OF THE
TIMES
The New York Times had the story all the way back in 2004 and squashed it after Weinstein himself appeared at the NYT headquarters and muscled the paper into silence.Zerohedge reports that Sharon Waxman, the founding editor of The Wrap and formerly an entertainment industry reporter at the Times, revealed in a blog post published Sunday that she had reported out a similar story back in 2004, only for it to be quashed by top editors at the paper, who, instead of encouraging her to pursue the story, questioned its value and relevance after Weinstein had reportedly made a personal appeal demanding that it not be run.
Sharon Waxman is the founder of The Wrap and a former New York Times reporter. She said she "gagged" when she read Jim Rutenberg's sanctimonious piece on Saturday about the "media enablers" who kept this story from the public for decades.
Waxman wrote about having the Weinstein scoop when she was a new reporter at the New York Times back in 2004 but after Weinstein, Matt Damon and Russel Crowe pressured her to stop her hit piece, the story was gutted.
My board is thinking of firing me. All I'm asking, is let me take a leave of absence and get into heavy therapy and counseling. Whether it be in a facility or somewhere else, allow me to resurrect myself with a second chance. A lot of the allegations are false as you know but given therapy and counseling as other people have done, I think I'd be able to get there.And it wasn't just media and the Hollywood scene running damage control for Weinstein. Apparently the NYPD was ready to arrest Weinstein in 2015 after an Italian model accused him of groping her. Weinstein had invited her to his office. When she arrived, the assistant left, Weinstein asked her if her breasts were real, then groped her, stuck his hand under her skirt, and asked for a kiss, according to the model, Ambra Battilana. She left 31 minutes after arriving in the building, according to surveillance cameras, and a friend took her to the nearest police station. Before she could make a "controlled call" to Weinstein, suggested by the police in the hope that he would incriminate himself, he called her, asking for another meeting. At the detectives' urging, she agreed, but wore a wire. According to an NYPD commander, he "basically apologized", then invited her up to his room - "Just to show you how incorrigible the guy is".
I could really use your support or just your honesty if you can't support me.
But if you can, I need you to send a letter to my private gmail address. The letter would only go to the board and no one else. We believe what the board is trying to do is not only wrong but might be illegal and would destroy the company. If you could write this letter backing me, getting me the help and time away I need, and also stating your opposition to the board firing me, it would help me a lot. I am desperate for your help. Just give me the time to have therapy. Do not let me be fired. If the industry supports me, that is all I need.
With all due respect, I need the letter today.
Ambra Battilana excused herself to use the restroom and she was met by a detective from the special victims unit, which had been using two cellphones to record this March 28, 2015, meeting in the bar/restaurant at the Tribeca Grand Hotel in downtown Manhattan. Battilana seemed close to panic. The detective promised her that she would be safely under protective surveillance if she went along with Weinstein's request.Filmmaker Alex Gibney, who is working on a documentary on Roger Ailes, says this is just the beginning:
Battilana agreed and headed upstairs with Weinstein. The detectives were close behind, ready to move in immediately if Weinstein tried to grope her again as she alleged he had earlier. He would have been caught in the act.
But Battilana suddenly backed away and departed.
"She got scared," the police commander says.
Battilana returned downstairs. Weinstein joined her. The detectives moved in. They took him away for questioning that immediately ceased when he asked for a lawyer, in particular an attorney from the firm whose partners included former Mayor Rudy Giuliani. A Weinstein spokeswoman would deny the allegations.
The detectives were still able to bring the Manhattan district attorney's office a case that was considerably stronger than is routinely needed to convict less illustrious gropers in the subway.
...
But by several accounts the Manhattan district attorney's office was still feeling the aftershocks of the disastrous Dominique Strauss-Kahn case in 2011. ... Since then, the DA had seemed to knowledgeable observers to be leery of another high-profile debacle. That worry could have only increased as prosecutors learned that Battilana had accused a wealthy elderly boyfriend in Italy of forcing her into sex when she was just 17. She had also figured in the prosecution of Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, testifying that she had witnessed one of his "bunga bunga" sex parties when she was 19.
At the prospect of her now figuring as the victim in a case against a high-profile figure such as Harvey Weinstein, the DA's office seemed to hesitate. The DA's office asked the SVU questions and the SVU answered them and the DA's office asked more questions that the SVU also answered.
"They knocked it around about a week, back and forth," the NYPD commander says.
The DA's office finally reached an official determination, following what a spokesman rightly described as "a thorough investigation."
"After analyzing the available evidence, including multiple interviews with both parties, a criminal charge is not supported," the spokeswoman announced.
The NYPD commander offers a different analysis based on long experience.
"When you say no after a week, it's not usually over the facts," he suggests.
Hesitation by prosecutors does not engender confidence in victims. Battilana had initially seemed sure of a speedy resolution, posting on Instagram three days after the alleged groping, "Don't stop dreaming just because you had a nightmare." She seems to have afterward lost faith in the system and is said to have reached a monetary settlement with Weinstein, apparently leaving town so she was unavailable.
"They paid her off," says someone with inside knowledge of the Weinstein response to the incident.
"Anybody who's in the entertainment business or in the movie business had heard rumors [about Weinstein], but you know you have to be careful. The trick is proving that the rumors are true, but yeah, this had been one of those stories you kept hearing about and kept wondering," he said.
...
"There are lots of rumors of men in power who abuse that power for sexual favors. And there are a lot of beautiful women in the movie industry," Gibney said. "There are a lot of rumors swirling around a lot of people both in the present and the past."
...
"It's not just Hollywood, I think it's power in general. There's a reason why the powerful escape scrutiny for so long - it's because people want something from them. If you're an actress, you want to get a role, if you're a producer, you want a deal, and along the way people start making little compromises that end up being one big compromise. I don't think it's limited to Hollywood. We're talking about Scientology, we're talking about the Catholic Church. Wherever there's power, there's abuse of power, and there's a kind of collective responsibility for allowing those abuses to continue."
Comment: The issues in Spain and the EU regarding Catalonia are just beginning.
More from RT: See also: