OF THE
TIMES


"The incident which happened two days ago in the skies over Syria defies common sense and international law. The plane was shot down over Syrian territory. And we have yet to receive an intelligible apology from Turkey on a top political level, " [the Russian President Putin] said.---
"I think if there is a party that needs to apologize, it is not us," [the Turkish President Erdogan] said. "Those who violated our airspace are the ones who need to apologize. Our pilots and our armed forces, they simply fulfilled their duties, which consisted of responding to ... violations of the rules of engagement. I think this is the essence."Erdogan did not take the exit ramp Putin offered. So who will win this contest?

Comment: The commentary and excuses of rats leaving the ship are piled high and deep as NATO/the West wiggles out of blame. It is evident, in this article anyway, that the some of the news sources cannot distinguish "church" from "state." How does one get a political and military alliance of NATO members against "Islamism?" ...not even Islam, but 'Islamism!"
However, another source opines: "Turkey's action, using US-supplied F-16 planes, was taken with the full knowledge and advance support of the US. In fact, given Turkey's vassal status as a member of US-dominated NATO, it could well be that Ankara was put up to this act of brinksmanship by the US."
By virtue of the West's alliance, should Russia retaliate against Turkey, NATO would be obliged to come to Turkey's defense. Kudos to Putin's restraint, and, unlike the US/NATO, to operating within the boundaries of international law.