Puppet MastersS


Bad Guys

GOP senator wants US to have greater authority to dominate the world after Helsinki summit

Senator Bob Corker
© Greg Nash
Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) is urging his GOP colleagues to crack down on President Trump's tariff authority following Monday's joint press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin that sparked widespread, bipartisan backlash.

"As the president taxes Americans with tariffs, he pushes away our allies and further strengthens Putin," Corker said in a tweet Tuesday. "It is time for Congress to step up and take back our authorities. We have legislation to do that. Let's vote."

He added that the "dam is finally breaking. Thankfully" - an apparent reference to the relationship between Trump and congressional Republicans that the GOP senator once described as a "cult-like situation."


Comment: Trump's 'trade war' with China as well as wanting to improve relations with Russia move toward a normalized position of US influence in the world, and it is clear that the powers that be in Washington are none too pleased with that!


Snakes in Suits

Former CIA Dir Brennan threatens Intel community may begin withholding information from Trump

Brennan
© AP/Scott ApplewhiteFormer CIA Director John Brennan
Former CIA Director John Brennan continued Tuesday to criticize President Trump's performance at the Helsinki summit, saying Mr. Trump could have potentially risked intelligence capabilities during his private meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin and the intel community might begin to withhold intelligence from Mr. Trump.

In light of Mr. Trump's comments about the intelligence community, Mr. Brennan said "there very well might be" a shift in the covert community to "withhold vital intelligence" in order to protect that information.
"Dan Coats and Gina Haspel need to be on top of their game now and speak truth to power," he said, referring to Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and CIA Director Gina Haspel. "And make sure Trump doesn't get away with this."
Mr. Brennan said Mr. Trump was "way, way out of his depth" meeting one-on-one with the "master manipulator," Mr. Putin.

No CIA agent would have entertained an individual private talk with any Russian, Mr. Brennan said, because "that's just something we don't do."


Comment: What is appropriate for the CIA is not the same as what is appropriate for a sitting president.


Comment: Gotta side with the Pres on this one. Brennan "is a very bad guy."
Definition of Treason: - it rather sums up Brennan's statement of what he'd do to Trump.
  1. Noun. A betrayal of trust or confidence, a breach of faith, treachery
  2. Noun. A violation of one's allegiance to one's government or sovereign
  3. Noun. The criminal offense of acting to overthrow one's government, or of assisting others to do so



Footprints

Commandos Sans Frontières and the global expansion of US Special Operations Forces

Military
© WordPress.com
Early last month, at a tiny military post near the tumbledown town of Jamaame in Somalia, small arms fire began to ring out as mortar shells crashed down. When the attack was over, one Somali soldier had been wounded -- and had that been the extent of the casualties, you undoubtedly would never have heard about it.

As it happened, however, American commandos were also operating from that outpost and four of them were wounded, three badly enough to be evacuated for further medical care. Another special operator, Staff Sergeant Alexander Conrad, a member of the U.S. Army's Special Forces (also known as the Green Berets), was killed.

If the story sounds vaguely familiar -- combat by U.S. commandos in African wars that America is technically not fighting -- it should. Last December, Green Berets operating alongside local forces in Niger killed 11 Islamic State militants in a firefight. Two months earlier, in October, an ambush by an Islamic State terror group in that same country, where few Americans (including members of Congress) even knew U.S. special operators were stationed, left four U.S. soldiers dead -- Green Berets among them. (The military first described that mission as providing "advice and assistance" to local forces, then as a "reconnaissance patrol" as part of a broader "train, advise, and assist" mission, before it was finally exposed as a kill or capture operation.) Last May, a Navy SEAL was killed and two other U.S. personnel were wounded in a raid in Somalia that the Pentagon described as an "advise, assist, and accompany" mission. And a month earlier, a U.S. commando reportedly killed a member of the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA), a brutal militia that has terrorized parts of Central Africa for decades.

Comment: We can thank 9/11 for unleashing this brand of military terror on the world - a home-bred tragedy that opened many doors we may wish had remained closed. And, while troop reduction may grab a current headline, this article shows that statistics are cherry-picked to appease the criticisms while operations just continue and expand in numbers and costs under different sources and labels.


Snakes in Suits

Criminal protector Comey calls on 'patriots' to 'stand up to Trump'

ComeyCoatsBrennan
© NPR/Unknown/National/KJNFormer CIA Dir. John Brennan • Former FBI Dir. James Comey • Dir. Natl. Intel. Dan Coats
Former FBI director who was fired by president Donald Trump, and infamous for protecting the corrupt democrat, Hillary Clinton is calling on "patriots." He's asking all patriots to stand up to Trump's behavior.

