Puppet MastersS


Arrow Down

PM May humiliated yet again as MPs demand more of say in Brexit, DUP say offer is "meaningless"

Dominic Grieve
Dominic Grieve's change passed in the Commons
THERESA May has been defeated on Brexit for the second time in 24 hours today as rebels wrestled back power from the Government.

Hopes that she can get next week's deal passed by MPs are now fading fast after she was slapped down yet again by politicians demanding more of a say on our EU exit.

The PM will now be forced to make a statement within three days if her withdrawal agreement gets thrown out by MPs on Tuesday as expected.

The amendment, which was proposed by ex-Attorney General and Remainer in chief, Dominic Grieve, passed 308 to 297.

It comes just hours after MPs voted in favour of limiting the Government's tax powers in a No Deal Brexit last night - another humiliation for Mrs May.

Comment: The Guardian provides more details on the DUP issue:
DUP dismisses May's Brexit pledge to consult Stormont as meaningless

Stormont
© Niall Carson/PA‌The gates at Stormont in Belfast which has not been sitting for two years.
Theresa May's attempts to woo the Democratic Unionist party with a pledge over the contentious backstop have failed after the party branded the proposals as "cosmetic and meaningless".

At the same time Ireland's prime minister Leo Varadkar, reflecting the principles of the withdrawal agreement, said Stormont could not have the power of veto over the backstop.

"I don't think we can have a situation whereby the Northern Ireland executive or assembly has a veto power [over the backstop] because that would essentially give one of the two communities veto power over the other," he told Reuters in Ethiopia.

With less than a week to go to the critical parliamentary vote on the Brexit withdrawal agreement, the government appears no closer to securing the 10 votes of the DUP MPs needed to get the deal over the line.

In a 13-page document published on Wednesday, the government promised a "strong role" for the currently defunct Stormont assembly if the Brexit backstop was triggered.

It promised that if the trade talks with the EU failed to result in a deal by the end of the transition period in December 2020, Stormont would be consulted before the government decided its next move. Under the current deal the UK can ask for an extension in the transition period or enter the backstop arrangements.

Under the plan, the view of the assembly, which has not been sitting for two years, would then be presented to parliament before MPs took a final decision.

The paper promised that this "Stormont lock" on the backstop would be a legally binding commitment.

"Where appropriate we will legislate to ensure that these commitments have legal force," the government said in its paper, the UK Government Commitments to Northern Ireland and its Integral Place in the United Kingdom.

However, the DUP immediately rejected the paper, dashing hopes that the party would get behind May for the vote on her Brexit deal next Tuesday.

Tory sources who were ambivalent about the vote had said that the support of the DUP could "unlock" 20 to 30 more hard Brexiter votes for May, something now unlikely.

Nigel Dodds, the leader of the DUP in the House of Commons, said the proposal to ensure "a strong role for the Northern Ireland assembly before Northern Ireland-specific backstop provisions are given effect is cosmetic and meaningless".

He said the paper itself indicated that the proposals made it plain the Stormont assembly would never be able to "override" the backstop as it would be part of an internationally binding treaty.

Any objections that were raised in Stormont could be rejected by London, said Dodds, MP for Belfast North.

The DUP's Sammy Wilson told Sky News there was "nothing at all" to fear from a no-deal Brexit.

"We would prefer to have the relationship sorted out but it can't be sorted out on the basis of breaking up the UK," said the East Antrim MP.

"This issue is far too important," he added, "This is an issue about if Northern Ireland stays in the UK, whether Northern Ireland keeps linked to its main market in GB. Constitutionally and economically if this deal went through it would ruin us.

"We would do what the IRA failed to do over 40 years of a terrorist campaign," he said in reference to their desire for a united Ireland.

Publishing the paper, cabinet office minister David Lidington said the "commitments underline Northern Ireland's integral place in the United Kingdom and reflect that it is the only part of the United Kingdom sharing a land border with an EU member state.".
The EU referendum was merely a ploy by the ruling UK government to maintain power, but having royally backfired it continues to expose them as the utter shambles that they are. Even the DUP, who they bought off with an offer of a billion in funding, doesn't trust them: Brexit: A Political Farce Based on a Public Lie

See also: And check out SOTT radio's:


Attention

Best of the Web: Inside Integrity Initiative's desperate attempt to sabotage Russian-German relations

germany
© AFP 2018 / CHRISTOF STACHE
On the afternoon of January 4 I was putting the finishing touches to a series of articles about the Integrity Initiative's activities in Germany, when hacking syndicate Anonymous released another tranche of files plucked from the organization's internal servers. The content was so explosive I was forced to put the multi-part project on hold.

The new trove included several highly incriminating files related to the poisoning of Sergei Skripal in March 2018, which raised a number of extremely serious questions about the shadowy British state and NATO-funded 'think tank' and its connections with the affair.

A few hours after publishing an article based on a precursory investigation of the documents, I received a curious email from political scientist Hannes Adomeit - the subject line 'Criminal Charges against Kit Klarenberg' - which made me somewhat glad I'd postponed my German series.

Comment: More on Integrity Initiative's blatant disinformation campaign:


Eye 1

Assessing James Clapper's Jan. 2017 'assessment' on Russia-gate

James clapper obama
© The White HouseClapper: Showing handpicked evidence?
On the 2nd anniversary of the "assessment" blaming Russia for "collusion" with Trump there is still no evidence other than showing the media "colluded" with the spooks, says Ray McGovern.

The banner headline atop page one of The New York Times print edition two years ago today, on January 7, 2017, set the tone for two years of Dick Cheney-like chicanery: "Putin Led Scheme to Aid Trump, Report Says."

Under a media drumbeat of anti-Russian hysteria, credulous Americans were led to believe that Donald Trump owed his election victory to the president of Russia, whose "influence campaign" according to the Times quoting the intelligence report, helped "President-elect Trump's election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton."

Bulb

Bloomberg: Macron's response to Yellow Vests makes Putin like soft

yellow vest french flag
French President Emmanuel Macron's handouts to Yellow Vest protesters have damped the demonstrators' fervor somewhat but failed to stop the regular eruptions of violence, so now Macron and his government have decided to wield a heavier stick. The new rules being proposed ought to raise some eyebrows: They're tougher than the norms Russian President Vladimir Putin's regime uses to suppress political opposition.


Comment: Yet France is considered a democracy and Russia is considered a dictatorship. Hmm... Maybe, just maybe, Russia is not a dictatorship? And maybe, just maybe, Western democracies are not as superior to Russia as most in the West believe?


The shift from a conciliatory tone toward law and order began with Macron's New Year's speech, in which he condemned extremists who had no right to speak in the name of the French people. "They are only the spokespeople of a hate-filled mob," he said. Then, on Monday, Prime Minister Edouard Philippe announced that the government would seek a new law to crack down on violent protest so that those who "take advantage of these manifestations to overrun, to break, to burn" don't "have the last word." The bill, he said, would likely be considered by parliament in early February; according to Philippe, it would be similar to a measure the Senate, controlled by the center-right opposition, approved in October.

MIB

Phil Giraldi: Is Paul Whelan a spy?

Paul Whelan
© Paul Whelan obiteljski arhivPaul Whelan
The media has a new bit of speculation that fits neatly into the flagging Russiagate narrative. It concerns Paul Whelan, a high school graduate Marine Corps dishonorable discharge, who is currently working in corporate security for a Michigan-based auto parts manufacturer. Whelan, who lives alone, is self-taught in Russian and has engaged in tourist travel to the country a number of times. He was reportedly arrested late last month in Moscow while ostensibly attending a friend's wedding and charged with espionage. Forty-eight year-old Whelan is clearly an odd duck and is notable for having four passports - Great Britain, Ireland, Canada and that of the United States.

Press coverage of the incident has nearly unanimously decided that the spying charge against Whelan is phony and that he is being held as bait to arrange for an exchange with Maria Butina, who is in jail in Virginia after being charged with acting as an unregistered agent of the Russian government and engaging in conspiracy. The media and the usual pundits base their conclusion on absolutely no evidence whatsoever apart from their conviction that Russian President Vladimir Putin is a bad man who would do almost anything to irritate the United States and overthrow its system of government. Oddly, the press watchdogs fail to note how the current federal government is doing a damned fine job destroying itself without any assistance from the Kremlin. If Putin really wanted to damage the US, he would be best advised to leave it alone and let Congress and the White House do the heavy lifting for him.

Unlike the mainstream media, I rather expect that the charges against Whelan could be more-or-less correct, though not in the way the press has framed the story, which is that Whelan is such a flawed character that he could not possibly meet the requirements to be working for any sophisticated spy organization. The New York Times in its coverage of the story interviewed several former CIA officers who had served in Russia, but asked the wrong questions. The reporter wanted to know if Whelan could possibly be an employee of US intelligence. The ex-Agency officers replied "no" because of his criminal record while a Marine and other oddities in his career, which included some marginal involvement with low-level law enforcement.

Comment: Previous coverage of Whelan's arrest:


Red Flag

Finian Cunningham: Why the United Kingdom is so aggressive towards Russia

UK navy
© AP Photo / Marcos Moreno
Why is Britain spending billions of dollars on two new super aircraft carriers? That's the question the state-owned BBC asks. However, don't expect the British Bullsh**t Corporation to provide any insightful answers.

The two ships in question - now coming into service - are HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales, lovingly named after the British monarchy. The total cost for building these "leviathans" is around £6 billion ($8bn), according to the BBC. But when fully fitted out with new warplanes, the cost will soar to multiples of that figure.

At a time when poverty is hitting record levels in Britain and the country is facing an economic meltdown over its Brexit divorce from the European Union, it is certainly pertinent to question the seemingly twisted priorities of British state planners in putting these mega warships into service.

Comment: See: Former British Army chief admits Russia is justified in seeing NATO aggression as 'strategic threat'


Propaganda

Collusion with... Ukraine? NY Times corrects its bombshell 'Russiagate' report

Donald Trump, Paul Manafort
© Reuters / Rick WilkingThen-candidate Donald Trump and his campaign manager Paul Manafort at the GOP convention in Cleveland, Ohio, July 2016
It was supposed to be a slam-dunk proof of "collusion" with Russia: President Donald Trump's former campaign manager Paul Manafort shared polling data with a "Kremlin-linked oligarch," the NY Times reported. Except he hadn't.

Documents submitted by Manafort's lawyers in Special Counsel Robert Mueller's "Russiagate" probe, unsealed Tuesday, were redacted improperly and showed that Manafort was in communication with Konstantin Kilimnik, a Russian-Ukrainian whom the FBI has "assessed" has "connections" with Russian intelligence based on where he went to college in the 1980s.

That was old news, however, so the Times needed something even more bombastic: citing an anonymous source described as "a person knowledgeable about the situation,"the paper reported that Kilimnik passed the data on to Oleg Deripaska, "a Russian oligarch close to the Kremlin."

"This is the closest thing we have seen to collusion," the Times quoted Clint Watts, one of the professional Russiagate alarmists. And then... oops.

Dollars

Russia shifts $100bn of its reserves into yuan, yen & euro in a great dollar dump

throwing money
© Getty Images
The Central Bank of Russia has moved further away from reliance on the US dollar and has axed its share in the country's foreign reserves to a historic low, transferring about $100 billion into euro, Japanese yen and Chinese yuan.

The share of the US currency in Russia's international reserves portfolio has dramatically decreased in just three months between March and June 2018, from 43.7 percent to a new low of 21.9 percent, according to the Central Bank's latest quarterly report, which is issued with a six-month lag.

Brick Wall

Chuck Schumer says he's had 'enough' of Trump border wall memes

the wall is coming
© Instagram/RealDonaldTrump
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) did not see the humor in the Game of Thrones memes President Donald Trump used to announce his plans to build a wall along the U.S. southern border, telling him he had "enough."

"Enough with the memes," the New York Democrat senator tweeted in response to Trump's wall meme. "Just quit hurting innocent people and re-open the government."

Comment: See also:


X

Pundits rip Pelosi & Schumer Presidential Address response to shreds

Pelosi & Schumer
"I've been more excited about colonoscopies than he was giving the speech tonight."

The awkward, bizarre visual of low-energy House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) sharing one podium to deliver a response to President Donald Trump on Tuesday night was even too much for MSNBC host Brian Williams and Democrat operative James Carville to spin.

Both Williams and Carville openly mocked the Democrats during a late-night segment Tuesday. Williams flat out called the response "so bad" and Carville noted that he's looked more enthused to get "colonoscopies" than Schumer looked at that podium.

Ouch.

Comment: For a broader examination of the undynamac duo's response, as well as Trump's much better address, watch: