
The report in my opinion was a pure dud. It danced around with equivalencies — police forces were unprepared, there was a lack of coordination between agencies, the media was stocked with alarming stories that proved empty or false, Mr. Trudeau was provocative, the truckers were loud ... and on and on, it was a tango of "on the one hand, but then on the other hand."
It concluded with an almost outrageous reflection that reasonable people could come to a different conclusion than the author of the report. In other words the justice was saying, while I have determined the invocation of the gravest legislation on the Canadian statute books was "justified," others, of decent judgment and intellect, looking at the same facts, reviewing the same material, could quite reasonably conclude it wasn't.












Comment: See also: