OF THE
TIMES
One could say that the demolition experts used were too professional as they could just as well have made the buildings collaps to one side. Especially since loss of life and damage of property was of no concern.I have often wondered if it would be possible to install the demolition charges during initial construction and play the long-game. It might even make financial sense to do so for a typical developer, not even the conspiracy-minded. All buildings have a useful life, and then they must come down, and it''s also much easier and less costly to build things in rather than retrofit them later (anyone who has done a home remodeling project knows that you never know what you will find when you open up the walls). If that is the case, one would put the charges in with the intent of making the building fall into it's own footprint. If it were done, say, in a haste in 2000-2001 leading up to 9/11, it would seem a better plan to avoid talk of "controlled demolition" and make the building fall over into the street.
"STAR WARS in Iraq" movie by Maurizio Torrealta and Sigfrido Ranucci collaboration Giuseppe Mealli images research Giuseppe Soinella with the collaboration of Alessandro Rampiella For a forensic study of what happened to seven World Trade Center buildings on September 11, 2001, read the book "Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11" by Dr. Judy Wood, a structural engineer with a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science and expertise in experimental stress analysis, engineering mechanics and strength of materials testing.
Remembering the MSM actual news clip which showed molten steel pouring out one of the WTC towers, leads me to believe that only thermal explosives or a laser could melt steel like that. Aircraft fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel....,
.... and the so-called aircraft hitting the WTC is a whole other issue.