OF THE
TIMES

"The intent is to reinforce the [Pentagon's] policies and values with respect to this sort of behavior and to have a dialogue with the men and women of the force and to get their views on what they are seeing at their level. He wants commands to take the necessary time to ... speak with troops about the scope of this problem. It's a two-way conversation."Austin spoke frankly with the acting service secretaries and uniformed service chiefs about his concerns about extremism in the military, including white supremacism, said Kirby, who attended the meeting. The new defense secretary, who is the first Black leader of the Defense Department, wants the service leaders to better grasp how pervasive the issue is within their formations and work with leaders to stamp it out, Kirby said.
"We may be witnessing the dawn of a sustained wave of violent insurgency within our own country, perpetrated by our own countrymen. And without national action, extremists who seek a social apocalypse ... are capable of producing endemic political violence of a sort not seen in this country since Reconstruction."In an interview with All Things Considered, Grenier discusses what that national action would mean.
The New York congresswoman suggested this week that the police officer who evacuated her from her office during the Jan. 6 Capitol riot actually endangered her — and maybe even sympathized with efforts to do her harm. After all, Ocasio-Cortez explained Monday during an Instagram livestream, the officer allegedly looked at her with "a tremendous amount of anger and hostility."
Ocasio-Cortez claims she heard loud bangs in her office during the riot "like someone was trying to break the door down." She claims she went to hide in the bathroom, at which point she heard someone enter her office and say, "Where is she?"
And that's the obvious problem here, that there is basically no pushback against Ocasio-Cortez from the industry that spent the past four years telling us how good it is at holding the powerful to account.
Who is the police officer in the congresswoman's story? What is his take on her version of events? Will he have a chance to defend himself? Will establishment journalists even bother to uncover his identity?
This is no small thing, accusing a member of the U.S. Capitol police of possibly conspiring with a seditious, murderous mob.
There were serious discussions and actions taken during the latter half of the Trump administration to censor the president and his minions. Newsrooms that participated in the blackout argued that it was too dangerous to allow President Donald Trump and his cohort a platform to spread lies and rumors. Ocasio-Cortez, on the other hand, faces no similar scrutiny or censorship, despite the fact that her tales likewise lack evidence. Indeed, there is eagerness among a great many reporters simply to parrot the congresswoman's remarks, without even so much as the pretense of seeking out corroborating evidence.
More than 100 Capitol Hill police officers were injured protecting members of Congress. One officer died. Two more have committed suicide.
None of Congress's 535 members were hurt during the riot.
If Ocasio-Cortez knows something about the motivations of the officer who evacuated her from her office, something beyond "he looked angry," she has a responsibility to provide the public with that information. The press should likewise do its job and actually vet her remarks for truthfulness.
Comment: The contrast of policy issues and executive action between Trump and Biden is powerfully stated by Mark Morgan. Check out both videos.