Welcome to Sott.net
Fri, 15 Oct 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Bullseye

Trump says if Russia were G7 member then problems would be easier to solve

trump
US President Donald Trump said in an interview with Fox radio that the problems in the world would be easier to solve if Russia were a part of the G7. The return of Russia to the summits of the G7 format requires common sense, since half of the issues discussed at these meetings are connected with Russia.

The host asked the American leader what Russian President Vladimir Putin had done to gain his confidence and return to the club of the leading countries of the world.
"Well, he helped us with the oil industry, which is good for him, too, and we raised it and now we can save millions of jobs in Texas, North Dakota and other places in Oklahoma. Now the production there is stable. They (oil prices) fell to zero, which would have cost five million jobs. But in general it is not a question of what he did. "It's a matter of common sense," Trump said. - We have a G7, it is not there, and half of the questions are devoted to Russia. If he was there, it would be much easier to solve them. "

Hammer

The "Corona hoax", the proliferation of racial riots - and moving towards a military lockdown?

I can't breathe
The "leak"- this time from the German Ministry of the Interior - shows a "secret" 93-page document, admitting basically how badly Germany reacted to the corona hoax - no, the paper doesn't call it a "hoax", but you can taste it between the lines. In essence it says the economic and social collateral damage is much, but much larger than the impact of COVID-19- in terms of lives lost due to postponed treatment for cancer, heart and other life-threatening diseases, collapse of social infrastructure, despair, suicide, joblessness - no future in sight... for many the world just collapsed like a house of cards - no perspective nothing.

The paper also refers to other corona outbreaks from earlier years, and "regular" flu epidemics, which were much more serious than the 2020 one - the latter, COVID-19, denominated by WHO as a pandemic - under orders of the mighty behind the WEF -The World Economic Forum - the infamous Davos Club, to which also Bill Gates belongs, the vaccine tsar, who stated in a February 2010 Southern California TED Talk entitled "Innovating to Zero" -
"If we are doing are a real good job [vaccinating], we can reduce the world population by 10% to 15%" (see this).
Please, for your own sake and for that of your children and children's children, keep this always in mind, when you hear Bill Gates and vaccination. The one that we are all risking to be "forced" to get - is the one against COVID-19.

Would you trust Mr. Bill Gates - for any vaccine, actually for any health advice?

But, it gets better (or actually worse), he basically makes WHO's health policies as far as vaccination goes, literally wiping out (excluding) any other medically and scientifically proven preventive and curative measures.

Attention

America's revolution won't be televised

Minneapolis Rioters
© AFP / Chandan Khanna
People raise their hands and shout slogans as they protest at the makeshift memorial in honour of George Floyd on Tuesday in Minneapolis.
The Revolution Won't Be Televised because this is not a revolution. At least not yet.

Burning and/or looting Target or Macy's is a minor diversion. No one is aiming at the Pentagon (or even the shops at the Pentagon Mall). The FBI. The NY Federal Reserve. The Treasury Department. The CIA in Langley. Wall Street houses.

The real looters - the ruling class - are comfortably surveying the show on their massive 4K Bravias, sipping single malt.

This is a class war much more than a race war and should be approached as such. Yet it was hijacked from the start to unfold as a mere color revolution.

US corporate media dropped their breathless Planet Lockdown coverage like a ton of - pre-arranged? - bricks to breathlessly cover en masse the new American "revolution." Social distancing is not exactly conducive to a revolutionary spirit.

There's no question the US is mired in a convoluted civil war in progress, as serious as what happened after the assassination of Dr Martin Luther King in Memphis in April 1968.

Yet massive cognitive dissonance is the norm across the full "strategy of tension" spectrum. Powerful factions pull no punches to control the narrative. No one is able to fully identify all the shadowplay intricacies and inconsistencies.

Hardcore agendas mingle: an attempt at color revolution/regime change (blowback is a bitch) interacts with the Boogaloo Bois - arguably tactical allies of Black Lives Matter - while white supremacist "accelerationists" attempt to provoke a race war.

To quote the Temptations: it's a ball of confusion.

Antifa is criminalized but the Boogaloo Bois get a pass (here is how Antifa's main conceptualizer defends his ideas). Yet another tribal war, yet another - now domestic - color revolution under the sign of divide and rule, pitting Antifa anti-fascists vs. fascist white supremacists.

Meanwhile, the policy infrastructure necessary for enacting martial law has evolved as a bipartisan project.

We are in the middle of the proverbial, total fog of war. Those defending the US Army crushing "insurrectionists" in the streets advocate at the same time a swift ending to the American empire.

Amidst so much sound and fury signifying perplexity and paralysis, we may be reaching a supreme moment of historical irony, where US homeland (in)security is being boomerang-hit not only by one of the key artifacts of its own Deep State making - a color revolution - but by combined elements of a perfect blowback trifecta: Operation Phoenix; Operation Jakarta; and Operation Gladio.

But the targets this time won't be millions across the Global South. They will be American citizens.

Binoculars

Trump's distractions - or is the empire in retreat?

Venezuela protestor
Things continue to spiral out of control in the U.S. as the myth of policing fails and anti-civilizational forces move into the power vacuum.

And while I'm still completely committed to the end of the U.S. empire and its imperial edicts, It's also not lost on me what's happening, who's making it happen and how they are taking advantage of this.

I warned you President Trump's near atavistic pursuit of U.S. 'enemies' in places like Syria, Iraq, Iran and Venezuela would turn the world against us. Look at the protests for George Floyd across Europe and tell me things haven't changed.

The empire is the problem. It's a lesson Justin Raimondo taught me at Antiwar.com twenty years ago. And it's only now that that idea has reached any kind of critical mass.

Are we going to dismantle the empire in an orderly fashion or a chaotic one? The animals on the streets have cast their vote. What's yours?

And while Trump has made a hash of foreign policy in so many ways, I also told you that he was smart enough to only play the crazy Ivan role up the to point of actually starting a shooting war.

Comment: This last point is an important one. Regardless of how much the rioting in the US is being organized, pushed along and fomented (though it appears that a lot of it is being given a "helping hand"), it will be used politically - in whatever way shape or form possible - to attempt to oust Trump.

See also:


Blackbox

Can China's Silk Road survive Coronavirus?

China supply chain
China's priority infrastructure project, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), faces enormous problems just seven years after it was proclaimed in 2013. Serious problems and charges of China luring poorer nations into what a leading Indian analyst termed a "debt trap diplomacy," began to appear already in 2018 when Malaysia and Pakistan, under new governments demanded a renegotiation of terms with Beijing. Now the global economic impact of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, with the simultaneous collapse of economies from China to the USA, to the EU and across the developing world, are creating staggering new challenges for the China prized project.

When Xi Jinping first announced the ambitious China Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), then known as the Economic Silk Road in 2013, it was hailed as a much-needed boost to world infrastructure development which had the promise to lift hundreds of millions across Eurasia and beyond out of poverty. Many saw it as the effort to replicate the economic model that gave China the most extraordinary industrial growth of any nation in modern history.

Blue Planet

Trump says Russia will 'get things done' if back in the G7

Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump
© Sputnik / Mikhail Klimentyev
FILE PHOTO: Russia's President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump mmet at the G20 summit in Osaka, Japan, on June 28, 2019.
US President Donald Trump has dubbed Russia rejoining G7 "common sense" - but the move was met with resistance by some US allies. Trump insists it is better to talk with Moscow, instead of talking about it.

"Many of the things that we talk about are about [Russian President Vladimir] Putin," Trump told Fox News Radio. Having the Russian leader in the room during the G7 talks would "get things done," he added.

His statement came after the UK and Canada - two of America's closest allies, and fellow G7 members - voiced their opposition to the idea of having Russia onboard again. London, for example, demanded Moscow be barred from rejoining the group until it "ceases its aggressive and destabilizing activity."

Bad Guys

Senate opens probe on Trump-Russia investigation

Mueller investigation
Republican allies of President Donald Trump attacked the FBI's probe of his 2016 presidential campaign on Wednesday, but failed to get a key witness to agree that former U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation was unfounded.

At the opening hearing in a Republican-led Senate probe that Democrats called politically motivated, former U.S. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein defended his 2017 decision to appoint Mueller to investigate Russian election interference and numerous contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia.

"I still believe it was the right decision under the circumstances," Rosenstein told the Senate Judiciary Committee.

"All the charges that were filed were legitimate," he said when asked about cases filed against a half-dozen campaign officials and Trump associates.

Attention

Governments And WHO Changed Covid-19 Policy Based on Suspect Data From Tiny US Company


Comment: The outfit that somehow got the ears of the WHO and every major world nation, appears to have been a dodgy front operation for something else, and was used to destroy the credibility of hydroxychloroquine as an effective treatment for covid-19. In short, it seems someone with a lot of influence really wanted to prevent the widespread acceptance of an effective treatment for Covid-19 (looking at you, Big Pharma).

Dr. Mandeep Mehra, the lead co-author of the dodgy study, is a director at Brigham & Women's Hospital, which is credited with providing funding. Dr. Mehra and The Lancet failed to disclose that Brigham Hospital has a partnership with Gilead and is currently conducting TWO trials testing the drug Remdesivir, the prime competitor of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19, the focus of the study.


surgisphere hoax hydroxychloroquine

A tiny US company, Surgisphere, is behind flawed data which led to governments and the world to dismiss an effective treatment for Coronavirus
Surgisphere, whose employees appear to include a sci-fi writer and adult content model, provided database behind Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine hydroxychloroquine studies

The World Health Organization and a number of national governments have changed their Covid-19 policies and treatments on the basis of flawed data from a little-known US healthcare analytics company, also calling into question the integrity of key studies published in some of the world's most prestigious medical journals.

A Guardian investigation can reveal the US-based company Surgisphere, whose handful of employees appear to include a science fiction writer and an adult-content model, has provided data for multiple studies on Covid-19 co-authored by its chief executive, but has so far failed to adequately explain its data or methodology.

Data it claims to have legitimately obtained from more than a thousand hospitals worldwide formed the basis of scientific articles that have led to changes in Covid-19 treatment policies in Latin American countries. It was also behind a decision by the WHO and research institutes around the world to halt trials of the controversial drug hydroxychloroquine. On Wednesday, the WHO announced those trials would now resume.

Footprints

AG Barr personally gave the order to clear WH area of protesters

Trump, Barr, group
© The Federalist
President Donald Trump, AG Bill Barr and others in front of the White House.
Attorney General William Barr reportedly made the call to clear protesters near the White House before President Trump spoke Monday.

The Washington Post reported that Barr gave the direct order for law enforcement to push protesters away from the streets around Lafayette Square before Trump addressed the demonstrations from the Rose Garden.

Smoke canisters exploded and rubber bullets were fired during the dispersion, during which Barr was spotted on camera overseeing the law enforcement operation from behind security near the White House. After the crowds were cleared, the Secret Service maintained a clear path so that Trump could walk from the White House to the historic St. John's Episcopal Church, where he was photographed holding up a Bible, a move that was criticized by the bishop and by some lawmakers.

According to two law enforcement officials, a decision to extend the perimeter around Lafayette Square by one block was made late Sunday evening or early on Monday with the goal of enforcing it Monday afternoon. When Barr saw that the protest-free area had not been extended, he then demanded it.

Comment: Relentlessly, media's false claims continued:
These actions were further proof that Orange Man Bad is literally the worst, restoring rule of law is criminal, and standing in front of a church holding a Bible is an assault on the American conscience. They focused on how the Park Police had cleared the area ahead of the city-wide curfew declared by D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser.

United States Park Police acting Chief Gregory T. Monahan exploded the entire false narrative:
On Monday, June 1, the USPP worked with the United States Secret Service to have temporary fencing installed inside Lafayette Park. At approximately 6:33 pm, violent protestors on H Street NW began throwing projectiles including bricks, frozen water bottles and caustic liquids. The protestors also climbed onto a historic building at the north end of Lafayette Park that was destroyed by arson days prior. Intelligence had revealed calls for violence against the police, and officers found caches of glass bottles, baseball bats and metal poles hidden along the street.

