Puppet MastersS


Propaganda

Lapdog reporter asks Killary if ISIS or Russia were behind weekend bombings in NY to influence elections

clinton cnn
It's clear as day
Bloomberg Politics correspondent Jennifer Epstein is the bravest, most hard-hitting journalist since William Randolph Hearst; she's a fearless trailblazer who carves massive truth canyons into America's endless plains of bullshit and complacency. Watch her grill Hillary Clinton without remorse:
Are you concerned that this weekend's attack — or, potential incidents in the coming weeks — might be an attempt by ISIS, or ISIS sympathizers, or any other group, maybe Russian, um, to influence the presidential race in some way, and presumably to drive votes to Donald Trump [...]?
Experience this historic moment for yourself, compliments of CNN:


Comment: Here's the reality: the bombings in NY and NJ have taken the focus off of the actions in Syria, where the US military and its proxy terrorists bombed the Syrian military. When one asks in this situation, who benefits, the answer is the US government. Why in the world would Russia do something to benefit their so-called enemy? But the media is so entrenched in spreading propaganda that it can't see past its nose, so it automatically throws softball questions at politicians and calls it journalism.


Bulb

Zakharova to US Ambassador: "Take a trip to Syria to find out what 'embarrassed' means"

Zakharova Powers
© Sputnik / ReutersRussian Foreign Ministry's spokesperson Maria Zakharova and U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power
The Russian FM spokeswoman invited the US ambassador to the UN to visit Syria and see firsthand what "embarrassed" means. This comes after the UN ambassador lashed out at Moscow for hinting the US supports IS after coalition airstrikes hit the Syrian Army.

During a speech at an emergency UN Security Council meeting called by Russia to discuss the deadly airstrikes delivered by the US-led coalition, US Ambassador to the UN Samantha Power said that Moscow's representative should be"embarrassed" for her words suggesting that the strike indicated that Washington is defending Islamic State (IS, former ISIS, ISIL) terrorists.

According to the Russian Foreign Ministry, the strike near the eastern city of Deir ez-Zor that killed 62 Syrian soldiers bordered between "gross negligence" and "direct assistance" to IS.

In response to Power's accusations, Maria Zakharova wrote on Facebook: "Dear Samantha Power, in order to know the meaning of the word "embarrassed," I highly encourage you to travel to Syria and talk to the people there for yourself. And by that I do not mean the Al-Nusra Front militants, nor the moderate opposition, whose humanitarian situation Washington seems to be so worried about. I likewise am not referring to the Western warriors for justice for Syria. I'm referring to the actual people that continue to live there in spite of the bloody experiment that has been waged on their homeland for over six years, with active participation by Washington."

Comment: Related:


Bad Guys

The rise of American neofeudalism: The Courtiers and the Tyrants

Obama Clinton
© Carolyn Kaster / APPresident Barack Obama is joined by presidential nominee Hillary Clinton after he spoke at the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia in July.
Thomas Frank's marvelous scorched-earth assault on the Democratic Party and professional elites in his book "Listen, Liberal: Or, What Ever Happened to the Party of the People?" has one fatal flaw. Frank blames the liberal class, rather than the corporations that have seized control of the centers of power, for our descent into political dysfunction and neofeudalism.

Yes, self-identified liberals such as the Clintons and Barack Obama speak in the language of liberalism while selling out the poor, the working class and the middle class to global corporate interests. But they are not, at least according to the classical definition, liberals. They are neoliberals. They serve the dictates of neoliberalism—austerity, deindustrialization, anti-unionism, endless war and globalization—to empower and enrich themselves and the party. The actual liberal class—the segment of the Democratic Party that once acted as a safety valve to ameliorate through reform the grievances and injustices within our capitalist democracy and that had within its ranks politicians such as George McGovern, Gaylord Nelson, Warren Magnuson and Frank Church and New Deal Democrats such as Franklin D. Roosevelt—no longer exists. I spent 248 pages in my book "Death of the Liberal Class" explaining the orchestrated corporate campaign to erase the liberal class from the political landscape and, more ominously, destroy the radical labor and social movements that were the real engines of social and political reform in the 19th and 20th centuries.

The Democratic and the professional elites whom Frank excoriates are, as he points out, morally bankrupt, but they are only one piece of the fake democracy that characterizes our system of "inverted totalitarianism." The problem is not only liberals who are not liberal; it is also conservatives, once identified with small government, the rule of law and fiscal responsibility, who are not conservative. It is a court system that has abandoned justice and rather than defend constitutional rights has steadily stripped them from us through judicial fiat. It is a Congress that does not legislate but instead permits lobbyists and corporations to write legislation. It is a press, desperate for advertising dollars and often owned by large corporations, that does not practice journalism. It is academics, commentators and public intellectuals, often paid by corporate think tanks, who function as shameless cheerleaders for the neoliberal and imperial establishment and mock the concept of independent and critical thought.

