Puppet MastersS

X

30 Tory MPs plot the ousting of Theresa May 'sooner rather than later'

Theresa May
© The Independent
Tory rebel ringleader and former party chairman Grant Shapps says Prime Minister Theresa May must step down, claiming up to 30 MPs from across the party want May to fall on her sword "sooner rather than later."

Pressure is mounting on May to resign after a "disastrous" party conference speech that saw her handed a spoof P45, suffer from an incessant coughing fit, and the set falling down behind her.

Shapps, who served as Tory party chairman for three years, says a "growing number" of MPs, including five former cabinet ministers, want May to step down. Although some cabinet ministers agree with him, he says they are reluctant to back him because they are on the "payroll."


Comment: The tide to oust May is picking up momentum. Boris Johnson's 'bum smacking' for undermining her is a close second.

According to Breitbart:
In addition to these unexpected embarrassments [referring to her recent problematic speech], the prime minister also had the pre-planned contrition of having to apologise for her poor performance in the recent general election. She said of her poor performance that the election had been "too scripted, too presidential... I hold my hands up for that. I take responsibility. I led the campaign and I am sorry."
For details of her recent speech fiasco, see also: "Limping into oblivion", Theresa May could be gone by Christmas


Briefcase

The infamous 'Trump dossier' on Russia links now included in special counsel probe

James Comey
© Breitbart
The special counsel investigating whether Russia tried to sway the 2016 U.S. election has taken over FBI inquiries into a former British spy's dossier of allegations of Russian financial and personal links to President Donald Trump's campaign and associates, sources familiar with the inquiry told Reuters.

A report compiled by former MI6 officer Christopher Steele identified Russian businessmen and others whom U.S. intelligence analysts have concluded are Russian intelligence officers or working on behalf of the Russian government. A spokesman for special counsel Robert Mueller declined comment. The FBI also declined comment.

Three sources with knowledge of Mueller's probe said his investigators have assumed control of multiple inquiries into allegations by U.S. intelligence agencies that Russia interfered in the election to benefit Trump, a Republican. Russia has repeatedly denied any meddling in the election.

Two officials familiar with the investigations said that both Mueller's team and the Senate Intelligence Committee are seeking any evidence that former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort or others who had financial dealings with Russia might have helped Kremlin intelligence agencies target email hacking and social media postings undermining Trump's election opponent, Democrat Hillary Clinton.

On Wednesday, the Senate panel's chairman Richard Burr told reporters that the issue of whether Trump's campaign colluded with Russia remains an open question. "We have not come to any determination on collusion," Burr said.

Comment: No stone thrown is to be left unturned.

See also:


Arrow Up

In the Middle East all roads lead to Moscow

Putin meeting Saudi Arabia Middle East
© PPIOThe visit of the Saudi monarch to Moscow all but cements Putin as the central figure in Middle Eastern politics


The Saudi monarch is in Moscow, as Iranian and Turkish leaders meet in Tehran


As US media continues to speculate on the motives behind the tragic mass shooting in Las Vegas and the press in the UK critique Prime Minister Theresa May's latest policy speech, there have been significant changes in Middle Eastern alliances.

On Friday, Saudi Arabia's King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud arrived in Moscow to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in what some media posited as a visit to strengthen energy ties, particularly in the face of persistently low oil prices.

While it is true that the Russians and the Saudis - once at stark odds over oil and gas markets - have in the past three years coordinated on OPEC-plus agreements to cut output to boost prices, the two countries have much more at geopolitical stake in the Middle East.

Ambulance

U.S. visitors to Cuba complain of symptoms similar to embassy "attack"

An exterior view of the U.S. Embassy is seen in Havana, Cuba
© Alexandre Meneghini / ReutersAn exterior view of the U.S. Embassy is seen in Havana, Cuba.
A "handful" of private U.S. citizens who traveled to Cuba say they have experienced symptoms similar to those suffered by American diplomats in mysterious health "attacks" in Havana, the U.S. State Department said on Friday.

A State Department spokesperson, who declined to be named, said the agency could not verify the claims but said travelers should heed its travel warning issued last Friday.

The warning urged Americans to stay away from Cuba because of unexplained health "attacks" it says have caused hearing loss, dizziness, fatigue and cognitive issues among at least 22 diplomatic personnel.

The Trump administration on Tuesday expelled 15 Cuban diplomats to protest Cuba's failure to protect staff at the U.S. embassy in the communist country, just days after Washington recalled more than half the U.S. diplomatic personnel from Havana.

Cuba has denied involvement, and Washington has not directly blamed the government in Havana. So far, no probes have yielded any answers about how the alleged attacks were carried out or who was responsible.

Comment: This already strange story gets a little bit stranger. Question: who is interested in doing further damage to U.S.-Cuba relations?


Star of David

Stephen Walt in Forward: History has proved us right about the Israel Lobby

AIPAC conference
AIPAC conference
Ten years ago, John Mearsheimer and I published a controversial article and subsequent book examining the impact of the "Israel lobby" - that is, a loose coalition of pro-Israel individuals and organizations like the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the Anti-Defamation League, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and Christians United for Israel, just to name a few. We argued that decades of unconditional U.S. support for Israel - the so-called "special relationship" - is not explained by U.S. strategic interests or by shared values, as is often claimed, but is due primarily to the political efforts and activities of the lobby.

The result, we also argued, does more harm than good to both the United States and Israel. For the United States, the "special relationship" undermines America's standing in the Arab and Islamic worlds, has encouraged a more confrontational approach with Iran and Syria, and contributes significantly both to America's terrorism problem and to needless and costly debacles like the 2003 invasion of Iraq. For Israel, unquestioning U.S. support for almost all its actions has allowed the decades-long subjugation of the Palestinians to continue unchecked, undermining the Israeli-Palestinian peace process and threatening Israel's future as a democratic and/or Jewish state.

We made it clear that the lobby was not a monolith controlling every aspect of U.S. Middle East policy, but rather a collection of disparate groups and individuals united by the aim of defending Israel's actions and deepening the special relationship. We explicitly rejected the idea that anything nefarious was going on, explaining that AIPAC and related organizations were simply part of a powerful interest group like the farm lobby or the National Rifle Association. Their efforts to influence U.S. policy are "as American as apple pie." And we used the term "Israel lobby" to highlight that not all American Jews support these policies and that some key members of the lobby (such as Christian Zionists) aren't Jewish. The book also emphasizes that none of these groups or individuals is solely responsible for the choices U.S. leaders make.

Comment: A further sign that AIPAC's thought control is waning: Forward finally published Walt! For more on this shift, and what has prompted it, see Robert Fantina's new book: Essays on Palestine.


Blackbox

More stirring the pot? Axios says "insiders" pushing to replace Tillerson with Pompeo

pompeo
© Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
A report published by Axios on Friday cites unspecified sources who say President Donald Trump is considering current CIA Director Mike Pompeo as a replacement for Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, whose relationship with Trump is said to be "broken beyond repair."

According to the "insiders" who spoke to Axios, the last straw for President Trump was that Tillerson did not do enough to push back against the report on Wednesday that Tillerson called the president a "moron" after a Pentagon meeting in July. It was widely noted that while Tillerson organized a hasty press conference to deny that he had to be talked out of resigning his post, he did not actually deny calling Trump a moron. State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert did issue such a blanket denial several hours after Tillerson's presser.

Axios describes Trump as furious over the amount of coverage the "moron" story has received, eclipsing coverage of the president's trip to Las Vegas. The institutional relationship has soured as well, leaving White House with "zero trust" in the State Department.

Pompeo has been suggested as a replacement because he has an excellent personal relationship with President Trump and already works with him extensively on the President's Daily Brief, so he could help rebuild that trust.

Comment: Pompeo as Secretary of State? Please, no. Haley? Please God no! That said, notice that the above report, like all others of its kind, is based on nothing but alleged inside sources. Aside from some typical Washington play-acting, Tillerson has actually been one of the saner and more successfully diplomatic members of the Trump cabinet. First Flynn, then Bannon, now Tillerson? Or is this simply more rumor-mongering designed to show Trump's cabinet as unstable and riven by infighting?


Radar

US warship Reagan approaches Korean Peninsula for drills with South Korea

The aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan stations, during a port visit in Hong Kong, China October 2, 2017
© Bobby Yip / Reuters
The USS Ronald Reagan aircraft carrier along with a guided-missile cruiser and a nuclear-powered submarine are on their way to the Korean Peninsula to prepare for a potential war with North Korea, while Pyongyang reportedly plans new missiles tests.

As of Friday afternoon, the USS Ronald Reagan, with nearly 80 aircraft on board, was in the South China Sea on its way to the shores of US ally South Korea.

The two allies will conduct joint drills to detect, track, and intercept ballistic missiles, in addition to anti-submarine warfare training, Yonhap News agency reported, citing an unnamed South Korean official.

The official said the military exercises will likely be held around October 20.

MIB

'Security not paid in euro': German security chiefs reject joining pan-European intelligence service

BND logo
© Hannibal Hanschke / Reuters
The heads of the German foreign intelligence and domestic security services have criticized the idea of establishing a joint intelligence structure at the EU level and instead asked for more powers for their agencies.

The security chiefs unanimously renounced the idea of creating a pan-European security service that would exert control over the similar national structures by saying that would only lower the efficiency of their work and in fact impede effective cooperation between the European countries.

The heads of the German security services answered the questions of the German parliament's committee monitoring their activities during the first open hearing on October 5.

Bruno Kahl, president of Germany's foreign intelligence agency, the BND, said that the intelligence work is better organized at "the national level" and any "additional" institution in this field operating at the European level is just redundant.

Wolf

Sex crackpot, liberal left Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein's close connection to the Obamas and Clintons

clinton weinstein
Former president Bill Clinton and Harvey Weinstein
Hollywood producer and liberal left hero Harvey Weinstein has become toxic as a New York Times expose detailed decades of sexual harassment of aspiring actresses. Big surprise, who would have thought that liberal left Hollywood elites are complete hypocrites.

One power couple Weinstein was particularly found of was the Clintons. We can see why Weinstein and Bill Clinton would get along. The conversations they must have had.

Weinstein was one of Hillary Clinton's biggest donors, having raised millions for the pathetic loser Democratic presidential candidate.

Hillary Clinton has yet to disavow Weinstein's actions or return his large financial contributions made to the Clinton campaign.

Comment: Weinstein visited the Obama White House 13 times, nine of which were visits with Obama himself: "Other visits were with high-level staffers Valerie Jarrett, Michelle Obama's aide Melissa Winter, and Jeremy Weinstein, who served on the National Security Council between 2009 and 2011."

Democrats on the receiving end of Weinstein's donations are being urged to return the "dirty" money:
At least three Democrats have already said they will donate money they received from Weinstein to charitable causes.

A representative for Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) said in an email Friday that Blumenthal would donate his contribution from Weinstein to the Connecticut Alliance to End Sexual Violence. Weinstein contributed $5,400 to Blumenthal in October of last year, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Meanwhile, the campaign manager for Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) told CNN that the $5,600 Leahy received from Weinstein in campaign contributions would be donated to the Women's Fund at the Vermont Community Foundation, while a representative for Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-NM) told the outlet his $5,400 contribution would be donated to the non-profit Community Against Violence in New Mexico.
...
"During three-decades worth of sexual harassment allegations, Harvey Weinstein lined the pockets of Democrats to the tune of three quarters of a million dollars," RNC chairwoman Ronna Romney-McDaniel said in a statement. "If Democrats and the DNC truly stand up for women like they say they do, then returning this dirty money should be a no brainer."
The late-night hosts who couldn't get enough of the allegations against Trump and Bill O'Reilly were noticeably silent about the Weinstein scandal. Imagine that.
Jimmy Kimmel, Jimmy Fallon, Seth Meyers, James Corden, and Stephen Colbert all seemingly passed on the Weinstein news, both in their monologues and interviews with movie-star guests.

...now that Weinstein's sordid practices are out in the open, people are coming out of the woodwork to refer to the allegations as one of the "worst kept secrets" in the industry. Many people apparently knew full well that he was a creep, and that treated women this way, for decades. Yet he was feted, awarded, and applauded in those same glamorous cliques because he could make and break careers.
As the Washington Examiner asks, if Weinstein's secret was so well known, how many democrats knew and took his money anyway?
Actress Lena Dunham referred to a "flimsy but firm veil of secrecy." In The Cut, journalist Rebecca Traister wrote, "I have been having conversations about Harvey Weinstein's history of sexual harassment for more than 17 years." Axios ran an article headlined, "Harvey Weinstein was Hollywood's biggest open secret." CNN anchor Jake Tapper reported that a Hollywood producer told him, "Shocked it's taken so long for a Harvey Weinstein behavior expose. One of the most open secrets in Hollywood."
...
Weinstein's trail of political donations is long and his contributions benefitted many prominent Democrats. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, those lawmakers include: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., Al Franken, D-Minn., Richard Bluementhal, D-Conn., Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., Cory Booker, D-N.J., and Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.

It also includes former Sens. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., Russ Feingold, D-Wis., Chris Dodd, D-Conn., Harry Reid, D-Nev., Tom Daschle, D-S.D., former Gov. Howard Dean, D-Vt., former Secretary of State John Kerry, and former President Bill Clinton.

Don't forget the hundreds of thousands of dollars Weinstein donated to the DNC, DSCC, and DCCC as well.

Given that his behavior was apparently an "open secret" in Hollywood, it's worth questioning how it's possible that none of those Democrats, who claim to be staunch supporters of women's rights, were aware of Weinstein's reputation. Hollywood and Washington are separate worlds, but politicians, and especially Democrats, travel in circles that include plenty of powerful people from the entertainment industry. It's difficult to imagine high-profile Democrats such as the Clintons, Obamas, Franken, and Schumer were ignorant of the rumblings about Weinstein's conduct towards women.
An excerpt from the article by Rebecca Traister in The Cut referenced above:
The conversations started when I was a young editorial assistant at Talk, the magazine he financed, in 1999; back then it was with young people, friends - women and men - who worked for him, at Miramax, and told tales of hotel rooms, nudity, suggestion, and coercion, and then of whispered payoffs, former assistants who seemingly dropped off the face of the Earth. ...

In my mid-20s, I became a reporter and fact checker at the New York Observer, and part of my beat was covering the film business in New York. The night before the 2000 election, I was working on a story - perhaps my first seriously reported story - about O, the violent reimagining of Othello that Miramax's Dimension division was then sitting on, perhaps out of deference to the cringey clean-media message of the Al Gore-Joe Lieberman campaign, which Weinstein was publicly supporting; already there was talk of Weinstein's ambitions in Democratic politics. After Weinstein failed to respond to my calls for comment, I was sent, on Election Eve 2000, to cover a book party he was hosting, along with my colleague Andrew Goldman. Weinstein didn't like my question about O, there was an altercation; though the recording has alas been lost to time, I recall that he called me a cunt and declared that he was glad he was the "fucking sheriff of this fucking lawless piece-of-shit town." When my colleague Andrew (who was also then my boyfriend) intervened, first calming him down and then trying to extract an apology, Weinstein went nuclear, pushing Andrew down a set of steps inside the Tribeca Grand - knocking him over with such force that his tape recorder hit a woman, who suffered long-term injury - and dragging Andrew, in a headlock, onto Sixth Avenue.

Such was the power of Harvey Weinstein in 2000 that despite the dozens of camera flashes that went off on that sidewalk that night, capturing the sight of an enormously famous film executive trying to pound in the head of a young newspaper reporter, I have never once seen a photo. Back then, Harvey could spin - or suppress - anything; there were so many journalists on his payroll, working as consultants on movie projects, or as screenwriters, or for his magazine.



Info

Turkish President Erdogan announces operation in Idlib, northern Syria

Turkish army tanks
© REUTERS/ Revolutionary Forces of Syria Media OfficeTurkish army tanks make their way towards the Syrian border town of Jarbulus, Syria, August 24, 2016
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has announced plans to deploy the country's soldiers to Syria's Idlib, where the Free Syrian Army rebel fighters backed by Ankara have launched an operation.

"We intend to further enhance our steps in providing safety to Idlib now. There is a serious operation in Idlib today and it is going to continue," Erdogan said as quoted by Anadolu news agency, adding that the "Turkish soldiers are not there yet."

He also vowed support for "our brothers in Idlib," who left Aleppo for Idlib, apparently referring to militants who left the city freed by the Syrian army in December 2016 as a result of an agreement backed by Russia.

Currently, Idlib is mostly controlled by Tahrir al-Sham, a militant group led by al-Nusra Front terrorist group (banned in Russia), al-Qaeda's former Syrian affiliate. The group is not party to the agreement on setting up a de-escalation zone in Idlib agreed upon during the Syrian peace talks in Astana brokered by Russia, Iran and Turkey.

Comment: Earlier today it was reported by Fort Russ News that the Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan announced the start of a military operation in the northwestern Syrian province of Idlib with the aim of "restoring stability and security".
The following photos show Turkish forces with artillery being prepared along the Syrian border in Turkey's Hatay province.

Turkish artillery
Turkish combat vehicle
Turkish combat vehicles
A video also emerged of the residents of Reyhanli in Hatay province applauding the deployment of Turkish tanks ahead of the Idlib operation.

It is worth highlighting that Turkey was the biggest sponsor of these jihadist forces since the beginning of the Syrian War in 2011.