
© Lucas Jackson/Reuters
The UN Security Council has adopted a roadmap for peace in Syria.
Unfortunately, according to journalist Manlio Dinucci,
the roadmap can't lead anywhere so long as some of the body's members continue to systematically violate Syria's sovereignty, while their allies provide support to the terrorists the rest of the world is meant to be fighting.Last week, the UN Security Council unanimously adopted
Resolution 2254, endorsing the road map for the Syrian peace process, and setting a timetable for talks aimed at bringing the brutal, half-decade-long conflict to a close.
Despite being hailed as an important step toward peace, not everyone is optimistic over the resolution's significance.
The problem, according to Italian journalist Manlio Dunucci,
is that three of the Security Council's permanent members are engaged in the systematic violation of the country's sovereignty, while their allies provide direct support for the terrorists ripping Syria apart."Defusing the conflict in Syria would contribute to easing tensions throughout the Middle East, but there is a problem," Dunucci, a columnist for progressive Italian newspaper
il Manifesto,
explained.
"Among the Security Council's five permanent members, three - the US, France and Britain, have blatantly violated 'the sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity of the Syrian Arab Republic' [a line from the
draft text], despite voicing their 'strong support' for the resolution. They are the ones responsible for the 'increase in terrorists drawn to the fighting in Syria', despite simultaneously expressing their 'gravest concern' over the issue."
Comment: A psychopathic government will have no problem with saying one thing and doing another. Self-interest is the overriding guide. Any contradictions between words and actions only trouble those who are the victims of the duplicity.