OF THE
TIMES
Powell shot back at Carlson during a Friday interview with Fox Business anchor Maria Bartiromo.Is it really more about Carlson's possibly bruised ego about Powell not making a personal appearance? She did offer documentation and an expert. Why wasn't he happy with that?
Carlson claimed on Thursday evening that Powell "got angry" with her and repeatedly refused to appear on his program to lay out evidence of voter fraud, including accusations voting machines and software were manipulated to change votes from Trump to Joe Biden.
"No, I didn't get angry with the request to provide evidence," Powell said, going on to claim that she had offered the evidence Carlson was requesting.
"In fact, I sent an affidavit to Tucker that I had not even attached to a pleading yet to help him understand the situation, and I offered him another witness who could explain the mathematics and the statistical evidence far better than I can. I'm not really a numbers person," she said.
Powell accused Carlson of being "insulting, demanding, and rude" and she asked that he not contact her again "in those terms."
Carlson claimed his show had also contacted "people in positions of authority in the Trump campaign" who claimed Powell had not provided them with evidence either.
The Fox News host's criticism of Powell followed a Thursday press conference that included members of the president's legal team, including Powell and Rudy Giuliani. The lawyers claimed numerous witness statements provided evidence of voter fraud, including thousands of fraudulent ballots being counted in favor of Biden.
One of the more explosive claims is that voting software, primarily Dominion Voting Systems, could have been used to actually change votes. Powell cited "spikes" in the vote count following election night that suggested outside interference. Dominion has denied these allegations.
"In terms of the level of corruption we are looking at here, we have no idea how many Republican or Democratic candidates ... paid to have the system rigged to work for them," she said.
Powell encouraged media figures like Carlson "to review all the materials we have provided so far and conduct their own investigations."
Carlson's segment earned him plenty of pushback from the president's more loyal supporters, who have insisted his claims of winning the election in a landslide are true.
And with Larry O'Connor, of the Washington Examiner's Examining Politics,(audio only):
- There are many smoking guns and we are going to need federal protection for many people
- 3 million dead people voted
- A lot of the evidence of fraud is coming out next week. We have more evidence coming in every day. It only gets worse and worse.
- The fraud was very widespread, very deliberate and very well funded.
- I think the fraud went much further than just President Trump. I think they did it to John James and others.
- We have data out of California in 2016 that Hillary Clinton did it to Bernie Sanders there.
- We have a number of smoking guns and we may have to get witness protection for them.
- We have a lot of evidence, it's beyond impressive and absolutely terrifying.
- Eric Coomer, Dominion VP was caught on Zoom call assuring Antifa that Trump would lose. We have an affidavit and a copy of the call.
- These are federal court lawsuits. They're paramount to any future life of our republic.
- We've got evidence of people being paid. We got check stubs from people being paid.
Tucker is still sore:
Larry O'Connor, host of the Washington Examiner's Examining Politics, referenced articles from the New York Times and HuffPost that alleged a backdoor in Dominion Voting Systems used in several key battleground states that could have been exploited to create vote tallies "that did not exist."
Sidney said there were "multiple people" who actually saw the fraud take place in real-time."Their system even admits, their own training manual admits that people can go in and do that. That people can go in and put all kinds of votes in a "trash" folder and then 'trash' them," Powell said.
"There are devices on the internet that can be used to see it and we have multiple people who actually saw it as it was happening. We essentially have some pictures of it and it is terrifying and it is a huge national security issue. Why the Department of Justice and the FBI have not done something on this immediately."...
I am staking my personal and professional reputation on this."
A day after Carlson sparked a ruckus on social media for taking a dig at Powell for not sharing the evidence of alleged voting fraud with his program, the Fox News star claimed "over the last 24 hours" he's "heard from a lot of people, including from people in the White House and people close to the President" about his segment, and that none of them appears to have seen the evidence firsthand.General Michael Flynn weighs in:Like us, they concluded this election was not fair. Like us they are willing to believe any explanation for what happened. Like us they have not seen a single piece of evidence showing that the software changed votes.Carlson noted that among the president's associates his show reached out to were other members of Trump's legal team, who also were apparently unaware of the evidence.
"And by 'they' we're including other members of Donald Trump's own legal team - they haven't seen Powell's evidence either. Nor testimony from employees inside the software companies, nor damning internal documents, nor copies of the software itself," Carlson said in an "update" on his beef with Powell.
The host didn't disclose exactly who he had spoken to about the allegations, noting, however, that if Powell indeed proves them all in a court of law within the next few weeks, as she has promised, "no one would be more grateful" than himself.
The thinly-veiled swipe at Powell comes after she fired back at the hugely popular conservative stalwart for seemingly doubting that she was in possession of said evidence during his show on Thursday.
On and bloody on. I think, although I don't know , that one doesn't go flashing one's evidentiary material hither and yon prior to making one's intended filings.Yes, I found a comment (I think from a lawyer) on twitter, saying that judges to no take kindly to attorneys presenting cases in public prior to court case as a way to drum up public pressure.
Tucker the fucker bailed on us at this hour?I guess that's what MSM were saving him for. They knew this hour would come.
"We would've given her the whole hour" ... and then Faux and all the others would spend 24/7 trying to undermine the evidence before the court hearingExactly!!
In Sept, Tucker had Dr. Darren Beattie on as a quick guest and Beattie warned that the cast of characters who do color revolutions overseas were getting ready to do one here and oust Trump in the election (https://twitter.com/DarrenJBeattie/status/1324010150571757568).
The day after the election, did Tucker say "gee is this what Darren Beattie was warning about when he said they were getting ready to do a color revolution and oust Trump?" NO, HE SAID NOTHING!!! WHEN HE KNEW DAMN WELL IT WAS A COUP!!
Tucker is a FRAUD with NO integrity--he's there for the $$$$ just like the rest of him.
Tucker and others on FOX occasionally say some truth to lure you back in, but they are all fake media. They lie about foreign policy, big-pharma, vaccines, GMOs, Covid. How come citizens can figure out the truth about the Covid HOAX, but these FOX/Faux news hosts can't figure it out when they get million dollar salaries????
100% BOYCOTT FOX!!!