Puppet MastersS

Arrow Down

As govt shutdown looms, Trump threatens to veto spending bill over border wall

Stone walling
© depositphotos/KJNStonewalling?
US President Donald Trump says he's considering vetoing the freshly-passed $1.3 trillion spending bill over immigration issues. He cited a lack of funding for his much-touted Mexican border wall and concerns over DACA.

Trump tweeted Friday morning that he is considering blocking the bill because 800,000 'Dreamer' immigrants aren't even mentioned in the legislation.

"DACA was abandoned by the Democrats. Very unfair to them! Would have been tied to desperately needed Wall," the president added.

It was thought that a government shutdown had been narrowly avoided as the bill passed the Senate and the House of Representatives in a whirlwind process in the early hours of Friday morning. It was widely anticipated that the president would sign the bill to avoid another government closure with funds due to run out on Saturday.

Eye 2

John Bolton - The psycho with a hammer is looking for nails

john bolton hammer
President Trump congratulated Vladimir Putin to his reelection as president of the Russian Federation. It was a matter of simply courtesy to do so. The Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs (aka the National Security Advisor), three star general McMaster, had advised him to not congratulate Putin. (McMaster now claims differently.) That was bad advice. But it became even worse when McMaster, or someone in his shop, promptly leak this to the press. The usual Republican nutters like John McCain grumbled and Trump was furious.

Trump decided to fire McMaster the very next day. He had it coming. Both the White House Chief of Staff Kerry as well as the Secretary of Defense Mattis wanted McMaster out. Unfortunately for them Trump chose a replacement that they did not want and will find difficult to live with.

John Bolton is not a neo-conservative. He does not dream of 'spreading democracy' or 'nation building'. He is a 'smash, burn and leave' libertarian hawk. He is also an exceptionally avid bureaucrat who knows how to get the things he wants done. That quality is what makes him truly dangerous. Bolton is known for sweet-talking to his superiors, being ruthless against competitors and for kicking down on everyone below him.

Comment: A retrospective on Bolton:


Gear

A temporary ploy: The UK, the EU and the US gang-up on Russia

Vladimir Putin
Vladimir Putin
Introduction

For the greater part of a decade the US, the UK and the EU have been carrying out a campaign to undermine and overthrow the Russian government and in particular to oust President Putin. Fundamental issues are at stake including the real possibility of a nuclear war.

The most recent western propaganda campaign and one of the most virulent is the charge launched by the UK regime of Prime Minister Theresa May. The Brits have claimed that Russian secret agents conspired to poison a former Russian double-agent and his daughter in England , threatening the sovereignty and safety of the British people. No evidence has ever been presented. Instead the UK expelled Russian diplomats and demands harsher sanctions, to increase tensions. The UK and its US and EU patrons are moving toward a break in relations and a military build-up.

A number of fundamental questions arise regarding the origins and growing intensity of this anti-Russian animus.

Why do the Western regimes now feel Russia is a greater threat then in the past? Do they believe Russia is more vulnerable to Western threats or attacks? Why do the Western military leaders seek to undermine Russia's defenses? Do the US economic elites believe it is possible to provoke an economic crisis and the demise of President Putin's government? What is the strategic goal of Western policymakers? Why has the UK regime taken the lead in the anti-Russian crusade via the fake toxin accusations at this time?

Comment: See also:


Info

EU Council ditches May's Skripal poisoning ultimatum to Russia, gives only half-hearted support to UK's propaganda narrative

eu russia
In my previous article about the failure of Britain's allies to give Britain the strong support it expected in the Skripal case I predicted that the EU Council meeting on 22nd March 2018 would publish a statement which appeared to be strongly supportive of Britain but which on careful examination would turn out to be less than it seemed.

So it has been proved, as shown by the statement the EU Council did put out, which has now published on the Europa website
  1. The European Council condemns in the strongest possible terms the recent attack in Salisbury, expresses its deepest sympathies to all whose lives have been threatened and lends its support to the ongoing investigation. It agrees with the United Kingdom government's assessment that it is highly likely that the Russian Federation is responsible and that there is no plausible alternative explanation. We stand in unqualified solidarity with the United Kingdom in the face of this grave challenge to our shared security.
  2. The use of chemical weapons, including the use of any toxic chemicals as weapons under any circumstances, is completely unacceptable, must be systematically and rigorously condemned and constitutes a security threat to us all. Member States will coordinate on the consequences to be drawn in the light of the answers provided by the Russian authorities. The European Union will remain closely focused on this issue and its implications.
  3. Against this background, the European Union must strengthen its resilience to Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear-related risks, including through closer cooperation between the European Union and its Member States as well as NATO. The European Union and its Member States should also continue to bolster their capabilities to address hybrid threats, including in the areas of cyber, strategic communication and counter-intelligence. The European Council invites the European Commission and the High Representative to take this work forward and report on progress by the June European Council. (bold italics added)
One of the great problems any person trying to make sense of the current state of international relations immediately encounters is that any news concerning Russia is immediately subjected to a vast volume of negative noise.

Comment: On the talks leading to the statement, RT adds the following:
Diplomats familiar with talks said Greece and Italy did not want the language changed. "They say that there's no smoking gun, or at least not yet," said an EU diplomat to Politico. Greece has denied calling for alterations but admitted it lobbied for a more "clear" text.

Theresa May's team has been hoping for unequivocal world backing, but has not received it. She expelled 23 Russian diplomats from London last week, and has threatened further punishment.

The UK said it was not a snub by Brussels that the language is cooler than last week, especially that used by Germany and France, but said getting 27 countries to agree is difficult. It is especially damaging for Theresa May after President Putin was praised by Trump in a call after his re-election on Sunday, despite her hopes the special friendship between the UK and the US would see Trump backing her fully.

Jean-Claude Juncker also upset the UK after sending a congratulatory letter to Putin. EU leaders will discuss the new text over dinner at the European Council summit Thursday. Despite Britain's allegations against Moscow, Russia has repeatedly insisted that the Kremlin had nothing to do with the attack on former double-agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter in Salisbury.



Bullseye

Russian ambassador to UK on Skripal case: UK gov't cannot be trusted, other nations would be wise to demand proof

Alexander Yakovenko
© Simon Dawson / ReutersRussia's ambassador to the UK, Alexander Yakovenko
When it comes to allegations against Russia, the UK government cannot be trusted, so other nations would be wise to demand proof, Russia's ambassador in London said, commenting on the Skripal poisoning saga.

"Don't take the words of the British for granted," Alexander Yakovenko told journalists during a press conference at the Russian Embassy when asked what his advice to European nations would be on the unfolding UK-Russian conflict. "I am quoting Ronald Reagan: trust but verify."

The ambassador spoke to the media on Thursday to denounce what he called a "hysterical anti-Russian campaign" conducted by the British government and media outlets over the poisoning of former Russian double agent Sergei Skripal and two other people, his daughter Yulia and a police officer, in Salisbury. Prime Minister Theresa May accused the Kremlin of ordering a chemical weapon attack against the man and has been rallying Britain's allies against Moscow.

Sherlock

The money trail behind Trump, Bannon and Cambridge Analytica leads to Republican mega-donors Robert and Rebekah Mercer

Robert and Rebekah Mercer
Far-right Republican mega-donors Robert and Rebekah Mercer
Last evening, the Washington Post reported that Steve Bannon was the individual overseeing the earliest collection of Facebook data for Cambridge Analytica in 2014. The company is under investigation in both the U.S. and U.K. for data mining private information on more than 50 million Facebook users to target voters for the 2016 Trump presidential campaign.

Bannon, with funding from billionaire hedge fund manager, Robert Mercer, was involved in the launch of Cambridge Analytica in 2013. Both Bannon and Mercer served on the Cambridge Analytica Board after its founding.

Bannon is the former executive chairman of Breitbart News which also received funding from Mercer. Bannon also served as CEO of Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign and as senior counselor to the 45th president for the first seven months of his term until a falling out last year. Robert Mercer was a large donor to the Trump campaign.

