Comment: Now that's one opening paragraph loaded with assumptions and inaccuracies - the ones that the public is supposed to swallow. Think of what the following words imply: "analysts", "believe", "rebel forces", "civil war", "assessment", "pressure", "deeply divided", "response", "provocation" and "red line".
What they are trying to make us believe is that the good and noble people of the Obama administration have been trying to reach the Truth ("analysts") about this messy business that Assad got himself into ("civil war"). Against the best intentions of Obama and Friends to not get involved, Assad has finally proven himself to be a tyrant of the type that uses weapons of mass destruction against his own people ("rebels"). Therefore, and in spite of the internal divisions, the pressure this new evidence delivers is too much to bear and a red line has been crossed. Action must be taken ("provocation")!
According to an internal memorandum circulating inside the government on Thursday, the "intelligence community assesses that the Assad regime has used chemical weapons on a small scale against the opposition multiple times in the last year." President Obama said in April that the United States had physiological evidence that the nerve gas sarin had been used in Syria, but lacked proof of who used it and under what circumstances. He now believes that the proof is definitive, according to American officials.
Comment: Of course, you need to tell lies step by step to make sure that the public gets used to the idea they will want you to accept later. It is called priming.
But a flurry of high-level meetings in Washington this week only underscored the splits within the Obama administration about what actions to take to quell the fighting, which has claimed more than 90,000 people. The meetings were hastily arranged after Mr. Assad's troops - joined by fighters from the militant group Hezbollah - claimed the strategic city of Qusayr and raised fears in Washington that large parts of the rebellion could be on the verge of collapse.
Senior State Department officials have been pushing for an aggressive military response, including airstrikes to hit the primary landing strips in Syria that the government uses to launch the chemical weapons attacks, ferry troops around the country, and receive shipments of matรฉriel from Iran. But White House officials remain wary, and one American official said that a meeting on Wednesday of the president's senior advisers yielded no firm decisions about how to proceed.
Comment: Oh, but they will. And it won't be friendly.
Comment: Remember Colin Powell making a fool of himself at the United Nations before the Iraq war, trying to convince the world that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction?
No, most of you probably don't. And that's part of the problem.
In the meantime this 'reversive blockade', where the Western elite, led by the Psychopaths in Power in Washington DC, accuse the Syrian government of the very thing its Al Qaeda terrorist cells are doing to ordinary Syrians, takes the world one step closer to total chaos in the Middle East and beyond.
UN: Rebels - Not Syrian Government - Used Chemical Weapons
Syria chemical weapons allegations could be 'Israeli false flag operation' says former Bush official
U.S. 'planned to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad'
Chemical weapons charade in Syria
Hogwash, Syria won't use chemical WMDs against its people