Puppet MastersS


Biohazard

Brain poisoning by Russian nerve agent - Alexey Navalny infects German chancellery

navalny merkel
There is only one certainty (zweifelsfreie Nachweis) in the case of Alexei Navalny and the traces (Spuren) which have been found in his skin, urine and blood, and in a water bottle, by the German Army's chemical warfare laboratory in Munich.

This certainty is that, in order to believe the German and other government interpretations which have been given of the evidence to date, you have to be suffering from a severe case of brain washing. The lighter the spectrometric mass or weight of the reported Novichok spuren, the heavier the measurable wash on the brain required to believe they are evidence of a Russian state crime.

In political weight, however, Navalny in his present condition is now more valuable outside Russia than he was, or ever could have been, inside Russia when he was in full health. In the politics of next year's German election, when Chancellor Angela Merkel will not be running, the Navalny case weighs more heavily than the Litvinenko, Magnitsky, MH17, and Skripal cases all rolled into one.

In the official exchanges to date, the Russian and German governments have demanded transparency from the other. The German Chancellery declared on September 2 that the "Russian government is asked urgently to explain itself". The Russian Government had already provided, not only Navalny himself, his clothes, and his medical condition reports to the Charité Clinic in Berlin, but it had sent a formal request from the Prosecutor-General in Moscow for German reciprocity - for medical condition evidence, and such evidence as the counterpart German authorities had obtained of a criminal attack.

In response, the Germans have produced not a single medical datum, pathology, toxicology or forensic report. Not one.

Chancellor Angela Merkel, graduate of the Central Institute of Physical Chemistry in Berlin with a PhD in quantum chemistry, knows what a datum is, and what it isn't. "Spuren are not facts", an internationally known German banker with links to the chancellery observes: "For a scientist, Merkel knows what these things mean. In this case, everything she knows she has thrown away."

Eye 2

Judge Baraitser threatens to remove Assange from extradition trial, says will continue in his absence if interruptions continue

assange baraitser
© Elizabeth Cook/PAA court artist’s sketch of Julian Assange facing the district judge Vanessa Baraitser, in his October 2019 hearing at Westminster magistrates court.
After shouting "nonsense" at a lawyer representing the US government, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was ordered by a UK judge to remain silent or be removed from his own trial.

Assange is currently facing extradition to the US over accusations he conspired to hack government computers and broke an espionage law over the release of confidential cables in 2010 and 2011.

On the second day of Assange's London trial, which was already delayed from May due to the coronavirus pandemic, lawyer James Lewis, representing the US government, said at one point Assange was facing extradition and charges not over the leaking of confidential documents, but because of the publication of informants' names, which in turn allegedly put their lives at risk.

Bad Guys

Belarusian President Lukashenko says IMF offered nearly $1 billion USD bribe to impose Covid-19 lockdown

Alexander Lukashenko
© RTPresident of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko
Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko said last month via Belarusian Telegraph Agency, BelTA., that World Bank and IMF offered him a bribe of $940 million USD in the form of "Covid Relief Aid." In exchange for $940 million USD, the World Bank and IMF demanded that the President of Belarus:

- imposed "extreme lockdown on his people"
- force them to wear face masks
- impose very strict curfews
- impose a police state
- crash the economy

Star of David

Prominent Palestinian astrophysicist Imad Barghouthi sentenced to (indefinite) administrative detention by Israel

Imad Barghouthi physicist detained Israel
Dr. Imad Barghouthi, Professor of Physics at Al-Quds University, Palestine
"The repeated arrest of one of Palestine's most active and prominent scientists is a direct attack to Palestinian's rights under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights," says Chemistry Nobel Laureate George Smith. "The violation of the right to science anywhere is an attack to scientists everywhere".
Editor's Note: The following statement was issued on September 4, 2020 by Scientists for Palestine. Mondoweiss occasionally publishes press releases and statements from organizations in an effort to draw attention to overlooked issues.
On September 2nd Dr. Imad Barghouthi, Professor of Physics at Al-Quds University, Palestine, was placed under administrative detention until November 15th by an order of an Israeli military commander in the West Bank which came only hours before his scheduled release on bail.

Prof. Barghouthi was first arrested on July 16th at an Israeli check-point, then held without charges for over two weeks and then finally charged in relation to his Facebook activity. After thousands of scholars worldwide demanded Prof. Barghouthi to be freed from prison, his lawyer successfully argued for his release on bail which was granted by the judge on his case on September 2nd. Then an Israeli military order was issued in contradiction to the decision of the judge, indefinitely continuing the unlawful imprisonment of Prof. Barghouthi.

Bad Guys

China unveils global data security initiative, says some countries bullying others

Chinese State Councillor Wang Yi
Chinese State Councillor Wang Yi
China announced an initiative on Tuesday to establish global standards on data security, saying it wanted to promote multilateralism in the area at a time when "individual countries" were "bullying" others and "hunting" companies.

The announcement, by State Councillor Wang Yi, comes a month after the United States said it was purging "untrusted" Chinese apps under a program dubbed "Clean Network".

China's initiative calls for technology firms to prevent the creation of so-called backdoors in their products and services that could allow data to be obtained illegally, as well as for participants to respect the sovereignty, jurisdiction and data management rights of other countries.