Essentially, whatever Bannon has been connected to since at least 2013, Mercer money has been involved in the effort. Take, for example, the Government Accountability Institute (GAI). It was founded in 2012 by Peter Schweizer and Steve Bannon. Schweitzer is currently listed on its website as its President and Rebekah Mercer, daughter of Robert, is listed as its Chair. Rebekah Mercer played a major role in the Trump campaign and served on the Trump Transition Team's Executive Committee, which played a major role in selecting cabinet appointees.

Read the rest of the article here...

Map

Pedophile Mueller witness flees country after past convictions made public

George Nader
© C-SPAN via APThis 1998 frame from video provided by C-SPAN shows president and editor of Middle East Insight George Nader.
A key witness in the investigation into President Donald Trump's alleged collusion with Russia has fled the country, DailyMail.com can disclose.

Convicted pedophile George Nader was allegedly both a paid adviser for the United Arab Emirates and had close ties to the Trump administration.

He met Jared Kushner and Steve Bannon in Trump Tower just before the inauguration at a meeting they held with the de facto ruler of the United Arab Emirates.

Nader was thrust into the limelight after being interviewed twice by special counsel Robert Mueller as part of his probe into Russian meddling in the US election and collusion with the Trump campaign team.

Now DailyMail.com can reveal he has flown back to the UAE, according to two sources close to the country's de-facto ruler Mohammed bin Zayed, who is known by his initials 'MBZ.

The revelation comes just days after Nader was revealed to be a convicted pedophile.

Magnify

Iraq War: Fifteen-year anniversary of modern America's worst foreign policy disaster goes by largely unremarked

dubya
© Getty Images
The most tragic and infuriating piece of writing of the week came in Tuesday's New York Times. It carried a very plain and simple headline.

"Fifteen Years Ago, America Destroyed My Country"
My short visit only confirmed my conviction and fear that the invasion would spell disaster for Iraqis. Removing Saddam was just a byproduct of another objective: dismantling the Iraqi state and its institutions. That state was replaced with a dysfunctional and corrupt semi-state. We were still filming in Baghdad when L. Paul Bremer III, the head of the Coalition Provisional Authority, announced the formation of the so-called Governing Council in July 2003. The names of its members were each followed by their sect and ethnicity. Many of the Iraqis we spoke to on that day were upset with institutionalization of an ethno-sectarian quota system. Ethnic and sectarian tensions already existed, but their translation into political currency was toxic. Those unsavry characters on the governing council, most of whom were allies of the United States from the preceding decade, went on to loot the country, making it one of the most corrupt in the world.
Except for Sinan Antoon's richly deserved jeremiad, the 15th anniversary of the worst foreign policy disaster in modern American history went sailing by largely unremarked, at least in this country. After all, over here, everyone was too busy keeping track of the latest news involving the vulgar talking yam the country had installed as president, how he was still truckling to Russian oligarchs, how he was still being run to ground by Bob Mueller, and about how he was being outwitted and out-lawyered by a lady from the adult entertainment industry.

Stock Up

US-China trade war: Trump imposes $60bn in tariffs - China vows to retaliate - US says 'buy more American gas' to avoid more tariffs

aluminum china
© Aly SongWorkers ride on an motor rickshaw through an aluminium ingots depot in Wuxi, Jiangsu province.
China is readying itself for a trade war with the US as Washington reportedly plans to announce new measures against Beijing within days. Officials have been seeking support from other nations and world trade bodies.

US media reports have claimed the White House was preparing punitive measures, including tariffs on Chinese technology and telecoms commodity imports valued at $60 billion, to be a announced on Friday.

That was despite the much-vaunted rapport between US President Donald Trump and China's Xi Jinping, following the former's state visit to Beijing last year. A fortnight ago, Trump announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, hitting the EU, Japan and South Korea, as well as China.

"The Chinese side never wants to fight a trade war with anybody, but if we are forced to, we will not hide from it," Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying warned on Wednesday. Beijing will "definitely take firm and necessary countermeasures to defend its legal rights," she said, as quoted by China's Global Times.

Comment: Trump then announced the $60 billion tariff package, aimed at curbing "intellectual property theft":
Trump has signed a Section 301 trade action with China that could be about $60 billion in tariffs, he said adding that he asked China to reduce trade surplus immediately by $100 billion.

"We have right now an $800 billion dollar trade deficit with the world," he said before signing a memorandum. "It is the largest deficit of any country in the history of our world. It's out of control."

"We're gonna get it taken care of. Frankly it's going to make us a much stronger, much richer nation."

"Just use the reciprocal. If they charge us, we charge them the same thing."

Washington is targeting more than 100 types of Chinese goods, from clothing to electronics. The value of the tariffs is based on US estimates of economic damage caused by intellectual-property theft by China, an anonymous source familiar with the matter told Bloomberg.

The announcement comes after the Trump administration accused China of "state-led, market-distorting efforts to force, pressure, and steal US technologies and intellectual property," according to a statement by principal deputy press secretary Raj Shah on Wednesday.
China's response? A "fight to the end" using "all necessary measures":
In the statement, China's US Embassy said the country doesn't want a trade war, but "will not recoil from one" should it come to it. It also accused the US of "ignoring rational voices," and of disregarding "the mutually-beneficial nature of China-US trade relations and the consensus reached by the two countries of managing differences constructively through consultations."

"If a trade war were initiated by the US, China would fight to the end to defend its own legitimate interests with all necessary measures," it added. China strongly opposes what it described as a "typical unilateral trade protectionist action" taken by the Trump administration on Thursday. It said the US action will "directly harm the interests of US consumers, companies, and financial markets."

The embassy urged the US to "cease and desist, make conscious decisions and avoid placing China-US trade relations in danger," as it could "end up hurting itself."
...
"I have tremendous respect for President Xi," Trump said, after signing the new measures on Thursday. "We have a great relationship. They're helping us a lot in North Korea and that's China. But we have a trade deficit, depending on the way you calculate, of $504 billion."

"It is the largest deficit of any country in the history of our world. It's out of control," he added. "We're gonna get it taken care of. Frankly it's going to make us a much stronger, much richer nation."

US stocks dropped after Trump's announcement. The Dow Jones industrial average fell 722 points, almost 3 percent, and the Nasdaq fell 2.4 percent. Shares in US exporters, including Boeing, also dropped, on foot of the feared trade war with China.
But the Trump team has a counter-proposal: buy more American LNG, get fewer tariffs:
"China needs to import very, very large amounts of LNG and, from their point, it would be very logical to import more of it from us, if for no reason other than to diversify their sources of supply," said US Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross in an interview with Bloomberg. "It would also have the side effect of reducing the deficit."
...
However, Washington's demand for China to buy more American gas is unlikely to cut the deficit, according to a Bloomberg-polled analyst Anastacia Dialynas. Beijing has commitments with other countries, and only 40 million tons of China's 2030 imports aren't already under contract, which accounts only for $13.5 billion at current prices.



Dominoes

The ghost of Col. Gaddafi reaches up from the grave to haunt 'King Sarko'

gaddafi sarkozy
© Reuters / Pascal RossignolLibya's then President Muammar Gaddafi (left) greets his then French counterpart Nicolas Sarkozy at Bab Azizia Palace in Tripoli, on July 25, 2007
NATO's 2011 war on Libya was unanimously sold across the West as a necessary humanitarian operation against the proverbial evil dictator (Hillary Clinton: "We came, we saw, he died."). Russia and China were firmly against it.

Now, in a stunning historical reversal, the ghost of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi seems to have come back to haunt former French President Nicolas Sarkozy, the self-described superstar of that R2P ("responsibility to protect") spectacular.

The "Colonel Sarko bombshell" exploded on Wednesday evening: he had been placed under formal investigation for passive corruption, illegal campaign financing, and misappropriation of Libyan state funds.

Sarkozy spent the whole of Tuesday, from 8am until midnight, answering questions in police custody from crack investigators specialized in corruption, tax evasion and money laundering. He was allowed to sleep at home but had to be back the next morning, up until the early evening. He was finally released on bail.