Welcome to Sott.net
Sun, 29 Nov 2020
The World for People who Think

Chart Bar

Undeniable Mathematical Evidence The Election Was Stolen From Trump

biden fraud
According to CBS News, President Trump does not plan to concede in the event that the media declares Joe Biden the winner of the election, and elected the 46th president of the United States. The Trump campaign and its top advisers called for multiple lawsuits on the grounds that the ongoing vote count would result in tallying illegally cast ballots.

The lawsuits will amount to an aggressive effort to highlight anomalies, statistical impossibilities, or other perceived problems that could affect vote counts before a final presidential winner is declared.

Many reporters at press conferences that took place in Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Michigan on Thursday asked his political appointees and supporters for evidence of the wide-scale problems they alleged occurred.

If it is just the mathematical evidence Americans are looking for, there is endless evidence. Here are just the facts.

Comment: People have noticed the statistical improbabilities.

Will the Supreme Court recognise them?

It's supposed to be strictly impartial. If it is impartial in its deliberations, it will give the election to Trump.

But the SC may 'go political', if only - as its justices see it - to 'protect the reputation of American democracy'...




Here Sidney Powell comments on how as much as 3% of the vote total was changed in pre-election counting connected to 'Hammer' and 'Scorecard' software:


...which is a whole other 'score' on which this election was likely rigged: tabulation software that simply 'flipped' otherwise legal votes from Trump to Biden. So when Trump says 'only LEGAL votes must be counted', such a focus won't by itself uncover the extent of post-processing vote flipping.

What a sh*tshow!

Well, that's American (and thus 'Western') democracy for you...

UPDATE (11/8): Another metric: bellweather counties, i.e. counties known for results matching the final winner. Guess what, they voted Republican.



UPDATE (11/9): Even more data analytics suggestive of fraud. First, a graph showing the ballot count changes over time:


Click through to read the entire thread of this next one. It shows how Biden/Trump ratios changed over time in various states. Swing states show anomalies not found in non-swing states:


Here is the proportion of PA mail-in ballots that were returned suspiciously close to the time they mailed out (sometimes before). 109,421 suspicious ballots (3.53%):


Another possible 'glitch' or two:


Finally, not a voting statistic, but still statistically significant:

UPDATE: Another Benford analysis of Michigan:
Biden's vote numbers in Michigan do not match Benford's law at a 99.999% significance level.

Benfords law has been used on many occasions to prove election fraud (2000 & 2004 elections, 2003 California gubernatorial election, etc.).

Let me know if you would elaboration but the numbers can be computed in a spreadsheet using data taken from Michigan's election data tracker from individual precincts. For context, Biden scored a 0.0000017 and trump scored a 0.58.

While Benford's Law is not 100% proof that fraudulent data has been manufactured, "In the United States, evidence-based on Benford's law has been admitted in criminal cases at the federal, state, and local levels."

It was also used to determine fraud in the 2000 and 2004 U.S elections. I conducted a Chi-test comparing Michigan's precinct vote counts to Benford's law and found that Biden/Haris votes returned a, 0.000017% (Statistically significant, especially with a very large sample) whereas Trump/Pence votes returned a score of,
53.059791% and whilst looking at my data set I noticed there were 0 write-in votes in Michigan.

Very odd stuff.

This is the source I used for my data, https://detroitmi.gov/webapp/election-results.

Here are some pictures of the spreadsheets with a graph comparison of the expected results vs what actually happened.
benford trump

Trump's data matches the law (not manufactured vote counts)
benford biden

Biden's data differs greatly (fake data)
The highlighted percentage value tells you how sure you can be that fraud was committed, typically a score below 0.05 is statistically significant, and Biden scored a 0.00000017



SOTT Logo Radio

MindMatters: Brainwashing Is Easy, Thinking Isn't

thought control
Covid-19. Trump. Social Justice. War. Human rights. Economics. Whatever the issue, it seems that every day we are being told we must adopt a particular position. And to do so "or else". Under incredible pressure to be in the right and to feel good about ourselves, we are bombarded with "ways to think" that are quite often delivered by overt propaganda, but that are also, perhaps more than we realize, covert and not aware to us consciously. How do the social programmers do this? Who are they? And what knowledge of psychology do they use to meet their agendas? Is it possible that many of the views which we hold dear are actually prefabricated for us?

This week on MindMatters we delve into some of the big social, cultural and political issues of the day, the perspectives we take on them, and how it is we come to a specific understanding or stance on something. Questioning what we believe - and why we do - is a responsibility we all take upon ourselves, for ourselves - but also for others. At a time in human history when truth is under egregious attack, how might one effectively examine one's own thinking? And how do we know when our thoughts are or aren't our own?

Show sources:

Running Time: 01:13:20

Download: MP3 — 67.1 MB


Alarm Clock

Election 2020: It's Clear Where This is All Headed...

timebomb
Just as I successfully predicted the outcome of the 2016 election months in advance, my predictions on the 2020 election are now coming to pass. In July of this year in my article 'Election 2020: The Worst Case Scenario Is The Most Likely One', after I outlined the strange factors surrounding Biden and Trump, I stated that:
"These factors and more lead me to predict that Election 2020 will be a contested election which ends with Trump staying in office but accused of usurping the democratic process. This outcome is the worst possible outcome and also the most advantageous for the globalist establishment."
I also noted the predictive programming campaign by the media and members of the Council On Foreign Relations like Max Boot to acclimate the public to the idea of a contested election while also "wargaming" (planning) that exact outcome. I stated:
"...Boot is back again, this time writing about how he thinks Donald Trump will try to "hijack" the presidency in 2020.

In an article for the Washington post titled 'What If Trump Loses But Insists He Won', Boot outlines a scenario that was "war gamed" by a group called the Transition Integrity Project. The group played out a scenario in which there is a razor thin victory for Joe Biden, followed by actions by Trump to keep control of the presidency through lies and legal wrangling. The group also predicted civil unrest leading to potential "civil war" as the fight over the White House expands.

This article is, I believe, an attempt at predictive programming by the establishment. They are TELLING US exactly what is about to happen. A contested election, civil war, martial law, economic collapse and the US will be destroyed from within."

Comment: Indeed. Though it may be disturbing to see things play out in real time, it is quite true to say that we have seen a number of stories showing the likelihood of what was coming - and what we're now witnessing, or something like it:


USA

Time to Put 'Democratic Security' Strategies to Work to #StopTheSteal

trump rally new jersey january 2020

Trump rally in Wildwood, NJ, January 28, 2020
Trump and his supporters must now employ "Democratic Security" strategies such as staging large-scale but very peaceful rallies in his support in the remaining undeclared states in order to stop the steal that the Democrats are conniving to commit, but even if (or rather, when) he's declared the victor, the "deep state" and their proxies might have already thrown the election's legitimacy into doubt through their last-ditch attempt to defraud the vote, thus setting the stage for a possibly unprecedented intensification of the decades-long Hybrid War of Terror on America.

The decades-long Hybrid War of Terror on America might be about to experience an unprecedented intensification after it first went kinetic over the summer as a result of the Democrats' last-ditch effort to defraud the vote by temporarily suspending the release of ballot counting in the remaining undeclared states. As it stands, Trump is correct in stating that it's almost statistically impossible for them to steal his victory, yet he's taking those states to court in order to defend the integrity of the country's democratic process despite declaring that he already feels like he won. It's not the incumbent that's taking America to the brink of domestic disaster, but his opponent, or rather the Democrat candidate's handlers (since it's visibly obvious that Biden doesn't have full control of his mental faculties) who are desperately trying to throw Trump's re-election into doubt for the purpose of providing ammunition for the next four years of their information war against him.

USA

Breaking a Lance in Support of Trump

Trump buy American
Fair warning: I'll squarely defend Trump in this article. I'll hone in on the good things he has done. Lo' and behold: there are many. With Trump's press coverage being 95% negative, I think that approach is needed, necessary and long-overdue.

I tried to make each section readable in and by itself. So skim over the headlines, pick a topic, read a bit, get upset (because "I defend the orange monster") and think: what if?

SOTT Logo Radio

Objective:Health - The Pharma Deluge: How Much Medication is Too Much?

O:H header
Back in the good old days, people would generally take a medication, one at a time, when they were sick, and discontinue it when they were well. But we currently live in an age where it is relatively common for people, particularly the elderly, to be taking multiple medications, (often 10 or more) for years, if not a lifetime. This is known as polypharmacy: the concurrent use of multiple medications by a patient, and the problem is only growing.

In the US, 31% of older adults were taking 5 or more medications per year in 2006. Five years later, that number had increased to 36% . In a Swedish population study, 17% of adults were taking five or more drugs per day in 2006. This had increased to 19% in 2014.

To make matters worse, their are few to no studies actually looking at the effects of taking multiple drugs at a time - particularly in elderly patients. The fact is, no one knows what this is actually doing to us.

Join us on this episode of Objective:Health when we explore the question: Do we really need all these drugs?


And check us out on Brighteon and lbry.tv!

For other health-related news and more, you can find us on:

♥Twitter: https://twitter.com/objecthealth
♥Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/objecthealth/
♥Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channel/objectivehealth

♥And you can check out all of our previous shows (pre YouTube) here.

Running Time: 00:31:48

Download: MP3 — 29.1 MB


Gold Seal

A Biden Presidency Means 'The Return of the Blob'

return of the blob
What happens on November 3rd? It's like a larger than life replay of the famous Hollywood adage: "No one knows anything."

