© Sputnik / Mikhail Voskresensky
Russian servicemen have found another evidence of manufacturing of military poisonous substances by Jaish al-Islam terrorists in the Syrian town of Douma, where on April 7 a false-flag attack took place, serving as a pretext for the US and allies to blame the government and strike the country.
"During the examination of the chemical laboratory
a lot of hexamin was discovered, which is yet more proof that militants had been producing chemical weapons," a specialist of Russia's radiological, chemical and biological defense corps, Alexander Rodionov, told journalists on April 20.
He explained that the substance is used for making explosives,
as well as sarin-type nerve agents.
On April 17, Russian servicemen
found a laboratory in Douma which could have been used by terrorists to manufacture chemical weapons. A former member of the UN's biological commission told Sputnik that it was "highly likely" that the lab's equipment was made
in Germany or the UK.
The Russian Defense Ministry has reported that militants left Douma on April 13 - over 21,00 of them and their family members moved out of the town via humanitarian corridors. The following day OPCW experts were scheduled to enter Douma to investigate an an incident that occurred on April 7 - which Western countries consider a government-conducted chemical attack based on social media "evidence" and the notorious White Helmets' "accounts" - but on that day the United States, Britain and France
launched a powerful missile attack on Syria.
Russia and Syria have maintained that the incident was a false flag attack, a provocation serving to justify aggression against the sovereign state, and have called for an investigation. At the same time, the claims of the "attack" were disproved by
a boy whom the White Helmets presented as a victim,
his father, a hospital's
staff and Russian specialists who established that there was
no trace of poisoning in the area.
A month before the Douma false flag attack and the ensuing strike,
the Russian General Staff had warned about such a development.
Comment: So far the only evidence of a chemical attack is the say-so of alleged refugees in Turkey. It's all hearsay. Every reporter on the ground reports no evidence of chemical attack. All the locals are either unaware of a chemical attack, or testify that the White Helmets faked the scene in the Douma hospital. Douma may just go down as the first false-flag in the modern era that was completely debunked within weeks of it happening. It's sad really. And more than a tad humiliating for FUKUS. See:
Investigative reporter interviews Douma residents, all say they witnessed no signs of chemical attack
Western propagandists say all these witnesses must have been coerced by the Syrian government to deny that the attack took place. Yet those same propagandists refuse to apply the same standard to the alleged refugees in Turkey: could they not have been coerced to say that it did take place? And if they are tied to Jaysh al-Islam, would they not have a motive for lying, too? As it is, the balance of probability leans strongly towards the account from randomly chosen residents of Douma: their identities can be verified, unlike those in Turkey.
Comment: So far the only evidence of a chemical attack is the say-so of alleged refugees in Turkey. It's all hearsay. Every reporter on the ground reports no evidence of chemical attack. All the locals are either unaware of a chemical attack, or testify that the White Helmets faked the scene in the Douma hospital. Douma may just go down as the first false-flag in the modern era that was completely debunked within weeks of it happening. It's sad really. And more than a tad humiliating for FUKUS. See: Investigative reporter interviews Douma residents, all say they witnessed no signs of chemical attack
Western propagandists say all these witnesses must have been coerced by the Syrian government to deny that the attack took place. Yet those same propagandists refuse to apply the same standard to the alleged refugees in Turkey: could they not have been coerced to say that it did take place? And if they are tied to Jaysh al-Islam, would they not have a motive for lying, too? As it is, the balance of probability leans strongly towards the account from randomly chosen residents of Douma: their identities can be verified, unlike those in Turkey.