The Democratic and the professional elites are an easy and often amusing target. One could see them, in another era, prancing at a masked ball at Versailles on the eve of the revolution. They are oblivious to how hated they have become. They do not understand that when they lambast Donald Trump as a disgrace or a bigot they swell his support because they, not Trump, are seen by many Americans as the enemy. But these courtiers did not create the system. They sold themselves to it. And if Americans do not understand how we got here we are never going to find our way out.


Comment: For further insight on how we got here, listen to our recent show: The Truth Perspective: Introducing Political Ponerology


Comment: The author outlines the symptoms, but doesn't quite get to the cause, the root of the problem. For more see:


Heart - Black

Unfolding calamity in Yemen: British support for Saudi atrocities in the war

Homes flattened by air strikes. Boys killed by discarded cluster bombs. Babies dying in incubators. This is Yemen in 2016. MEE sent Peter Oborne to survey the devastation

The humanitarian calamity in Yemen entered a terrifying new phase of horror this month as air strikes on the capital city of Sanaa started again after a five-month lull.

Planes from the Saudi-led coalition bombarded the city following the collapse of peace talks in Kuwait. The assaults are destroying civilian infrastructure, and threaten to prevent food and desperately needed aid from reaching the capital.

A young girl in Sadaa hospital
© Mohammed Al-Mikhlafi/MEEA young girl undergoes hospital treatment in Sadaa
Many of the attacks seem to have been indiscriminate. At least 16 people, all of them said to have been women and children, died when a potato crisp factory was struck.

The nearest military post was more than one kilometre away and a friend of the owner told us that there was no military activity on the site.

Saudi-led coalition air strikes also killed 10 people and destroyed a school in Haydan in the northern Saada province on 13 August, while an attack on a Doctors Without Borders (MSF) medical centre in Hajja left 19 dead and 24 wounded, prompting the charity to announce it was evacuating its staff from six hospitals in northern Yemen.

The coalition said it had set up an independent team to investigate incidents in which civilians are killed.

The strikes also targeted the Red Sea port of Hodeida and elsewhere across Yemen. Much of the country is already threatened with starvation.

The renewal of the air assault, and fresh evidence of the killing of civilians, will open Britain and the United States to fresh charges that they have been complicit in alleged Saudi war crimes and atrocities.

SOTT Logo S

SOTT Focus: SOTT News Snapshot: September 19 edition - First Syrians, now Afghans - Americans bomb Afghan police - while terror distracts America

rahami
© ABCNJ/NY bomb suspect Ahmad Khan Rahami, injured but alive after a shoot-out with police in New Jersey.
Just a day after bombing Syrian troops who were fighting Daesh, the Americans have bombed Afghan police who were fighting the Taliban. The officers were guarding a security checkpoint near Tarin Kot during the "double tap" (trademark held by the IDF) airstrikes. The first airstrike killed one officer, then when seven additional officers returned to the scene, they too were targeted and killed. Highway Police Commander Samunwal Rahimullah Khan told VOA, "we are unable to understand why Americans targeted our policemen."

The U.S. insists it was targeting "individuals" firing on Afghan National Defense and Security Forces. Perhaps the U.S. really is that incompetent. Or perhaps the U.S. really is that Machiavellian - staging a repeat of their "mistake" in Syria just in order to prove to the world that it really was an accident. Either way, the world should react by containing American idiocy and the destruction it causes, whether mistakenly or intentionally. Either way, people die needlessly.

Chess

US and Russia influence in Syria - warmongers versus peacemakers

Aleppo humanitarian aid
© George Ourfalian/Agence France-Presse
Aid has been blocked at the Turkish border, trying to reach the besieged city of Aleppo
Despite 10 months of negotiations between the US and Russia, the two biggest players in the Syrian conflict, the ceasefire is close to unravelling

At about 5pm on Saturday, two US F-16 fighter bombers and two A-10 specialised ground attack aircraft bombed what they believed was a concentration of Isis fighters besieging pro-government forces in the city of Deir Ezzor in eastern Syria.

Comment: Just like the 'mistaken' hospital bombings in Syria?

Whoever it was in the US Air Force who had misidentified the target as Isis made a disastrous error; the US planes were attacking Syrian Army soldiers fighting Isis at a position called Jebel Tharda close to Deir Ezzor airport. The city has been besieged by Isis for over a year and 110,000 civilians are trapped inside. By the time the US bombing raid was over it had killed at least 62 Syrian soldiers and injured another 100, enabling Isis to overrun the survivors before being forced to retreat by a counter-attack backed by Russian airstrikes.

Comment: The US has the most sophisticated monitoring and surveillance systems in the world. With ISIS conveniently poised to take advantage of the situation, it's bordering on impossible to believe the US didn't know exactly what they were doing. Question is, who gave the order?

Comment: It is not Russia's fault the agreement 'did not work'. Pay special attention from 8:40 on.




Bad Guys

Killary condemns weekend terror attacks, has a plan to defeat ISIS the same way she liberated Libya

Killary
Both candidates for the POTUS position spoke out against the terror attacks that hit America over the weekend.

