OF THE
TIMES

"insufficient evidence ... to recommend either for or against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19."The process for reaching that non-recommendation, however, is opaque. The Panel members responsible for therapy recommendations are disclosed and also that:
"... working groups propose updates to the Guidelines based on the latest published research findings and evolving clinical information."However, NIH has gone to extreme efforts to avoid stating whether a vote was held to endorse the ivermectin non-recommendation. This includes fighting a Freedom of Information Act request in federal court. A deceptive non-vote would constitute an atrocity. NIH has also been secretive about the composition of the working group that proposed the ivermectin non-recommendation. The names of those individuals were redacted by the NIH from a document obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request for the agenda of a meeting considering ivermectin.
"MMFA has, from inception, operated as a thinly veiled partisan political organization supporting Democratic candidates for office and engaging in other improper activities,"The group outlined four parameters groups must follow in order to maintain their 501(c)(3) status with the IRS. They include:
Avoidance of unnecessary references to any election; Avoidance of unnecessary references to individuals' candidacies; Objective, factual analysis of candidates when they are referenced; and Avoidance of candidate characterizations which may endorse or oppose them in the race.
"This is quite literally a matter of life and death for our Soldiers, their families and the communities in which we live. Case counts and deaths continue to be concerning as the Delta variant spreads, which makes protecting the force through mandatory vaccination a health and readiness priority for the total Army."The military's largest branch issued its mandate after the other services announced similar timelines.
Comment: Some background on the case from the New York Post: