Society's Child
The mayor of Poway, a city in San Diego County, defended the decision to dump 550,000 gallons of drinking water into a nearby canyon, according to ABC affiliate KGTV.
"It was a perfect storm of conservation and heat," Poway Mayor Steve Vaus told KGTV.
In an ironic twist, the reason so much water was lost was because of conservation efforts. The water sat in the Blue Crystal Reservoir for too long, according to KGTV. Heat created a chemical imbalance of chloramine, a combination of chlorine and ammonia used to disinfect drinking water, making the water, according to state regulations, unsafe to drink.
"I think it's a shame, the city should have prepared better for it," said resident Helen Shelden.
More than 500,000 gallons of water can reportedly supply four households for a year.
Vaus said the water was dumped rather than being put back in the lake where it came from, because it would be too expensive.
"This was just an unfortunate consequence that pains us, but we want to keep our people healthy," Vaus said.
The mayor said the water wasted is a small amount compared to what residents use annually, according to KGTV.
The City of Poway did not immediately respond to ABC News' request for comment.
Comment: There are so many other uses for the water that was dumped besides drinking water! What a waste of precious water. The city needs to be held accountable.
Reader Comments
For example, when banks, as entities, are being held responsible for fraud that is actually the theft of billion/trillions, or money laundering drug cartel money, or collusion to fix rates, etc, etc., etc., the senior executives (i.e., the CEO, high-ranking officers, directors) who actually directed or did these things almost always get a free pass while the shareholders (and occasionally the bondholders) collectively pay the amount of the fines for the "company's) transgressions. Consider how many bank executives are in jail or in the poorhouse due to their frauds over the past decade.
The exact same thing occurs with any gov't entity. When police misbehavior results in large fines, the taxpayers pay the fine, while the actual miscreant police officers, the chief of police, and the mayor rarely experience any adverse consequences. Again, consider how many cops, police chiefs, or mayors are in jail or in the poorhouse for horrible police behavior while taxpayers are on the hook for paying the large settlements. Similarly, when a city violates contract law, or fair employment practices, etc., etc., it is the taxpayers who end up paying, not the gov't employees who actually perform the law violations.
A gov't entity, just like a corporation, is an entity which is totally incapable of performing any action, good or bad, on its own: all actions thereof are conceived of, directed, and performed by individual employees of the entity. The individuals who actually direct/perform these actions should be answerable for their individual actions, NOT the taxpayers.






SOTT comments: "The city needs to be held accountable." This attitude exemplifies one of the major problems we have in the US today.
"The city needs to be held accountable." quite simply means that the taxpayers/residents will get hosed. It is not the CITY that needs to be held accountable, rather, it is the moronic and/or incompetent GOV'T EMPLOYEES (from the mayor on down).
For far too long, public employees at all levels have been essentially immunized from their incompetence and/or lackadaisical/slipshod job performance because their organizations, and not they as individuals, are assigned "responsibility". It is ordinary citizens/taxpayers that end up paying for the mal-. mis-, or nonfeasance of these public employees while they suffer no adverse consequences and continue to suck up great salaries, perks, and retirement bennies no matter how abysmally they perform their jobs.
SOTT should NOT be advocating continuation of this type of outrage that is constantly being perpetrated on regular citizens/taxpayers.