An exhausted Hillary Clinton condemned what she characterized as "apparent terrorist attacks" in New York, New Jersey and Minnesota...
"This should steel our resolve to protect our country and defeat ISIS and other terrorist groups."

"I have laid out a comprehensive plan to do that."
We all know HRC's "comprehensive plan"...

A no-fly zone in Syria that would risk war with Russia and help give ISIS time to regroup and rearm.

Using ISIS and "moderate rebels" to overthrowing the internationally recognized, legitimate and secular government of Assad.

Comment: See also:
  • Are the multiple explosions and the crazed cop shooting markers of the engineered chaos to come?



Chess

It ain't over till we say it's over - Kerry's ceasefire

Damaged buildings
© REUTERS/Bassam KhabiehChildren walk near damaged buildings in rebel-held Ain Tarma, eastern Damascus suburb of Ghouta, Syria September 17, 2016. Picture taken September 17, 2016
Syria's military declared a week-long ceasefire over on Monday and air raids were reported in Aleppo, even as officials from the United States and Russia met behind closed doors in Geneva to try to extend the truce.

Syrian or Russian warplanes bombed rebel-held areas in the city of Aleppo and nearby villages, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said, reporting a number of dead and injured.

The monitoring group said it was not clear if the jets were Syrian or Russian. Moscow supports President Bashar al-Assad with its air force.

The raids came as what is likely to be the final attempt by the U.S. administration of President Barack Obama to find a negotiated solution to the five year old civil war appeared close to collapse.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said it was too early to call the ceasefire finished, and the United Nations said that only Washington and Moscow could declare it over, as they were the ones who had originally agreed it.

Comment: See also: Update: US calls on Assad to respect truce after US airstrikes on Syrian Army
Less than 24 hours after the U.S. Airforce mistakenly struck Syrian Arab Army (SAA) positions in Deir Ezzor, killing over 80 soldiers, US Secretary of State John Kerry told the BBC that Russia needs to be more serious about getting the Syrian government to abide by the terms of the ceasefire.

Six days after the start of a fragile truce, air strikes are reported to have targeted anti-government groups in Aleppo.

During an interview with the BBC, Mr Kerry was asked to what extent the US military would be responsible if the ceasefire did not hold.




Dominoes

Parliament committee shreds warmonger Cameron, Libya is Cameron's Iraq

cameron
Former UK Prime Minister David Cameron is consistent in just one thing - jumping ship when the going gets tough. He announced his resignation in the immediate wake of the 23rd July referendum in which Britain marginally voted to leave the EU, a referendum which he had fecklessly called to appease right wing "little Englanders", instead of facing them down.

He lost. The result is looming financial catastrophe and the prospect of unraveling forty three years of legislations (Britain joined the then European Economic Community on 1st January 1973.) No structure was put in place for a government Department to address the legal and bureaucratic enormities should the leave vote prevail. There is still none.

Cameron however committed to staying on as an MP until the 2020 general election, vowing grandiosely: "I will do everything I can in future to help this great country succeed", he said of the small island off Europe which he had potentially sunk, now isolated from and derided by swathes of its continental neighbours - with the sound of trading doors metaphorically slamming shut reverberating across the English Channel.

David Cameron has now jumped again, resigning unexpectedly and immediately as an MP on Monday 12th September, giving the impression that he was not in agreement with certain policies of his (unelected) successor, Theresa May. He stated: "Obviously I have my own views about certain issues ... As a former PM it's very difficult to sit as a back-bencher and not be an enormous diversion and distraction from what the Government is doing. I don't want to be that distraction." What an ego.

Over the decades of course, the House of Parliament has been littered with former Prime Ministers and Deputy Prime Ministers who have remained constituency MPs without being a "distraction."

Info

Nigeria's Boko Haram: A quest for dominance or simply terrorism on steroids?

Boko Haram graphic
The scourge of Boko Haram is a well-known disaster to the Nigerian state, but one aspect that has not been looked at by the international community is the issue of the identity crisis of minorities and the domineering attitude of the majority. To the average outside viewer the Nigerian State is a multi-ethnic, multicultural with two main religious groups i.e., Christianity and Islam, they even go ahead to say, especially the media and corporations of the developed nations, that there is the Muslim north and the Christian south. This is admissible in statistics and in less informed conversations, but on the ground it's far more complex than that, thus to really and truly understand BH, an attempt must be made to understand Nigerian history, not the ones in kindergarten history books, and those on the lips of politicians, but that closed, labyrinth of horrendous, sinister and complex interconnected events from pre-colonial, colonial and post-colonial periods and the present state of the Nigerian state which characterized Nigeria's regions and its people.

Over the last decade or so, the Islamist group Boko Haram has been responsible for a wide range of horrible and unspeakable violence, thousands of deaths, and the displacement of one million people in Northern Nigeria and surrounding areas. The roots of that agenda stretch back several centuries to pre-colonial Nigeria. The chronology of events from the Borno empire, then the Sokoto caliphate (Usman Dan Fodio jihads), colonial Nigeria, and finally "independent" Nigeria.