To curtail the violence that was underway, the USPP, following established policy, issued three warnings over a loudspeaker to alert demonstrators on H Street to evacuate the area. Horse mounted patrol, Civil Disturbance Units and additional personnel were used to clear the area. As many of the protestors became more combative, continued to throw projectiles, and attempted to grab officers' weapons, officers then employed the use of smoke canisters and pepper balls. No tear gas was used by USPP officers or other assisting law enforcement partners to close the area at Lafayette Park. Subsequently, the fence was installed.
The false story spread internationally despite its lack of evidence. Here are just a few of the uncountable examples:

Reuters published a video it claimed showed U.S. Park Police using tear gas. The video did not show any such thing.

A Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times reporter tweeted out an NPR piece headlined "Park Police Tear Gas Peaceful Protesters To Clear Way For Trump Church Photo-Op."

PBS Yamiche Alcindor reported erroneously that she was "still processing that I saw peaceful protesters teargassed outside the White House so Pres Trump could walk to St. John's Episcopal Church."

The Washington Post ran an article falsely headlined, "Inside the push to tear-gas protesters ahead of a Trump photo op," authored by Ashley Parker, Josh Dawsey, and Rebecca Tan. Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson claimed Tan "was tear-gassed in reporting this story." Gender and family issues reporter Samantha Schmidt retweeted that claim, adding, "There were five of us Post reporters — all young women — near Lafayette Square when federal officers started spraying gas and rubber bullets."

The New York Times falsely headlined its article, "Tear Gas Clears Path for Trump to Visit Church."

Garrett Haake claimed, "Tear gas was definitely used, and park police can't 🤷🏼‍♂️that." Asked what made him sure about his claim, he cited his "experience. the burning sensation it caused in my lungs, & my retired marine security."

MSNBC falsely reported, "Trump Visits Church After Police Clear Protesters With Tear Gas."

ABC News' George Stephanopoulos reported the doubly false "Police use tear gas, push back peaceful protesters for Trump church visit."

The Washington Post's dramatic Philip Rucker falsely claimed in a tweet that "Military police fire tear gas at peaceful protesters to clear street in front of St. John's."

Peter Baker of the New York Times falsely reported on the security threats and how they were removed, saying, "police and troops have moved against peaceful protesters with tear gas and flash bangs." Here the New York Times falsely claimed the protesters were peaceful and that tear gas was used against them:

Brett LoGiurato, the senior editor of Wharton Press peddled the tear gas lie and instructed his political allies to censor the news:

Maggie Haberman of the New York Times also peddled the lies about tear gas and peaceful protesters.


NPR hit a trifecta by falsely reporting about tear gas, falsely reporting about peaceful protesting, and as a bonus downplaying the arson against the church:

And Trump's take on the incident went unheeded:
"They didn't use tear gas," Trump claimed, contradicting multiple media reports which appears to show a massive police contingent evicting protesters and journalists alike from the president's route just moments before his "surprise" walk to the church. "Now, when I went, I didn't say 'Oh, move them out.' I didn't know who was there," he added, insisting that he merely wanted to visit the church after it "went through trauma."

Defense Secretary Mark Esper, who accompanied the president, claims he did not even know they were heading for a photo op. "I thought I was going to do two things: to see some damage and to talk to the troops."

The church stunt drew anger from all sides, with critics accusing Trump of using the Bible as a political prop, and assaulting peaceful protesters so he could pose for photos.

The stunt even prompted disturbing comparisons online between Trump and Adolf Hitler, with people posting photos of the two holding a Bible in a similar fashion - only to find the picture of the Nazi leader was fake.


More than enough evidence and justification that MSM just copies each other to reinforce any message they choose, facts not necessary.

See also: CNN reporter lambasted online after finger-wagging at Trump and officials for no masks at church


Dominoes

NYC Mayor de Blasio's demarcation: Mass protests acceptable, religious observances are not

de Blasio
© Reuters
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio (D)
New York City mayor Bill de Blasio (D.) told a reporter for a Jewish newspaper that "400 years of American racism" justify his decision to permit mass protests but not prayer services.

"Four hundred years of American racism, I'm sorry, that is not the same question as the understandably aggrieved store owner or the devout religious person who wants to go back to services," de Blasio told Hamodia's Reuvain Borchardt.

Comment: In times of crisis some people take to the streets and some seek refuge for the soul. It is likely these two options need to be in balance - a fundamental disregard by de Blasio, whether consciously or not.