© Reuters / RT
"If you talk about Russia, meddling, interference - that takes the PDB off the rails," one former senior U.S. intelligence official said, using an acronym for the president's daily briefing.
Some US officials did not confirm to The Post whether Trump was receiving the latest intelligence on Russia, but several current and former members of the administration's staff said Trump's briefing sometimes buries the information about Russian meddling to make it easier for the president to handle, but at times is not even presented to him verbally.
Although a spokesman for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Brian Hale, told The Post that the briefing is "written by senior-level, career intelligence officers," and that it "always provides objective intelligence - including on Russia - to the president and his staff," officials said that this intelligence is sometimes only included in the written briefing and is not communicated to the president orally.
Trump's strong feelings about the election meddling issue have led to inconsistencies within intelligence agencies themselves. Mike Pompeo, the director of the CIA, has at times diminished the importance of his own agency's findings on the matter, even though the CIA unequivocally stands by their reports.
While intelligence officials and agencies intentionally avoided addressing whether Russian interference affected the outcome of the 2016 election, Pompeo has stated that it did not.
Source: Business Insider
Comment: The main force of the article is that briefers deliberately don't tell Trump about the intel community's "Russian interference" intelligence. But according to the same article, all that information is included in the briefing. Sometimes it's stated orally, sometimes just in writing. And if what these "insiders" say is true, this is what it basically amounts to: Trump gets mad when intel community tries to BS him. Of course the IC will stand by whatever is in their reports - they have to, and their credibility is on the line. But that does not in any way imply that the intel in their briefings is actually true. It doesn't even imply that they believe it. WMDs in Iraq, anyone? Gaddafi is killing his own people?