OF THE
TIMES

'A terrible crime. Arkady was a fearless and brilliant journalist, the best of his generation, committed to telling uncomfortable truths', gushed Luke Harding, author of 'Collusion: How Russia helped Trump win the White House'. His tweet was retweeted over 600 times, including by some leading members of the 'Punditocracy'. 'I do not know what it is if not the terrorism. There is no other word for it', wrote one person in reply. How about fakery? That fits quite nicely, I think.
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) condemned the Ukrainian intelligence stunt with staging the murder of journalist Arkady Babchenko, stating it damaged credibility of Kiev and harmed international journalism."Pseudo-moral." That single word says it all. The criminal minds involved in this are indignant at their 'normally-supportive' allies in the West, who are peeved at them for exposing them as gullible fools.
"The profession's aim is to seek the truth and ... any manipulation of information can dramatically damage media credibility as well as journalism as a whole," the IFJ said in a statement on Thursday. The staged murder of Babchenko by Ukrainian authorities, who was "killed" on May 29 only to reappear a day later during the secret service's press conference, reinforced "the idea of journalists and politicians conspiring together," the organizations' president Philippe Leruth said.
"By spreading false evidence about his murder, Ukrainian authorities have seriously eroded the credibility of information, and their communication runs the risk of being considered a propaganda operation. Was it really necessary to stage his death in order to stop an alleged attack?" Leruth wondered.
The stunt was also inappropriate due to the fact that "killers and their backers" of journalists who were indeed assassinated, such as Pavel Sheremet, have never been identified by Ukraine's authorities. While IJF condemns the killings and "fights against impunity, which benefits journalists' murderers," it also advocates transparency of information, Leruth stressed.
Moreover, the whole affair was "a complete circus orchestrated by military figures and a journalist," and it was not "simple journalistic case anymore," IFJ General Secretary Anthony Bellanger argued. The stunt misled journalists worldwide and "millions of citizens that were rightly moved by this so-called murder," he added.
Ukrainian authorities rushed to defend the stunt, with Interior Minister Arsen Avakov stating he was surprised with "pseudo-moral" criticism from abroad and that the secret services achieved with the operation "enough ... to be satisfied."
'If he hadn't turned up alive, Arkady dead would have become the thing most people called 'truth'..... No one - none of us - would think to question it. And anyone who did would be dismissed as a lunatic', Catte writes.
If Babchenko had stayed dead, then British neocons - the real lunatics in our midst - would be demanding fresh 'punishment' against Russia. There would have been renewed calls for Ofcom and/or the government to 'take action' against Russian media operating lawfully in Britain, such as RT and Sputnik. Would any mainstream politician or journalist have dared to speak out against the Russophobes? In an age where scepticism of official narratives is shamefully equated to treason- one very much doubts it. But outside of the gates of the Bastille, the people are fooled no more.
Comment: That chemical weapons were present in Douma is without question. Who they belonged to and who was supplying the manufacturing materials is another matter