Society's Child
Two city lawmakers want to recruit everyday New Yorkers to help battle the scourge of idling vehicles by paying them for video footage that results in fines.
City Council members Helen Rosenthal (D-Manhattan) and Donovan Richards (D-Queens) will introduce a bill Wednesday that would give citizens up to 50 percent of the summons revenue if they catch someone breaking the idling law, take a video and submit it to the Department of Environmental Protection.
The exact cut for videographers would be determined by the DEP, they said. But citizen enforcers could makes hundreds — even thousands — of dollars.
The bill would keep first-time idling violations punishable by just a warning, but would boost fines for second offenses to between $350 and $1,500.
Any subsequent violations within a two-year period would yield even heftier fines of between $440 and $2,000.
Citizens seeking to cash in on their videos would first have to undergo training by the DEP, which would be offered five days per year under current plans.
"On my block alone, I could produce 20 tickets a day, easily," said banker George Pakenham, an anti-idling advocate who made a documentary on the issue called "Idle Threat" in 2012.
He says that he has documented his own encounters with roughly 2,900 idlers over a five-year period, and that he was successful in getting 80 percent of them to turn off their engines by pointing out the environmental impact and the city laws.
"This is going to be the thing that makes the entire difference," Pakenham said of the bill. "This will be just the tonic to have people engaged and earn a great deal of money along the way."
According to council documents, idling limits of three minutes have been in place in the city since 1971. The restrictions were recently shortened to just one minute for vehicles standing in front of schools.
But data show that despite repeated efforts by lawmakers to toughen the law, enforcement has remained sporadic at best.
In 2002, 325 idling violations were issued by three city agencies combined, while 526 violations were issued in 2007, according to council records.
Last year, just 209 violations were issued — yielding a paltry $93,010 in total fines, according to the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings.
"We can pass these laws, we've strengthened the fines . . . but the real problem is enforcement," said Rosenthal. "You're obviously upping the interest by having people share in the fine."
She said her office has fielded hordes of complaints about tour buses that linger in front of the Upper West Side's Dakota Building, where John Lennon was killed.
"It's been such a challenge to get police or DEP enforcement out there," Rosenthal said.
Reader Comments
i'm gonna go up to any of the bridges and main thorough-fares at rush hour and just start takin' video of the long lines of traffic that don't move (the definition of idling) for serious amounts of time. Any time you're stopped at a light YOU'RE IDLING. What a bunch of dumb-asses these legislators have become.
What is the worst mistake a person can make?
To imagine you're alive and well when you're actually dead.
To daydream you're free, when you are a slave.
To think you are awake, while fast asleep.
To drive your car more and more and more, while going and getting nowhere.
Making more and more money and getting deeper and deeper into debt.
But, b-bbut, we're almost there!
Where?
ned
With Obama we've clearly seen that no matter who you vote for, you get the same policies, agenda and effect.
Since all candidates are vetted via their "party machine" nobody who won't "play ball" with Wall Street/corporate America/wealthy business interests and lobbyists ever even gets on the ballot.
They system is so corrupted by money now that it may be irredeemable via 'legal' means, and probably not at all.
"Since all candidates are vetted via their "party machine" nobody who won't "play ball" with Wall Street/corporate America/wealthy business interests and lobbyists ever even gets on the ballot."
Absolutely correct, but it is the idiocy and/or apathy of the voting public that has allowed the party machines to accumulate and retain so much power in restricting choices. It's a positive feedback loop - stupid voters allow party hacks to control who the voters can vote for which further increases the power of the party hacks, etc., etc.
"They system is so corrupted by money now that it may be irredeemable via 'legal' means, and probably not at all."
IMO, there is only one "legal means" left that will work, but only if enough people do it. Specifically, the idea of refusing to support the system. If enough productive people voluntarily reduce their taxable income to minimize their tax obligation, the gov't runs out of the means to operate at the levels it has risen to: the nanny-state system will collapse and we would return to a minimalist gov't that the founders originally envisioned. It'll take some time and effort to make it happen, but without the financial support of what are currently NET tax-payers, i.e., those who pay more in taxes than they consume in gov't "services", the current system cannot be sustained.
If such a "starve the beast" strategy doesn't work (e.g., if enough people don't follow it), I agree that probably the only remaining "fix" will require extra-legal means. IMO, the PTB recognize this and that (NOT protection against terrorism) is why they are rapidly expanding their draconian police state - to protect themselves from the wrath of the people.
Hollywood War Films, An Instrument of Military Indoctrination: The “American Sniper” Reviewers’ Consensus
Since American Sniper has become one of the “top grossing films of all time”, garnering a few Academy Award nominations and at least one, if trivial, award, there have been even more reviews written about this insidious and insipid strip of celluloid. Unsurprisingly all of them contain the same swill. I had to return to my own review just to see if I had perhaps omitted anything essential or if anyone might have thought in an at least similar direction. continued






Comment: Turning Americans into snitches for the police state: 'See something, say something' and community policing