It's yet another piece of the Great Reset agenda, specifically the war on food.
A quick course for non-Brits who don't know how our country works (and, indeed, the substantial number of Brits who have recently demonstrated they don't know how their own country works):
Since 1984 working farms have been 100% exempt from paying inheritance tax under the "agricultural property relief" (APR) system.
The justification for this was that working farms are needed to produce the food we all eat, and since British farming families are generally asset-rich but cash-poor, charging inheritance tax on farmland might negatively impact farm output.
Keir Starmer's government has just announced that, as of April 2026, they are scrapping the APR scheme.
This means anyone inheriting a working farm will now have to pay up to 20% of the value of the assets in tax, and since farmers operate on fine margins that will likely mean selling of parcels of land to raise money. Some farmers may be forced to sell all the land at once, since piece-meal buyers may be hard to find.
As you can imagine, the farmers are not happy about this. Nor is anyone who understands the potential implications.
This is being billed in the press as old-fashioned left vs right politics, the narrative is that the country needs revenue and that "greedy hoarding farmers aren't paying their fair share".
But, in my view, this is a lie.
Or at best a distortion. A noisy public debate that obfuscates the real intention of the policy.
I don't think this has anything to do with raising taxes. I think this is about the land.
They know this policy will force medium-sized family-run farms to sell - in fact, they are banking on it.
Take a look at Will Hutton's column in The Guardian...
Farmers have hoarded land for too long. Inheritance tax will bring new life to rural BritainHard to see this as anything but an admission of the real policy here.
And then we have former Blair aide John McTernan landing himself in hot water when he told an interviewer Starmer's government should "do to farmers what Thatcher did to miners", claiming "farming is an industry we can do without". Labour officials were quick to disavow the comments, but you can't help but think it was a "quiet part loud" moment.
As usual, it is the journalists and twitterati carrying the bag for tyranny, making bitter, snarky social media posts about "millionaire farmers" or rambling on about farmers deserving to lose their business because they voted for Brexit.
Yes, seriously:
Just as with Covid and "climate change", the powers-that-shouldn't-be are safely relying on the "educated middle class" to not understand anything at all about the way the world really works.
I imagine the self-labelled leftists think the sold-off farmland is going to be snatched up by the state and run for the common good or something equally delusional.
In his article, Hutton even argues this will energise "young farmers":
Young farmers, now increasingly crowded out of the market, will get a chance to buy land: there is the prospect of a levelling off, even a fall, in farm rents. New life and ideas will be brought to the rural economy as innovative, energetic farmers enter the market - and production even increases.As if the country is full of aspiring independent farmers with nothing but a hoe, a dream and a few million pounds to spend on land.
It is a fantasy.
Common sense tells you any land farmers are forced to sell will be bought up by corporate giants who can afford to pay over market price (We've seen the same thing with the housing market in the US).
Big Farmer conglomerates that want to plant green deserts of monocultures for making vegan protein alternatives because meat and dairy are bad for the environment. And that's very much the best-case scenario. At least that's still food production, of a sort.
Alternatively, it will be bought up by energy suppliers who then lease the land at extortionate rates back to local councils to build solar panels and/or wind turbines that don't work in the name of saving the planet.
Or maybe it will be bought by "climate-friendly" NGOs or billionaire philanthropists who accept massive "grants" from the government to "conserve the environment" by just letting prime farmland lie fallow.
We know all this happens, they've been doing it for years.
The British government started paying "lump sums to farmers who wanted to leave the industry" in 2022.
Farmers were served "compulsory purchase orders" to make space to build high-speed rail links.
The "Environmental Land Management" scheme pays farmers to "rewild" fields.
Farmland is being flooded to create salt marshes, earmarked for cultivated forests and solar panels in the name of combatting (entirely imaginary) climate change.
This isn't just a British issue. It is a global one.
In 2023 the EU "reformed" its Common Agricultural Policy to award subsidies based on sustainability rather than productivity, at the same time they are securing trade deals with South America to import food rather than grow their own (French farmers are protesting this). Denmark is going "rewild" 15% of its farmable land to "lower fertiliser usage". Like the UK, the US has both federal and state programs that pay farmers not to farm.
It goes on and on. It's a simple system:
- Make small or medium-sized farms financially non-viable
- Force families to sell their land.
- Have Mega-Corps buy it up
Once that goal is achieved they take the narrative anywhere they want it to go. They can engineer food shortages and price increases, then they can say those shortages show "how badly we need food reform" and start instituting climate-friendly rationing and meat bans and forcing people to eat bugs and lab-grown goo.
They've got the land, they've got the food, so they can say - and do - whatever they want.
All the while food prices will go up, family farms and organic products will begin to disappear, and idiotic self-styled "communists" on Twitter will smile smugly and think they won one for the little guy.
The farmers are planning a large protest for November 19th. I would urge anybody who requires food to live give them some moral support.
Their rallying cry is "No Farmers, No Food!". Unfortunately for them, that is very much the point.
Reader Comments
I've fought for years in both politics and law to try to turn things around, it was a useless plan. You cannot negotiate with a dishonest man. The old saying, "If a man will lie to you once, he'll lie to you twice." is absolutely TRUE.
If a liar is killed, he will never lie again. - It works.
Trust fund babies receive money from Trust, they don't necessarily control the Trust.
.
what remains of them .
.
[Link]
[Link]
.
1. "Corporations" - 18%
2. "Aristocrats" - 30%
3. "Tycoons" - 18%
~
I rounded down to 65% - but odds are it is higher than that - and that is PLUM wrong.
I didn't even waste my time adding up some of the other numbers - these lands have been STOLEN.
You know it - so do I.