It also calls for participants to not engage in large-scale surveillance of other countries or illegally acquire information of foreign citizens through information technology.

Comment: It's more than apparent the US has a massive global data collection network used to blackmail, intimidate, and harrass those it seeks to dominate. It's also clear at this point that it has used Big Tech to reach it's goals. Let's not pretend that China is not doing the same though, and actually wants a separation from technology and the state.


Black Cat 2

If a prime minister misleads a president, but no media is around to care, does it still matter?

fallen tree log forest logging
I had no intention of writing anything further on the Salisbury/Skripal case, unless something of real significance came up. But I just want to comment on something very briefly in connection with it, which is, I feel, very significant.

This weekend, The Telegraph ran an an article which gave details of phone calls Boris Johnson, and his predecessor, Theresa May have had with US President, Donald Trump. Of particular interest is a call that took place in March 2018, when Mrs May spoke to Mr Trump about what had happened in Salisbury. I'm quite sure The Telegraph, having failed in its basic journalistic duty to question the often farcical details of the case at the time, has no idea of the significance of what their US Editor, Ben Riley-Smith wrote, but I hope this piece might serve to enlighten them, and anyone else who still cares about that quaint old thing called truthfulness. Here's what the article said:

Comment: One might wonder what Ms. Haspel's angle was here. MI6 and the CIA are practically the same organization


Burka

'How many feet are you away?' Trump tells reporter asking muffled questions to remove mask - but the virtue signalling was strong with this one

trump mask reporter
© Fox News
President Donald Trump jabbed at Reuters reporter Jeff Mason during a Monday press conference, asking him several times to remove his mask so that he could hear him better.

Mason refused to take off the mask, instead saying that he would just try to speak loud enough for the president to understand him through the mask.

WATCH:


"Go ahead," Trump opened the press conference for questions by calling on Mason, and after listening for a few seconds, made it clear that he couldn't understand anything he was saying.

"You're going to have to take that off. Just — you can take it off, please," Trump said. "How many feet are you away?"

"I'll speak a lot louder," Mason protested, still somewhat muffled by the mask.

"Well, if you don't take it off, you are very muffled. It would be a lot easier — " Trump pushed back.

"Is that better?" Mason tried again.

"It's better, yeah," Trump said, visibly annoyed. "It's better."

Comment: As usual, the mask-wearing was all for show:

It's refreshing to see a president act like a normal human being - which is a lot, considering that president is Trump. But with each passing day the media become more odious. What is it about the profession that attracts the most spineless, juvenile and simpleminded people on the planet?


Info

Ice Age Farmer Report: Farms blamed for COVID19 - Brucellosis/False flag? - SB4453 - "Give up the farm"

false flag
Anthony Fauci has published a paper blaming farming and ranching for pandemics, jumping on the UN's Biodiversity agenda, and setting the stage for new Senate Bill 4453, "Food Supply Protection Act of 2020," which codifies the Rockefeller Foundation's takeover of food.

After a year of predictive programming about the next deadly pandemic having its genesis in poultry farms, rumors now abound about a deliberate brucellosis infection of our food supply - this could accomplish a number of objectives in the technocratic, transhumanist takeover of food. Christian explores the latest in the #FoodWars.


Sources

Control Panel

Thoughts on Covid-19: The Great Reset, by Klaus Schwab and Thierry Malleret

Covid legacy
A few weeks after the World Economic Forum launched their 'Great Reset' initiative, it was followed up with the release of a new book titled, 'Covid-19: The Great Reset', authored by the executive chairman of the WEF, Klaus Schwab, and Senior Director of the Global Risk Network at the institution, Thierry Malleret.

Having read the book I wanted to share with you some initial thoughts on the potential significance of the publication.

As touched upon in my last article, there are 5 planks to the Great Reset - economic, societal, geopolitical, environmental and technological - all of which the book covers in detail. But I want to focus largely on the conclusion, as it is here where the author's motivations and rationale for championing a Great Reset, in the wake of Covid-19, become clearer.

Schwab and Malleret characterise the future direction of the world as 'The Post Pandemic Era', a phrase that is repeated ad nauseam throughout. Rather than define it to a particular outcome, the authors opt instead to ask whether this new era will be marked by more or less cooperation between nations. Will countries turn inward resulting in the growth of nationalism and protectionism, or will they sacrifice their own interests for greater interdependence?

Eye 2

At a time of rapidly creeping authoritarianism, Assange's freedom is more crucial than ever

Australia Authoritarianism
My home state of Victoria has become the center of attention in the anti-lockdown movement for its authoritarian crackdown against not just people who are in violation of lockdown protocol, but people who merely post about staging future anti-lockdown protests on social media.

Police have been breaking into people's homes and arresting them in front of their children under charges of "incitement" for posting about anti-lockdown protests on Facebook, drawing international headlines. This is obviously a major threat to human rights that sets a dangerous precedent and will have many undesirable knock-on effects, and it should be condemned unequivocally.

"This is awful. 'Incitement' is going to be used to crack down on all sorts of protests - including on issues we agree with and think are worth protesting," explained Australian author and analyst Ketan Joshi of one such arrest. "Every time I post about this, I am stunned by the number of people who seem furiously unwilling to draw any connection between what's happening above and the history of climate and anti-racist protest in Australia."