
© Bart Maat / AFP
Witnesses giving public testimony about the alleged chemical attack in Douma - what can be uncomfortable about that? A lot, according to one journalist, as the event was organized by Russia. Readers were not convinced.
The Intercept's Robert Mackey
took issue with Russia's decision to allow an 11-year-old "victim" of the alleged attack to speak at The Hague about his experience, claiming that the boy's testimony was an affront to the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons' (OPCW) ongoing investigation and included nothing to support the theory that the gas attack was staged.
"Rather than wait for @OPCW to verify its claim that there was no chemical attack in Syria, Russia staged its own event at OPCW headquarters in The Hague and flew in an 11-year-old witness who said nothing to support the theory that he acted in a hoax video,"Mackey
wrote on Twitter, linking to his Intercept piece.
In his article, Mackey cites an OPCW statement which recommended that the boy, Hassan Diab, and sixteen other witnesses be interviewed by the fact-finding mission, and that the briefing should be postponed until after the investigation is completed.
Comment: See:
- Joe Quinn on PressTV: 'Macron in Washington to Convince Trump Not to Break Iran Deal'
- Merkel should snub Macron's pandering to Trump's war drive
- Sanctions backfire: Russia and Iran sign $2.5B deal, as U.S. legislates itself out of a lucrative market
- Europe ready to defy US economic sanctions on Iran
Also check out SOTT radio's: Behind the Headlines: Trump Wags the Iran Riot Dog, Kim Talks Korean Peace