Today, Moderna announced that its vaccine candidate, named mRNA-1273, "appeared to produce an immune response in eight people who received it." Moderna's response is odd given that the "study" in question is focused on safety and "is actually not designed to measure effectiveness of the vaccine," according to a report in TIME. Notably, none of the study's findings on vaccine safety were reported aside from claims it was "generally safe." It is also worth noting that this "safety-focused" study only began in March and thus, to date, represents only an examination of the vaccine's effects in the very short term.
Major media outlets in multiple countries ran with the headlines trumpeting that Moderna's Covid-19 vaccine "shows promising early results" and has presented "encouraging early signs" because of its purported ability to produce Covid-19 antibodies in humans. In addition, these media reports failed to raise other simple yet necessary questions such as how a sample size of only eight people can translate into scientific findings of any real significance without further testing involving larger sample sizes. They also failed to note that the study in question is not even finished as a U.S. government press release noted that the findings in question are merely "interim results." In addition, the study is being led by the U.S.' National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), itself headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, who is a key figure in the U.S. government's coronavirus response.
Though it is unclear if these "encouraging early signs" will be replicated in future tests of larger samples that are actually designed to test the vaccine's effectiveness, the news is surely welcome to Moderna, given that their past mRNA vaccines failed to produce hardly any immune response at all, explaining why the company has never brought an mRNA vaccine to market in its entire history as a company.
However, since at least last fall, Moderna has sought to resolve this issue by adding "nanoparticles" to its mRNA vaccine, a modification financed by the Pentagon's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Moderna is a "strategic ally" of DARPA and has received millions from DARPA and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation several years prior to the current coronavirus crisis. DARPA's plans for nanoparticles and nanotechnology and their potentially Orwellian applications were the subject of a recent The Last American Vagabond report.
Thanks to the "interim results" of this new study, Moderna is set to take the lead in the race to gain government approval for a Covid-19 vaccine. Moderna had already pulled ahead of other Covid-19 vaccine candidates in recent weeks, being the first vaccine in the U.S. to go the human trials (after it was allowed to skip animal trials) and also enjoying strong support from the U.S. government. For instance, Moderna's Covid-19 vaccine recently received fast-track approval from the Food and Drug administration (FDA) after receiving the "green light" to proceed to Phase 2 testing prior to the results of Phase 1 being published. Moderna's president, Dr. Stephen Hoge, recently said the company now expects to begin the final third phase of testing sometime this summer.
In addition to support from the FDA, Moderna has also received considerable U.S. government funding ($438 million) from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), a division of HHS overseen by HHS' Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) Robert Kadlec. Moderna has also stated that it is directly collaborating with the U.S. government to bring its vaccine candidate to market.
Moderna's considerable lead has also been the result of backing that it received in January from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), which was founded in 2017 by the governments of Norway and India along with the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Moderna's Covid-19 vaccine has also received additional millions from long-time Moderna backer Bill Gates. Gates recently authored an article where he described Moderna's mRNA vaccine for Covid-19 as the "most exciting" and discussed it at length.
Gates' affinity for Moderna may owe to the fact that Moderna's co-founder, MIT's Robert Langer, is a Gates associate whose lab developed the Gates-funded "quantum dot 'tattoo'" vaccine identification marker that is "visible using a special smartphone camera app and filter" and was described by Science Alert as "a low-risk tracking system." Another Langer-Gates partnership is a "birth control microchip" inserted to the body that releases contraceptives and can be turned on and off wirelessly.
MEET DR. ZAKS
With Moderna taking a firm lead relative to the other Covid-19 vaccine hopefuls, it is worth taking a closer look at the man who has overseen its development, Moderna's current Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Tal Zaks. Zaks, an Israeli citizen who began his career at GlaxoSmithKline, oversees "preclinical development, clinical development and regulatory affairs" for Moderna and all of its subsidiaries.
In a 2017 TED Talk, two years after joining Moderna, Zaks spoke at length about how he views mRNA vaccines and their modality, including those he produces at Moderna. In a speech entitled "The disease-eradicating potential of gene editing," Zaks' description of Moderna's mRNA products as, making permanent edits to human genes, clashes with often touted claims that the genetic material in mRNA vaccines "degrade" over time and do not permanently alter human genetics like DNA vaccines.
Beginning his talk, Zaks states that Moderna and similar companies "are actually hacking the software of life and that it's changing the way we think of and treat disease." He describes mRNA as "critical information that determines what a cell will actually do" and then states that, if one could "introduce a line of code or change a line of code" in a person's genome, that has "profound implications for everything." He then falsely claims that Moderna's products at the time were proven to "work in people" as the company, prior to Covid-19, was never able to convince the federal government to license its mRNA vaccines for human use due to their lack of effectiveness.