The Dem strategy is crystal clear, spawned by the gaming of election scenarios embedded in the Transition Integrity Project and made even more explicit by one of TIP's co-founders, a law professor at Georgetown University.

Hillary Clinton, bluntly, has already called it: Dems must re-take the White House by any and all means and under any and all circumstances.

And just in case, with a 5,000-word opus, she already positioned herself for a plum job.

As much as Dems have made it very clear they will never accept a Trump victory, the counterpunch was vintage Trump: he told the Proud Boys to "stand back" - as in no violence, for now - but crucially to "stand by", as in "get ready".

The stage is set for Kill Bill mayhem on November 3rd and beyond.

Wreath

Always Covid & Never Christmas: Breaking the Spell That Holds us in its Grip

narnia
"Boris Johnson? Who is he?" asked Lucy.
"Why, it is he that has got all Covidia under his thumb," said Mr Tumnus. "It's he that makes it always Covid. Always Covid and never Christmas; think of that!"
- The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, CS Lewis (with a few changes)
Were he around today, I have no doubt that C.S. Lewis, one of the 20th Century's greatest intellects, would be utterly scathing of what the British Government has done to this country over the past 7 months, given that it has been the very epitome of the scientific and technocratic oligarchy he warned us about decades ago. And so I feel somewhat at liberty to take his comment about the White Witch turning Narnia into perpetual winter without joy and without Christmas, and apply it to our own situation in the land of Covidia (which is where you now live) - a place of perpetual fear and misery, where ordinary life is impossible, and where any hints of joy breaking out must be nipped in the bud before they are allowed to grow to challenge the new winter normal that is settling fast around us.

The words may even turn out to be literally true. In Scotland, they are already talking about what they call a digital Christmas, whatever absurdity that is, whilst in England a psychological game of Good Cop/Bad Cop is going on, with Comrade de Pfeffel Johnson apparently desperately hoping that we'll all have a normal Christmas, but with members of the ironically named SAGE committee saying this is wishful thinking. Who will win out? Of course the Bad Cops will win out, but no doubt carefully managed and cleverly messaged to present it as a kind of victory for Good Cop, whereby he wangles some concessions for us, such as a relaxation of the Rule of 6 to the Rule of 6+1 for a day, so that Great Aunt Maud doesn't have to spend the day alone, and with Rishi Sunak perhaps pledging some more of his magic beans to fund subsidised turkeys. Come to think of it, cut-price turkeys would be a fairly apt metaphor for those in charge of this debacle. But lest they try to befuddle us with silly details over the next few weeks, hold this thought front and centre: The idea that anyone should need permission from the likes of de Pfeffel Johnson and his crew to be able to celebrate with their family and relations the coming of the King of Kings into the world is beyond parody.

SOTT Logo Radio

MindMatters: The Weird World of Color Perception and Adaptation: Interview with Dr. Katie Tregillus

tregillus
Everyone likes a good optical illusion, but fewer understand them. Today we interview Katie Tregillus PhD about her research on color perception and adaptation. Katie takes us through the strange and complex world of color, from basic physiology up to conscious perception. How can different people looking at the same image 'see' totally different colors? How do colored lenses change our perception of the world of color? And what are some of the craziest visual illusions and perceptual adaptations known in the field today? All this and more today on MindMatters.


Running Time: 01:28:16

Download: MP3 — 80.8 MB


SOTT Logo Radio

Objective:Health: - D‌eath in Covid Vaccine Study - No Safety Concerns?‌

O:H header
A participant in the trials of a Covid-19 vaccine being developed by AstraZeneca and Oxford University has died. Seems like kind of a big deal. But the authorities have assured us that, after a "thorough" review, there's nothing to worry about and the trials are proceding. AstraZeneca said in a statement that it could not comment on individual cases but it "can confirm that all required review processes have been followed... These assessments have not led to any concerns about continuation of the ongoing study." Very reassuring.

As could be expected, there is very little information given about the circumstances surrounding the death, and what has been released has been confusing and contradictory. Some are reporting that the participant wasn't in the vaccine group, but was in the placebo group, but then the placebo group, apparently, aren't getting an inert substance, but are instead getting a meningitis vaccine. But the guy didn't die from that vaccine either, he died of Covid related complications. So how exactly did that happen?

Join us on this episode of Objective:Health as we try to sort through this mess and talk about other aspects of the vaccine of the century.


And check us out on Brighteon and lbry.tv!

For other health-related news and more, you can find us on:

♥Twitter: https://twitter.com/objecthealth
♥Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/objecthealth/
♥Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channel/objectivehealth

♥And you can check out all of our previous shows (pre YouTube) here.

Running Time: 00:35:35

Download: MP3 — 32.6 MB