Judge Mary Geiger Lewis for the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina granted a motion for a preliminary injunction against the one-year law that had been written into the state's budget and put school districts at risk of losing funding should they require students and staff to wear masks.
The ACLU of South Carolina had filed a lawsuit against the provision on behalf of two disability advocacy organizations and a group of South Carolina parents of children with disabilities, such as asthma and autism.
The judge sided with the plaintiffs Tuesday, writing in her memorandum opinion,
"No one can reasonably argue that it is an undue burden to wear a mask to accommodate a child with disabilities."She compared the mask mandate to schools being required to add ramps:
"to accommodate those with mobility-related disabilities so they could access a free public education."
"Today, a mask mandate works as a sort of ramp to allow children with disabilities access to their schools. Thus, the same legal authority requiring schools to have ramps requires that school districts have the option to compel people to wear masks at school."
"This is not a close call. The General Assembly's COVID measures disallowing school districts from mandating masks ... discriminates against children with disabilities."
Comment: The ramp comparison is ludicrous. All students are not 'required to use it' due to a disabled student's special need.














Comment: We don't know to what god Hochul was praying, but it certainly isn't one that should be prayed to if his answers for help come in the form of experimental gene therapies with side effects that make one want the sickness more than the cure: