That is not angular or rotational speed.
So, the question of how the stars stare at you throughout the night without relative movement to the earths rotational speed has to do with your perception of time not speed . Do you by any chance know there is a direct relation between speed and time?
Shalom
Unless of course, the bodies in space are moving with the same velocity of Earth.
Alpha Centauri is practically 4.37 light years away from Earth. Do the necessary calculation for the end of your vision to that start complex.
It will be in the billions of mph, yet we see it.
Think!
Shalom
Let me share a simple question or two with you -
Space is a vacuum. Earth is in the same space. Why therefore does Earth have a pressure of 14.7 psi (1 atm) on its surface?
From whence comes the air?
Shalom
Try this one - regardless of how many directions of motion, how many different orbits and difference distances, all stars are visible 24/7
In other words, no star ever occludes another one
We are meant to ignore such problems and instead assert our perfect knowledge ... all we have to finally work out is whether the universe spins or not
The speed is proportional to the size of the Earth at the equator (24,860 miles or 40,008 km), that's results in a complete rotational spin of 24 hours.
The background stars do appear to move with Earth but at a slower pace.
Why not slow-down, read carefully what i am asking before you even attempt to respond.
Shalom
Thank you for your reply, always nice to hear from a new face
Your post does however, have ambiguity written over it.
So in future good chap, take folks responses with a cheery pinch of salt.