~
I mean consider this -
Individual Homeowners - a mere 5%.
That is WRONG. It ought not be as such.
.
[Link]
.
So maybe these "Enclosure Acts" ought be repealed or rescinded or perhaps the commoners can collectively choose non-compliance and kick the ones wasting property out of the community....I mean there is precedent for that in "common law" going back even longer.
Cause to whom does the land belong if not the commoners grown up and lived there for many generations?
Ken
So first this started up in England industrially, then it moved to the northeast of the usa - then it went south - it was seeking cheaper labor I reckon.....and then it went to the far east and to mejico and to a lesser extent south america - but I ask this question in all humility - shouldn't we all be able to make gloves and jackets and pants and blouses locally? I think so - I mean really - the textile mills shutdown during my career - I could list them out for you - I went to a textile facility in Wagram, NC where they made enough towels to supply half of America (literally - the place was built in the 1960's - concrete floors and the "latest" industrial machinery - twas "state of the art at the time") - I went to a place they made sheets - both printed and dyed - in the Clemson, SC area - both facilities were part of the Griffin - (WestPoint Stevens) - and now they are gone - just gone completely - the jobs, the products, all the benefit of those facilities are gone - and for what - cheap labor.....what "killed" WestPoint Stevens was "stupid owners" who got over their heads in debt no doubt....tis a shame all around - but cheap labor ain't all it is cracked up to be - nor our "cheap goods" from overseas - lots of waste there - no doubt in that - lots of energy wasted needlessly in shipping costs.
~
That is "wrong-way" thinking - these industries of this nature making goods we all know how to make - they ought just be local - that makes a shit-load more sense - and tis applicable to more industries besides just textiles - and these globalist have lost not only the "narrative" - but they have lost the spirit of what it means to love your homeland - and that is plum WRONG - tis time for remedy in that regard - time for some local production to get going again - and then use the tools of the trade - make it locally - and then that is like "banking on the future" of a better community for all of us - everywhere.
That ain't "pie in the sky" - but rather it is time to tell these fucking elitist - time to back off and remember where you were born - if you can't do that - and you continue to cause harm - then time for you to get some justice cause some peasants are humble - but we ain't fucking cattle and you push too far - expect pushback - and I sense it already - it is coming.....
Better ideas beckon.
Ken
[Link]
[Link]
~
WestPoint Stevens, Burlington Industries, Milliken (they are still around to a degree), American & Efird (they still got a place going local - it uses a thermal oxidizer) - sons of bitches - many, many more - I've been to many textile facilities. Oh Lord, I remember one place in Elkin, NC - a place I drive by often nowadays - that place was such a travesty of poor management - they were hanging on by a thread and mostly gone when the sought my assistance with environmental compliance - it was seriously super sad walking around that place mostly empty and a shell of itself.
Hells-bells - my getaway place was started by "Colonel" Fries - came out of Winston Salem to get some free hydroelectric energy when the local landowner offered the place up - state of the art facility built in 1902 till it finally was shutdown due to "cotton dust" regs too expensive to comply with is the story they tell - but odds are it was the "globalist" thinking shut that place down - and like so many other places in the southeast - folks lost their livelihood - and town became depressed.
Tis the ignominy of globalist ideology totally proven wrong - and tis time for better ideas - time to bring some business back home is what I think. It it takes "tariffs" to do this - then so be it - better to be locally self-sufficient - don't you think. I do.
Screw the high-dollar billionaires seeking more wealth upon the backs of commoners all over the god-damn planet with their ambitions of total control over the peasants whom they consider cattle and fodder - fuck them. Let them get called out for all the harm they have caused over my whole lifetime - a lifetime of being lied to by the gubment and a bunch of fucking so-called elitist who are anything but - better ideas beckon - they will be left behind - dust from the 20th century ideas they espouse proven wrong.
That's what I think and how you like them apples?
~
Lastly - let me share this with you directly.
[Link] - she has my support.
.
~
So - the couple made the mistake of asking me to lay the laminate down the hallway - and I'm sorry - that is not easy to make cuts proper - I didn't have the best tools and after awhile the lady of the house started getting seriously irritated with me.....but the fella there - he was just happy to have somebody else there to "shoot the shit" with.......I finally finished that effing job - but damn - I didn't do as good of work as I know how to do now.
~
Lesson learned all-around I reckon.....
~
I truly desire local small-scale enterprises to start "forming up" - and I know there is the technology nowadays to do this for so many products - and I think that is the "wave of the future" - I sure hope so....
~
Regards,
BK
I think she is a fine women - and so far - seems totally genuine to me - and being much of what she expresses is consistent with my own views - then I'd be a fool not to support her - so I do!
Ken
The context is the "great reset". Following the plandemic genocide of the population, the remainder are herded into the smart city prisons where they will be fed on "soylent" green...
around here, various people make deals with their government, and are thus able to 'purchase' the few available scraps of land for three reasons:
1) to build a big fucking house, the biggest possible.
2) to create and mow a big fucking lawn, with their fucking lawn mower, the biggest possible.
3) to shoot a big fucking 12 pt. buck, with their fucking rifles, the biggest ones possible, out back in the 'wild' woods.
they paid for it and they 'own' it.
these are very pleasant people, once you get to know them.
fuck you.
ned,
out
(128 million population, England - 68 million population)
[Link]
STARTING WORLD WAR THREE
EVERY WEB CAMERA IN LONDON IS SWITCHED OFF IN LONDON, JUST AS THEY DID PRIOR TO PRINCESS DIANNAS MURDER ON HER LAST JOURNEY.
[Link]
Another topic on the Nature if the Feminine ๐ตโโ๏ธ Motorcycle Mary
[Link]