According to CNN, James Comey has expressed his outrage with President Donald Trump on Monday, saying he had taken the side of Russian President Vladimir Putin over his own country and calling on people to stand up against him. In a Twitter post, Comey asked patriots to "reject the behavior of this president."

Former CIA Director John Brennan went as far as calling Trump's statements "treasonous," while former Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel called it "a sad day for the world," and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, a CNN national security analyst, said Trump had "essentially capitulated."

Comment: Of course Comey is coming out swinging...he has nothing to lose and everything to gain. As for the rest...they are all in the Agency clubs that collude with and support each other. The sides are swiftly forming between those who seek a gentler and prosperous future in working together globally - to those who seek to control and destroy everything in their path. At least, we now have no illusions. It is a fight striking the core of America. There will be victims.


Sheriff

White House weighing Putin offer of joint police interrogations

WilliamBrowder
© Francisco Seco/APWilliam Browder
The White House and the U.S. State Department are at odds over an offer by Russian President Vladimir Putin to allow U.S. prosecutors access to 12 Russians accused of hacking the 2016 election if Russian prosecutors who are pursuing Kremlin critic William Browder are allowed to interrogate several Americans.

The White House said late on July 18 that it is considering the offer, made by Putin to President Donald Trump at their summit in Helsinki on July 16, but the State Department and FBI dismissed Russia's request, with the department calling it "absolutely absurd."

Russia has accused Browder of tax evasion and fraud, with Putin claiming at the summit that the British financier had spirited $1.5 billion out of Russia illegally without paying taxes.
Browder, who as the head of Heritage Capital was once the West's largest investor in Russia, has been called "Putin's nemesis" for his role in successfully pushing through so-called Magnitsky laws in a number of Western nations that impose sanctions on human rights abusers in Russia and other countries.
Among several Americans who the Russian Prosecutor's Office has said it wants to interrogate in connection with its case against Browder is the former U.S. ambassador to Russia, Michael McFaul, who on July 17 called on the State Department to "push back" against the Russian interrogation requests.

Comment: What the WH wants to do versus what it will be allowed to do, is the question.


Laptop

100% DNC server hack not Russia: DWS refused FBI forensics; Comey refused to subpoena servers for analysis

PostElectionStrategies
© BRANCO/media@LimitGov.org
Mueller doesn't have any evidence for his allegations that the GRU hacked the DNC servers.

If the GRU (or any other hostile foreign agent) had hacked the DNC servers why did Debbie Wasserman Schultz refuse to allow the FBI access to the servers to perform a proper forensics examination of the servers, when her (false) allegations of Russian hacking were first made in 2016?

Why did she rely on Crowdstrike who are a completely disreputable outfit, known liars and anti-Russia propagandists with massive conflicts of interest who are known to have lied about the attribution of previous hacks?

Crowdstrike didn't produce any credible evidence of any Russian hack. The only "hard evidence" they produced was a piece of 4 year old Ukrainian malware, that was freely available on the net, could have been put on the DNC server by any hacker, and even then it wasn't linked to any data extraction activity. Oh they also said some of the metadata or docs had Cyrillic lettering. Why the f*ck would Russian government hackers insert Cyrillic lettering into the metadata or document info? This was obviously a fraud and red herring by someone else (or this metadata was just fabricated by Crowdstrike and didn't exist before Crowdstrike doctored the evidence).

Comment: There are certain similarities between this accusatory movement in the US and how the UK has parlayed its Novichok incidences into full-blown accusations towards Russia. Different time, different place, different scenario - but the blame without evidence is the same. Repetition is a marketing tool. And that is what clueless people remember.


Attention

If Trump-Putin press conference was a shock, you're not paying attention

TrumPutball
© Chris McGrath/Getty ImagesThe Gift
Disgraceful. Embarrassing. A complete lack of grasp of the situation. Such were the observations about President Trump's performance at the joint press conference with Vladimir Putin. Everyone is free to like or dislike the way Trump navigates the world, but I would suggest those descriptions are more suited to the swarm of wild overreaction.

It has become a familiar rhythm for the President to do or say something, only to be attacked reflexively by his harshest opponents. But the Monday festival of totally wrongheaded analysis ensnared even the occasionally sympathetic.

One could expect the bug-eyed calls for impeachment, and the media chorus that Trump had somehow committed some grave offense against American honor. But the triangulation necessary to understand this episode was apparently too much heavy lifting for even some occasional supporters.

So, I'll make it easy. If you were expecting Donald Trump to wag a finger at Putin at that lectern in Helsinki, throwing down an ultimatum to never, ever mess with our elections again, that was enormously foolish. Not because it would be undeserved. Because it would have sprouted more negatives than positives.

Imagine for a moment that the President had told Putin where to stuff that souvenir World Cup soccer ball. The media would have briefly approved, critics might have issued momentary grudging appreciation, and John Brennan might have put down the voodoo doll. Meanwhile, the layer of ice that would have encased the relationship would shut the door on things Trump actually wants to achieve, goals a little more lasting than kicking Putin in the shins in public.

Comment: The gross animosity and swirling innuendo from the left is increasing. Those who are principals in the fight against the President see an opportunity to double down and go for the jugular. It is a gamble but wishful thinking. Blow back on Trump's performance at the summit will not erase the nefarious actions nor intent of the FBI, DNC and Department of Justice. Instead it is polarizing the country with a maelstrom of viciousness unparalleled in recent times. The criminals are killing America to save themselves.


Bullseye

Kevin Shipp: 'The indictments are coming - Trump cannot be bribed'

Kevin Shipp
© SHTF.com
Whistleblower and former CIA officer Kevin Shipp stated clearly that indictments are coming for Hillary Clinton and the deep state because Donald Trump cannot be bribed. In an interview with USA Watchdog's Greg Hunter, Shipp says this deep state espionage will eventually be exposed to the public.

During his discussion with Hunter, Shipp says that what Hillary Clinton did with her charity and Uranium One while she was Secretary of State was a crime for the history books. Shipp explains, "Hillary Clinton used this to launder money in foreign banks so it wasn't subject to U.S. laws, congressional subpoenas, or FOIA demands for the evidence. This was done to launder this money globally into the Clinton Foundation so the U.S. government could not examine it at all."


"Obviously [Hillary's] not stupid, she is diabolical," says Shipp of Hillary Clinton's decision to have an unsecured server as Secretary of State. "She knew darn well what she was doing...the Clinton Foundation is a global crime syndicate."

Comment: Lisa Page's testimony blew the lid: Killary's emails were hacked by China. The FBI created a grand cover-up to protect Clinton's bid for the Presidency, knowing that doing so would protect themselves as well.

See: Lisa Page testimony rats out top FBI officials: Bureau bosses covered up evidence CHINA hacked Hillary's top secret emails


Arrow Down

Russia asks UN to consider easing N. Korea sanctions as US seeks action

NK flag barbwire
© newindianexpress.com
Russia's envoy to North Korea said on Wednesday it would be logical to raise the question of easing sanctions on North Korea with the United Nations Security Council, as the United States pushes for a halt to refined petroleum exports to Pyongyang.

"The positive change on the Korean peninsula is now obvious," said the ambassador, Alexander Matsegora, according to the RIA news agency, adding that Russia was ready to help modernize North Korea's energy system if sanctions were lifted and if Pyongyang can find funding for the modernization.
The U.N. Security Council has unanimously boosted sanctions on North Korea since 2006 in a bid to choke off funding for Pyongyang's nuclear and ballistic missile programs, banning exports including coal, iron, lead, textiles and seafood, and capping imports of crude oil and refined petroleum products.
China tried late last month to get the Security Council to issue a statement praising the June 12 Singapore meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and expressing its "willingness to adjust the measures on the DPRK in light of the DPRK's compliance with the resolutions."

Comment: Stick and Carrot has worked so far. Will the growing vengeance in the US towards President Trump and 'anything Russia' cloud judgement and sabotage the progress with North Korea?


Attention

Trikki Nikki calls Human Rights Council the UN's 'greatest failure' to justify US exit

NikkiHaley
© Toya Sarno Jordan/ReutersUS Ambassador to UN Nikki Haley
US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley has launched another attack on the UN human rights body, calling it a failure for listing such countries as China and Cuba among its members. She had no qualms about Saudi Arabia, though.

Haley was speaking at the Heritage Foundation think tank, explaining the reasons for the US withdrawal from the UN Human Rights Council, which had drawn almost unanimous condemnation, on Wednesday. She singled out Cuba, China and Venezuela as the countries whose presence supposedly tarnishes the council's credibility.

Pointing at the Council's membership criteria as one of its two major problems, along with its supposed bias against US ally Israel, Haley said that since she took office and up until now "its members included some of the worst human rights violators - the dictatorships of Cuba, China and Venezuela all have seats on the Council."

Comment: A mind is a shameful thing to waste...where there is one.