In a study published Tuesday in the journal PLOS Biology, scientists from the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) claim the industry manipulated science, influenced regulations and even shut down its own research when it indicated a link between sugar and heart disease almost 50 years ago.
"The Sugar Association proved to itself that calories from sugar had different metabolic effects than calories from starch," lead author Cristin E. Kearns, who discovered the industry documents, told UCSF. "This is in stark contrast to its public position, then and now, that all calories are created equal."
The study claims that a Sugar Research Foundation (SRF) scheme, entitled Project 259, which had been set up to investigate the effects of sugar in animals in 1969, deliberately withheld evidence that sugar consumption creates high levels of triglyceride, a type of fat that travels through the blood - an issue that can lead to poor bladder and cardiovascular health.
Stanton Glantz, a Professor at the UCSF School of Medicine said the study was stopped in 1972 despite scientists asking for time to collect more data. "This case is one more illustration that, like the tobacco industry, the sugar industry has a long history of suppressing scientific results that do not support its economic interests," said Glantz, a senior author on the project.
Comment: Stanton Glantz is the high priest of the anti-smoking movement. He is famous for advocating that anti-smoking data be made up until science has "the opportunity to catch up", and then regularly practising that technique. Unfortunately the man is not credible.
Here is an example of Glantz in action:
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(16)30024-8/fulltext













Comment: More on the deleterious effects of sugar: