Puppet MastersS


Arrow Down

United States media has proven itself to be a lowly bunch of terrorist sympathizers

daily beast
The Syrian government—a dictatorship known for imprisoning, torturing and disappearing dissidents—is easy to vilify. And over the last five years of Syria's civil war, it has committed its share of atrocities. But there is more than one side to every story, and US media coverage has mainly reflected one side—that of the rebels—without regard for accuracy or basic context.


Comment: It is in this same light that the Western claims of Assad's 'atrocities' should be viewed. As reviewed below, those making such assertions are also those who sympathize with terrorists, cheer them on, and use them as sources. Thus, the US media claims have no credibility.


As the Syrian government recaptured East Aleppo from rebels in recent weeks, media outlets from across the political spectrum became rebel mouthpieces, unquestioningly relaying rebel claims while omitting crucial details about who the rebels were.

Almost always overlooked in the US (and UK) media narrative is the fact that the rebels in East Aleppo were a patchwork of Western- and Gulf-backed jihadist groups dominated by Jabhat Fateh al-Sham (formerly Jabhat al-Nusra)—Al Qaeda's affiliate in Syria—along with its ally, Ahrar al-Sham (Daily Beast, 8/8/16; Foreign Policy, 9/1/16). These groups are explicitly anti-democratic and have been implicated in human rights violations, from mass execution and child beheadings to using caged religious minorities as human shields.

In the absence of any desire to evoke a political response, US media would surely have identified East Aleppo's rebels by the name of the most famous militant group in the world—Al Qaeda. Yet press reports regularly referred to the militant forces dominating East Aleppo simply as "rebels."

Attention

RT stars in ODNI report on 'Russian activities and intentions' in US presidential election

Trump supporter waits outside of the rally
© Andrew Kelly / Reuters
The US intelligence community has released the unclassified findings of its investigation into what it says was Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election, hours after President-elect Donald Trump received a briefing on the probe.


The ODNI devoted seven pages to RT and its influence on the election "by serving as a platform for Kremlin messaging to Russian and international audiences." The report claimed "Russian media made increasingly favorable comments about President-elect Trump as the 2016 US general and primary election campaigns progressed while consistently offering negative coverage of Secretary Clinton."

RT's pro-Trump campaign began in March 2016, according to the ODNI, by "consistently" casting Trump "as the target of unfair coverage from traditional US media outlets" that were "subservient to a corrupt political establishment."


Comment: RT just balanced out the US mainstream media's bias towards Clinton:

Media Research Center analysts found 184 opinionated statements about Hillary Clinton, split between 39 positive statements (21%) vs. 145 negative (79%). Those same broadcasts included more than three times as many opinionated statements about Trump, 91 percent of which (623) were negative vs. just nine percent positive (63).


Comment: Also read: New "Russian hacking" intel report: Still no evidence


Info

Andrew Korybko's 2017 Forecast: ASEAN & East Asia

east asia map
Summary


The US' original plans for the Pivot to Asia have largely been reversed in favor of China, though Washington still has a few tricks up its sleeve through Hybrid War and the "Lead From Behind" stratagem in making up for its recent setbacks.

The Pivot To Asia Reversal

Lost amidst the headline-grabbing news of the year over Syria, Brexit, and Trump, most international observers have failed to notice how the US' Pivot to Asia has experienced a series of staggering reversals which play to the ultimate benefit of China. The most profound of these has undoubtedly been the election of Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, which the author forecast right before it happened. This firebrand politician is a fierce patriot of Philippine interests and completely understands how disadvantageous his country's neo-colonial relationship with the US has been for Manila, which explains why he confidently began a series of steps designed to break this arrangement and free his country from Washington's indirect rule.

Comment: Further reading:


Dollar

Iran capitalizes on OPEC oil cut to sell millions of stored floating barrels - sources

gas flare on an oil production platform in the Soroush oil fields is seen alongside an Iranian flag
© REUTERS/Raheb Homavandi/File Photo
Iran has sold more than 13 million barrels of oil that it had long held on tankers at sea, capitalizing on an OPEC output cut deal from which it is exempted to regain market share and court new buyers, according to industry sources and data.

In the past three months, Tehran has sold almost half the oil it had held in floating storage, which had tied up many of its tankers as it struggled to offload stocks in an oversupplied global market.

The amount of Iranian oil held at sea has dropped to 16.4 million barrels, from 29.6 million barrels at the beginning of October, according to Thomson Reuters Oil Flows data. Before that sharp drop, the level had barely changed in 2016; it was 29.7 million barrels at the start of last year, the data showed.

Briefcase

Meeting with intel officials 'constructive,' according to Trump - hacking had 'absolutely no effect' on election

Trump
© Shannon Stapleton / Reuters
Hacking "had absolutely no effect" on the outcome of the 2016 US presidential elections, President-elect Donald Trump has announced following a meeting with intelligence officials.

Having described his meeting with top representatives of the US intelligence community as "constructive," Trump said on Friday that no cyber hacking from Russia, China or any other country had affected the vote.

"While Russia, China, other countries, outside groups and people are consistently trying to break through the cyber infrastructure of our governmental institutions, businesses and organizations including the Democrat National Committee, there was absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election," Trump said in his statement.

"There was no tampering whatsoever with voting machines," he added.

The Republican president-elect claimed that there had been "attempts to hack the Republican National Committee (RNC)." However, thanks to the Comittee's "strong hacking defenses," they all failed, he said.

USA

Priceless! US Military gave Obama embarrassing send off

Obama military finale
© MSNBCObama's military farewell
Barack Obama despite the mainstream media and liberals' claims that he was a great Commander-in-Chief, the very people that served under him for eight years just proved that their claims were wrong.

Who better to give a rating of how poor Obama has been as Commander-in-Chief than the very men and women that have had to put their lives on the line for our country under the control of Obama?

Well during a ceremony earlier today at Joint Base Myer in Arlington, Virginia Barack Obama was given the Department of Defense Medal of Distinguished Public Service, the best part comes when you look at the "enormous" crowd that came out to see the event. Rows and rows of empty seats were there to greet Obama and there couldn't be a more fitting send off for the lame duck president.

Barack Obama not only had some of the worst foreign policy our country has ever seen, the non-legally binding Iran deal that the Democrats hailed as the best thing since Christmas, sorry "holidays" that doesn't actually mean anything in reality.

The brave men and women that protect our country from threats and terror don't support their Commander-in-Chief and there are hardly any greater insults than that!

Our military just let Obama know what they really thought of him.

Share this everywhere to show how "popular" Obama really is!


Comment: A fitting un-response.


Brick Wall

Austria: Defense minister considers 'protective zones' to eliminate illegal migrants in EU

Hans Peter Doskozil'
© Nachrichten.atAustrian Defense Minister Hans Peter Doskozil
Austria has proposed tough new anti-migrant measures, with its Defense Minister calling for a pan-European cap on migration, external application centers for refugees and "protective zones" to hold and deport illegals from the EU.

The first step of Hans Peter Doskozil's plan to fix migration problems in the EU involves establishing limiting migration numbers and "effective protection of the EU's external borders," Germany's Bild newspaper reported on Thursday. "It's about ending the failed European asylum policies. We must admit to ourselves and be honest that the EU has limited capacity to absorb more migrants. We must stop illegal immigration," Bild quoted Doskozil as saying.

The total EU migration ceiling would be based on limits evaluated by the member states, thus forcing countries like Germany which do not have a limit to establish one. Doskozil has been a vocal critic of German Chancellor Angela Merkel's "open-door" policy since the beginning of the refugee crisis. "We must completely rethink the asylum system. The implementation of a united EU asylum system is necessary to deal with the crisis," the minister said.

"There should be only an orderly system of legal entry for asylum-seekers. Asylum applications should only be possible outside the EU in the future," the minister said, adding that migrants who had been denied asylum should be repatriated.

The minister's plan also entails the creation of asylum centers in "third countries, such as Niger, Jordan, Uzbekistan," where specially trained admission officers from EU countries would determine whether an applicant was eligible for asylum or not. Doskozil considers using the existing facilities of The UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) for such asylum application centers.


Comment: It is unlikely humanity will ever achieve one unifying standard or one unifying process. Considering all perspectives and solutions, Doskozil's plan may have some practicality and humanitarian merit. Whether it works, or is allowed to work, remains to be seen.


Star of David

Jordanian warning: Trump's US Embassy move to Jerusalem, a 'gift to extremists'

US embassy
© Nur Elias/ReutersUS embassy Tel Aviv
Moving the US Embassy in Israel to contested Jerusalem will inflame "the Islamic and Arab streets," and will serve as a gift to extremists, warned a top official from Jordan, one of Washington's closest allies in the volatile region. The unambiguous warning was voiced by Mohammed Momani, the Jordanian information minister, in response to US President-elect Donald Trump's statements on the issue, AP reported on Thursday.

The US Embassy move would be a "red line" for Jordan, and would "inflame the Islamic and Arab streets," Momani said, adding that it would also serve as a "gift to extremists." The controversial plan "will have catastrophic implications on several levels, including the regional situation," the top official told AP.

There have been a number of signs over the past few weeks which suggest that the relocation of the embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem is likely to happen. Trump's senior adviser Kellyanne Conway said in December that the embassy move was "a very big priority" for the president-elect. Israeli officials, including Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat, said they have been contacted about finding an appropriate location for the embassy in the city. Washington already has a building in the Arnona neighborhood, originally slated to accommodate the eventual US Embassy.

Trump has made several statements signaling a fresh start for the special relationship between the two nations.

The incoming administration has already nominated David Friedman, a prominent attorney who advised Trump on Israel during the presidential campaign, to be the next US ambassador to Israel. Friedman, who once was a columnist in several right-wing media outlets, said he wants to "strengthen the unbreakable bond between our two countries and advance the cause of peace within the region."


Comment: If it is so unbreakable, why would it need strengthening?


Comment: Maybe Trump will learn a bit more about what is really involved in international decisions that seem to be relatively low on the trigger list, but capable of sparking a regional conflagration. He might do well to also get up to speed with Israeli tactics of manipulation and persuasion.

See also:


Newspaper

Name one vastly more reliable source than the elite US media...Assange

Assange
© CNN.comJulian Assange
In January 2011, the people of Tunisia effectuated an uprising which led to the ouster of Ben Ali, who had ruled the country for 23 years. Many Tunisians were well aware that the regime was autocratic and corrupt, but they were provided additional gory details about its decadent opulence by none other than WikiLeaks, the organization whose founder and editor is currently being slimed by self-important U.S. liberals. In the aftermath of the revolution, WikiLeaks was widely hailed for its role in supplying previously-concealed information to Tunisian dissidents, and with that Assange cemented for himself a place in the pantheon of great journalistic trailblazers.

Can any sneering anti-Assange journalist point to a report, publication, investigation, or tweet of their own which has resulted in anything of remotely comparable magnitude? I'm guessing not. These people get on their high horse and deride WikiLeaks as some kind of compromised Russian front in the tank for Trump — but compared to Assange's record, they're little more than a speck of sludge on the bottom of a tin can.

Here is a handy list compiled by G. Greenwald in December 2010 memorializing a (non-exhaustive) list of what WikiLeaks revealed in that year alone. And for those with short memories, here's a (non-exhaustive) list of the 2016 campaign-related revelations that U.S. voters would have been deprived of but for WikiLeaks: Go here

And for those with short memories, here's a (non-exhaustive) list of the 2016 campaign-related revelations that U.S. voters would have been deprived of but for WikiLeaks: Go here

Notwithstanding his long, undeniable record of publishing massively consequential revelations, it's once again fashionable in certain Serious Media circles to bash Assange and his broader enterprise. While it's true that many of the same types were very annoyed with WikiLeaks when it came on the scene in 2010, today they have extra incentive to signal their distaste given that Assange is now seen to be in cahoots with Trump/Putin.


Comment: It is this kind of warped thinking that has gotten the MSM into such a sorry state where influence means more than truth.


Comment: See also:


Dollars

EU dished out £4.2B to most corrupt regimes over a fortnight

UK umbrella
© Agence France-Presse/Getty Images
Eurocrats splashed out the jaw-dropping sum of money on programmes including combatting racism against migrants, bankrolling Government reforms and, perhaps most incredibly of all, directly financing national budgets. They authorised 15 bank-busting payments to 29 countries in the space of just 15 days in December, embarking on a staggering splurge at a time when voters in Europe are suffering under crushing austerity regimes. Astonishingly just five of those countries are ranked in the top half of nations in terms of institutional corruption, with most of them judged to be in the worst 50 globally.

The figures, uncovered by the pro-Brexit Facts4EU.Org news site, show that British taxpayers will be stung for an eye-watering £462,000,000 to pay for the projects, and could be required to carry on funding them even after the country has left the EU in spring 2019. Critics today blasted the payments, saying the EU has "no right" to blow hard working families' money abroad and adding: "At Christmas we should remember charity starts at home."

Earlier this month, Brussels agreed to hand over an jaw-dropping £1billion to the African nations of Ethiopia, Niger, Mali, Nigeria and Senegal, which between them register an average ranking of 99 out of the 168 nations included in Transparency's 2015 corruption index. The cash will predominantly be used to bankroll educational projects and boost economic growth in a desperate attempt by eurocrats to dissuade a second massive wave of African migrants from heading to Europe and overwhelming struggling member states.

Comment: Is this a grand plan to bankrupt the EU before the UK exit under the guise of beneficence? Corruption is not exclusive to these recipient countries. Putting an altruistic label on a "funding" only disguises and makes palatable whatever the true purpose of the "donation."