Zaks further described his view of well-known diseases like cancer as being caused by "screwed-up DNA" that can be "fixed" with Moderna mRNA vaccines, which he also refers to in the talk as "information therapy" given that he says Moderna's vaccines work by altering the "operating systems" of human cells, i.e. their genetic code.
The summary of Zaks' talk encapsulates his view as the following simple question: "If our cells are the hardware and our genetic material the operating system, what if we could change a few lines of code?" — seemingly suggesting that the permanent introduction of changes into the human genome is as simple as troubleshooting or programming a computer or phone application. It also says that Zaks considers the future of "personalized medicine" to be "gene-editing vaccines tailored to each patient's immune system." The Ted Talk recommended after viewing Zaks' speech on the Ted Talk website notably broaches a key point that Zaks overlooks, namely that gene-editing can "change an entire species - forever."
Zaks' statements are noteworthy and concerning for several reasons, including the fact that DARPA — Moderna's "strategic ally" — is also openly funding research aimed at "reprogramming genes" and "manipulat[ing] genes or control[ling] gene expression to combat viruses and help human bodies withstand infection" caused by Covid-19. The DARPA-backed project would use a method that is known to cause severe genetic damage that has actually been shown to aggravate the conditions it was meant to cure.
With such permanent gene-altering technology on the fast-track to become the first Covid-19 vaccine widely available for use, it is deeply concerning that this experimental vaccine with potentially far-reaching consequences is being rammed through thanks to fervent support from both the U.S. government and controversial philanthropists that apparently have little interest in studies examining the mRNA vaccine's long-term effects. Given that the stage has already been set for mandatory vaccinations that will be "distributed" throughout the U.S. by the military, now is the time to vigorously raise awareness about the Moderna vaccine's gravely under-reported ability to "hack the software of life" in ways that could harm public health.
Reader Comments
"Moderna conducted unsuccessful trials in the traditional higher-margin chronic therapeutic areas such as cardiovascular disease with AstraZeneca. In 2014, the company moved to focus on the lower-margin vaccine sector, given that an mRNA vaccine, safety issues aside, will always stimulate a level of antibody development in subjects.[5][8] The strategic change led industry experts, and Moderna employees, to question the long-term financial viability of the company.[5][8]"
"In December 2018, Moderna became the largest biotech initial public offering (IPO) in history, raising $600 million for 8% of its shares, implying an overall valuation of $7.5 billion, and with cumulative losses of $1.5 billion and equity raised of $3.2 billion, since inception.[5][11] The company has a reputation for secrecy and little of its work has ever been published, and none peer-reviewed or scientifically validated,[6][7] an approach that was compared to Theranos by Nature.[12][5] In May 2020, Moderna was valued at $30 billion but none of its mRNA molecules had reached large clinical trials, and several had failed due to side-effects.[5]"
Flaggship Pioneering Who are they?
Better yet-who do they play with?
BECause the name usually gives you some breadcrumbs.
Here's who they are elbow to elbow to at the table.( well at least behind closed doors.)
Remember AstraZENECA from the article above...yep.
& then there's some other players.
BAYER CropScience (?)
& then the company that used to make chocolate bars, & oh how I used to love those bars.
Until I found out.........ah well.
NESTLE Health Science,
Now what would a chocolate bar maker, & a Bayer Aspirin maker want to do with
vaccines? Hm.
WOW, look at all the companies they work with!
[Link]
Do you see any that look familiar?
One of them have possible ties to this : [Link]
You see,
Flaggship Pioneering is the
UMBRELLA
In which these companies live. They are pretty much hidden from view.
But they operate under the "sustainable" innovation.
Do you see it? What? DO YOU SEE IT? There's a race going on RIGHT NOW.
AND there's TRILLIONS, Maybe GADZILLIONS of Dollars at stake.
The race isn't for Oil, or for arms, or for gold, or to go to the moon this time.
No.
The race is to be the first to come up with the shot. the vax. Who will it be?
Will it be Moderna? Follow the money....................................
They had no success in mRna and yet they suddenly are worth $30 BILLION acorns. (?)
Who do you think you mind find endorsing, and funding Moderna?
Yep..
...
"Moderna is creating potential mRNA medicines for a wide range of diseases and conditions which currently include infectious diseases, oncology, rare genetic diseases, and cardiovascular diseases. Moderna is developing these potential medicines independently and through strategic alliances with collaborators, including AstraZeneca, Merck, (remember Merck from the MMR Virologists lawsuit?) and Vertex Pharmaceuticals, as well as the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) , the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) , and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation ."
And what about Vertex? well, if you follow the breadcrumbs they lead to
CRISPR. & who are they you might ask? Well my dear friends.
They EDIT GENES
Now why would we need a 'gene editor" working with a company that creates "vaxxines"?
Have you heard of GMO's?
well, here's something for you to watch. [Link] I highly suggest you watch it! 'This is not a rabbit hole, this a black hole!
Who knows what? Ask yourself why our President endorse this?
( * some of the information I've posted is cross-linking with information in the authors article)
Anthony Patch
"DNA Modification And In Silico DNA" (135 mins) [Link]
In silico DNA = synthetic, artificially created DNA that they want in all of our bodies and the CV-19 'vaccine' is how they're planning to put it into us.
If you want a follow up, I also recommend Patch on "The Space Cloud" (157 mins - skip the first 40 min, its all ambient music) [Link]
5G will awaken the nanotech DNA they had inserted into our bodies previously and from there it's game over.
IDK but would love others' thoughts on this.How much of our DNA can be altered before we're no longer human?
I'm of the opinion its because the Saviour was 100% biologically human. Jesus is the new representative head of humanity, replacing Adam (Romans 5). Because he associates the Godhead to us in his 100% human body, we, 100% humans, can associate with the Godhead through him.
If you're no longer 100% biologically human, can you still do that?
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
Surely some revelation is at hand;
Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
Troubles my sight: somewhere in the sands of the desert
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.
The darkness drops again; but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?
1920
[Link] to great analysis of Yeats' poem. Emphasis in bold mine, as they pertain to earlier question.
...Moderna has sought to resolve this issue by adding "nanoparticles" to its mRNA vaccine, a modification financed by the Pentagon's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Moderna is a "strategic ally" of DARPA and has received millions from DARPA and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation...No, they wouldn't want to gnetically modify us to be better and more obedient slaves, would they ?
Beginning his talk, Zaks states that Moderna and similar companies "are actually hacking the software of life and that it's changing the way we think of ...
The Ted Talk recommended after viewing Zaks' speech on the Ted Talk website notably broaches a key point that Zaks overlooks, namely that gene-editing can "change an entire species - forever."
Why, just look at the number of commenters who sound like lunatics!
The result is that the folks who most need to read this and similar articles will be turned off by the same auto-reaction which causes healthy people to feel revulsion when faced with a sufferer of severe skin issues or mangled limbs, etc.
Nobody wants to catch mind cancer. It's a well-worn disinfo tactic to wake up the crazy when these kinds of stories pop up. You don't have to be on some black hat payroll, you just have to be vulnerable and exploitable.
Please, ladies and gentlemen of the comment section, in general I find it useful to make an effort to examine where my impulses are originating from; hit pause before posting and really think about how a message might be perceived by the general public.
Remember: Sanity sells.
If the 'layman', is reading the comments to understand IF the story is important and filled with "hard truths", then the layperson just may not be THINKING.
When a commentator, such as yourself feels the need to take a P__ on everyone's rights; said commentator would be advised that this is a Free and Open forum, where people are allowed to comment on the articles. Just as you have the right to express your distaste in
"the Lunatics". And your fear of "Mind Cancer"? Do you mean the type of 'mind cancer', that allows for FREE THINKING?
Your comments sounds a bit like someone suffering from Caesar Complex.
One final point to make Woodsman. Sanity sells? Is that so? Or do you mean propaganda sells?
Step right up
SPIN the
Wheel of
the Unknown!
What are you willing to do to yourself? What are you willing to let them do to you?
COVID MOTIVE . Just remember that phrase.
The only thing good for synthetics are: rugs, barbie dolls, sweaters, egg beaters.....
SYNTHETIC a(1): of, relating to, or produced by chemical or biochemical synthesisespecially : produced artificiallysynthetic drugssynthetic silk(2): of or relating to a synfuelb: devised, arranged, or fabricated for special situations to imitate or replace usual realitiesc: FACTITIOUS, BOGUS
~ *Merriams
" Moderna is an American biotech company focused on drug discovery and drug development based exclusively on messenger RNA (mRNA).[4][5] Moderna is attempting to insert synthetic mRNA into the living cells of patients that would reprogram their cells to create their own therapies and vaccines, rather than being created externally and injected as with conventional medicines. It is a novel technique that was abandoned by large pharmaceutical and biotech companies which were unable to overcome the dangerous side-effects of getting RNA into cells.[6][7][8] As of May 2020, no mRNA drug has been approved for human use.[9][10]"
Happy vaxxing.